Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T11CM00617
Parcel: 116206350

Address:
125 S LINDA AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T11CM00617
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/28/2011 ERIC NEWCOMB ADA REVIEW Passed
03/01/2011 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Denied Fire Comments for T11CM00617

Sheet A0.2
1. The 2 hour exterior wall in detail 4 needs to bear on 2 hour supports. It may be possible to reduce the rating due to distance of the top floor wall to the property line.
2. Where is the keynote legend for this sheet?

Sheet A2.1

1. The fire pump needs to be in a separate room of its own.

Sheet A8.2
1. Tucson does not issue elevator permits. It is the State of Arizona Industrial Commission.

Sheet FP 1
1. The FDC needs to be relocated out from behind the parking row.
2. The fire pump must be in its own room. See NFPA 20.
3. The pump must have ten pipe diameters from the turn in the intake side. See NFPA 20.
4. Separate permits and submittals are required for the alarms and automatic fire sprinkler systems.
5. The calculations have conflicting Water Supply test Data attributed to Tucson Water and Phoenix Water. Please contact Tucson Fire for water supply data (520-837-7029 or 520-837-7930).

Sheets E 4.1 and E 5.1
1. All dwelling units shall be provided with the capability to be equipped with visual alarm notification. See IFC 907.10.1.4.
03/01/2011 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved
03/11/2011 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied need to build public sewer- need public sewer construction permit - need hold harmless letter - connecting with 1-8" private hcs to newly constructred public on-site manhole - need DEQ review & approval of on-site private sewer (if over 3000 gal/day).
need PCRWRD 3rd floor capcity review- Chad Amateau- 740-6547
03/11/2011 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied T11CM00617
795 W Congress
Senior Housing Apartments

Electrical plans denied for the following, please indicate how each was addressed.

1.Provide information on the types of wiring methods to be used , please consider different locations within the building.
2. Sheet E4.1 individual calculations for units A and B
shown are 18.2 kva and 18.1, the total load calculations use 23 kva and 22.8 kva on sheets E7.1, 21.1 kva and 20.9 kva
on Sheet E7.3. These are the same units, please explain.
3. Sheet E4.1 shows the panels as being single phase the main disconnects for units are shown as 3 phase with single phase feeds. Why are the disconnects not single phase.
4. Provide a calculation showing the distribution of loads between phases, I presume the will alternate.
5. Sheet E4.1 kitchen counter, area where receptacle shown for dishwasher, may need to provide a kitchen counter receptacle per 2005 NEC 210.52.C.
6. Closet lights do not appear to comply with 2005 NEC 410.8.
7. Sheet E6.1, rather than indicate on top of panels that they are to be duplicates, please draw in these panels along side the others.
8. Sheet E6.1, panels HP3A and HP5A are indicated to be duplicate, the show different loads. 32 amps and 81 amps ?
9. Sheet E6.1, why so many ExFans numbered 10 and 11, should they be numerical ?
10. Sheets E7.1 and E7.3, provide notation indicating a
plaque to be provided , indicating where other services are located on site.
11. Entrances to electrical rooms to have panic hardware or equivalent per 2005 NEC 110.26.C.2, indicate on plan.
12. Provide specification sheets on Fire and Jockey Pumps,
and Controllers.
13.Provide notation on Fire Pump Service , installation to comply fith NEC 695, and NFPA 20.
14.NEC 695.6.B, Fire Pump supply conductors on the load side of final disconnect means being routed through building to be in a fire rated enclousure ?

Ray T Majuta,
Elect Plan Review,
PDSD, City of Tucson,
3/16/11,
Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.com
03/17/2011 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Denied 03/17/2011

Development Services Department
Zoning Review Section

Terry Stevens
Lead Planner

Comments:

1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.
03/17/2011 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied GENERAL
1. Please provide an approved site development plan.
2. Please provide a letter to the building official, Mr. Ron Boose outlining all the deferred submittals for the purpose of addition plan review fee assessment.
3. Please provide Special Inspection Certifications as outlined per sheets S1.0 and S1.1.
4. Please provide a geo-technical soils report.
5. Please provide structural calculations for the following:
a. Exterior light pole foundations
SHEET A0.2
6. The 2 hour exterior bearing walls may be 1 hour as per 2006 IBC, Table 6, Note "b".
7. For the Accessible Summary Count schedule, please provide a full unit accounting of total units, total type "A" units and total type "B" units; show number required by code and number provided.
8. Your Summary of Governing Regulations shows three accessibility regulations. Please pick one and delete the other two. If any code other than ICC (ANSI 117.1) is selected, please file an appeal to the building official.

