Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T10CM03525
Parcel: 10709092A

Address:
515 W KELSO ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T10CM03525
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/04/2011 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. SHEET 1g1.2; TYPICAL HEIGHTS: THE TOP OF THE WATER CLOSET SEAT (1'-7") IS FOR ADULTS. PER ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003, FIGURE 604.10.4, REVISE THE SEAT HEIGHT.
2. SHEET 1g1.2; TYPICAL HEIGHTS: VERIFY THE CENTERLINE OF THE TOILET PAPER DISPENSER MEETS REQUIREMENTS PER ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003, FIGURE 604.10.7.
3. SHEET 1g1.2; TYPICAL HEIGHTS: VERIFY THE DRINKING FOUNTAIN SPOUT HEIGHT FOR CHILDREN FOLLOWS ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003, SECTION 602.2(2).
4. SHEET g1.0 (PLUMBING FIXTURES); SHEET g1.1 (CODE ANALYSIS): THE PLUMBING FIXTURE TABLE INDICATES 340 OCCUPANTS IN THE ADDITION, WHILE THE CODE ANALYSIS INDICATES 470. CLARIFY AND REVISE FIXTURES AS REQUIRED.
5. SHEET g1.1; FIRST FLOOR PLAN: CHECK THE EXITING LOAD AT THE SOUTH EXIT (LISTED AS 182 PEOPLE). SHOULD THIS BE 282?
6. SHEET x1.0; KEYNOTES: KEYNOTE 32.17 REFERENCES GUARDRAIL DETAIL 9/x1.4. THIS DETAIL DOES NOT SHOW THE GUARDRAIL. REVISE.
7. SHEET S2.0 (SECOND FLOOR FRAMING); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 2): THE LOW ROOF FRAMING IN THE N.E. PORTION OF THE BUILDING APPEARS TO BE DIFFERENT ON THE DRAWINGS (STEEL BEAMS) THAN IN THE DESIGN CALCULATIONS (STEEL JOISTS). CLARIFY.
8. SHEET S6.0 (SECOND LEVEL STAIR); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 2): THE DRAWINGS INDICATE A SSB2 BEAM (C8X11.5) AT THE STAIR LANDING, WHILE THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A B1 BEAM (W12X14). CLARIFY.
9. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; SHEET 66: WHERE IS THIS RETAINING WALL LOCATED? PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE PLAN, OR PROVIDE A SECTION.
10. SHEET S2.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 103): FOOTING F2 IN THE CALCULATIONS (EAST WALL OF THE NORTH STAIR) INDICATES A 4'-0" FOOTING (F2) WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES A 3'-0" FOOTING (F1). CLARIFY.
11. SHEET S2.0 (SECOND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN); DETAIL 315: COMPLETE THIS DETAIL (SHOW B4 ON THE DETAIL AS INDICATED ON THE PLAN, AND SHOW B6 BEARING ON THE MASONRY WALL).
12. SHEET S2.0 (SECOND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN); DETAIL 315 SIM: COMPLETE THIS SIMILAR DETAIL (SHOW B5 AND B6 ON THE DETAIL AS INDICATED ON THE PLAN AT EACH END).
13. SHEET S3.0; DETAIL 108: THE NOTES INDICATE A NOTE 6. PROVIDE THAT NOTE ON THE DETAIL.
14. SHEET S3.0; DETAIL 111: THE NOTES INDICATE A NOTE 2. PROVIDE THAT NOTE ON THE DETAIL.
15. SHEET S4.0; DETAILS 202, 206, AND 207: ADD A REFERENCE TO NOTE 6 CONCERNING THE SPACING OF THE WELD PLATES PER THE SCHEDULE ON SHEET S1.6.
16. SHEET S5.0; DETAILS 302 AND 309: ADD A REFERENCE TO NOTE 9 CONCERNING THE SPACING OF THE WELD PLATES PER THE SCHEDULE ON SHEET S1.6.
17. SHEET S5.0; DETAIL 308: THE NOTES INDICATE A NOTE 8. PROVIDE THAT NOTE ON THE DETAIL.
18. SHEETS 1a1.0 AND 1a4.0; KEYNOTES: KEYNOTE 3.1 REFERENCES A DETAIL 7/1G9.0. REVISE.
19. SHEET 1a6.0; SECTION 1: COMPLETE THE SECTION CUT REFERENCE.
20. SHEET 1a6.0; KEYNOTES: KEYNOTE 3.2 REFERENCES A SHEET X1.3. REVISE.
21. SHEET 1a7.0; GENERAL NOTES: NOTE 1 REFERENCES A SHEET G1.1 FOR MOUNTING HEIGHTS. REVISE THE SHEET NUMBER.
22. SHEET 1a8.0; DOOR SCHEDULE: THE SCHEDULE INDICATES 9 DIFFERENT HARDWARE SETS. ARE