PROJECT T11CM00617
SENIOR HOUSING APARTMENTS
STRUCTURAL REVIEW

9. SHEET S2.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); SCHNEIDER STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 37): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE THE ENTRANCE CANOPY COLUMN (C4 ON THE DRAWING) IS A HSS3X3X3/8, WHILE THE DRAWING INDICATES A HSS3X3X3/16. CLARIFY.
10. SHEET S2.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); SHEET IS3.8 (ELEVATION R): THE SCHNEIDER STRUCTURAL PLAN INDICATES THE EXTERIOR WALL ON GRID N IS CMU, WHILE THE INTEGRA PLAN (WALL R) INDICATES INTEGRA. CLARIFY.
11. SHEETS S2.0 THROUGH S2.6 (PLANS); SHEET IS3.3 (ELEVATION E): THE SCHNEIDER STRUCTURAL PLANS INDICATE THE EXTERIOR WALL ON GRID 4 UP TO THE FIFTH FLOOR IS CMU, WHILE THE INTEGRA PLAN (WALL E) INDICATES INTEGRA FROM THE FIRST FLOOR TO THE ROOF. CLARIFY.
12. SHEETS S2.0 THROUGH S2.6 (PLANS); SHEET IS3.4 (ELEVATION G): THE SCHNEIDER STRUCTURAL PLANS INDICATE THE EXTERIOR WALL ON GRID 2 FROM THE FOUNDATION TO THE ROOF IS INTEGRA, WHILE THE INTEGRA PLAN (WALL G) INDICATES PIERS AT GRIDS D AND F ARE CMU FROM THE SECOND TO THE SIXTH FLOORS. CLARIFY.
13. SHEETS S2.0 THROUGH S2.6 (PLANS); SHEET IS3.5 (ELEVATION I): THE SCHNEIDER STRUCTURAL PLANS INDICATE THE EXTERIOR WALL NORTH OF GRID 2 FROM THE FOUNDATION TO THE ROOF IS INTEGRA, WHILE THE INTEGRA PLAN (WALL I) INDICATES PIERS AT GRIDS H AND K ARE CMU FROM THE SECOND TO THE SIXTH FLOORS. CLARIFY.
14. SHEETS S2.0 THROUGH S2.6 (PLANS); SHEET IS3.7 (ELEVATION N): THE SCHNEIDER STRUCTURAL PLANS INDICATE THE EXTERIOR WALL ON GRID Q FROM THE FOUNDATION TO THE ROOF IS INTEGRA, WHILE THE INTEGRA PLAN (WALL N) INDICATES PIERS AT GRIDS 6 AND 10 ARE CMU FROM THE SECOND TO THE SIXTH FLOORS. CLARIFY.
15. SHEET S2.1 (FRAMING PLAN); SCHNEIDER STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 26): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE BEAM B1 (B11 ON THE DRAWING) IS A HSS 16X4X1/4, WHILE THE DRAWING INDICATES A HSS16X4X3/16. CLARIFY.
16. SHEET S2.1 (FRAMING PLAN); SCHNEIDER STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 26): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE BEAM B2 (B11 ON THE DRAWING) IS A HSS16X4X1/4, WHILE THE DRAWING INDICATES A HSS 16X4X3/16. CLARIFY.
17. SHEET S2.1 (FRAMING PLAN); SCHNEIDER STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 26): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE BEAM B3 (B11 ON THE DRAWING) IS A W8X15, WHILE THE DRAWING INDICATES A HSS16X4X3/16. CLARIFY.
18. SHEETS S2.2/S2.3/S2.5: THE THREE STEEL COLUMNS IN THE EAST WING CORRIDOR (C5) ARE NOT NOTED ON THESE PLANS. VERIFY.
19. SHEET S2.6 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN); SCHNEIDER STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 39): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE THE SOLAR TRELLIS COLUMN BASE PLATES ARE 3/4"X16" SQUARE WITH 4-3/4" EXPANSION ANCHORS, WHILE THE DRAWING INDICATES A 1/2"X10"X0'-10" PLATE WITH 4-5/8" DIAMETER EXPANSION BOLTS. CLARIFY.
20. SHEET S2.6 (FRAMING PLAN); SCHNEIDER STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 2.3): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE LINTEL L8 AS A W12X16, WHILE THE DRAWING INDICATES A LT1 (PROVIDED BY INTEGRA). CLARIFY.
21. SHEET IS1.1; DETAIL 7 NOTES: NOTE 5 REFERENCES "SEE ENGINEERING NOTES". SPECIFICALLY CALL OUT THE NOTES OR REFERENCE A SHEET NUMBER.
22. SHEET IS2.1: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE DIMENSIONS.
23. SHEET IS3.7; STEEL LINTEL SCHEDULE: THE COMMENT FOR THE W12X16 LINTEL REFERENCES 3S/S1.3. REVISE.
24. SHEET IS3.9; ELEVATION T: IS THE PIER AT GRID 13 TO BE CMU FROM THE SECOND TO THE SIXTH FLOORS (PER WALLS G AND I)? VERIFY.
25. SCHNEIDER STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; SHEET 39: DID NOT LOCATE THE DESIGN OF THE SOLAR TRELLIS BEAMS (B6 AND B7 ON THE DRAWING S2.7). VERIFY.
26. GENERAL: USING THE KEY PLANS IN THE SCHNEIDER CALCULATIONS, INDICATE COLUMNS, WALLS, BEAMS, ETC., INCLUDED IN THE DESIGN CALCULATIONS FOR REVIEW.
27. GENERAL; SCHNEIDER STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS SHEETS 65 THROUGH 78: USE THE CALCULATION KEY PLANS TO LOCATE THESE BEAMS AND COLUMNS FOR REVIEW.
28. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.


END OF REVIEW
03/17/2011 BETH GRANT COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Completed
03/21/2011 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Denied The Fixture Unit Calculation on sheet P5.2 appears to offer the use of three 2" water meters in lieu of a single 3" water meter. Tucson Water has not allowed water meters and backflow preventers to be manifolded to achieve additional capacity since 2007. If you wish to offer this alternative, provide a letter from Tucson Water confirming that the use of three 2" water meters in lieu of a single 3" water meter will be allowed for this project.
03/22/2011 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope (use the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet). Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006.
2. Show how the condensing units, heat pumps, and exhaust fans are to be installed per code, the manufacturer's recommendations, and be coordinated with the installation of the solar panels. Reference: Sections 304.1 and 501.2, IMC 2006.
3. Provide a detail specifying the "mounting fasteners" for the fan coils (sheet M5.1) and showing how they are to be attached to the structure above. Reference: Sections 302.1 and 302.2, IMC 2006.
4. Revise the size of the condensate drains in accordance with Section 307.2.1, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
5. Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation and note the required amount of outside air to be provided to each fan coil unit. Reference: Section 403.3, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
6. Type I domestic dryers are not designed to be connected to a common exhaust duct serving multiple dryers but shall be independent of all other exhaust systems. Provide for termination of each dryer exhaust directly to the exterior of the building and be equipped with a backdraft damper. Reference: Sections 504.2 and 504.4, IMC 2006.
03/22/2011 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide the size of the floor drains located in the laundry rooms and in the public restrooms. Reference: Sections 412.3 and 412.4, IPC 2006.
2. Show that the entire laundry room floors will be drained by the proposed floor drains. Reference: Section 412.4, IPC 2006.
3. Provide a waste and vent schematic for the floor drain and floor sink located in the maintenance room; include the sizes of the fixtures, drains, and vents. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IPC 2006.
4. Revise the size of the water supply piping to the flush valve water closets (WC-3 and WC-4) to reduce the water velocity to less than 8 feet per second. Reference: Section 604.4, IPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
5. Provide water hammer arrestors for quick-closing valves (e.g. clothes washers). Reference: Section 604.9, IPC 2006.
6. Provide a low-pressure cut-off for the water booster pump system. Reference: Section 606.5.5, IPC 2006.
7. Provide a trap and vent for the floor sink located on the 6th floor. Reference: Sections 708.3, 901.2.1, and 1002.1, IPC 2006.
8. Provide sizing information for the roof scuppers for the terrace area, including calculations justifying scupper width. Reference: Section 1107.3, IPC 2006.
9. Note that Tables 12-3 and 12-4 in the 2006 UPC are not gas sizing tables.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
03/23/2011 GERARDO BONILLA OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
03/23/2011 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed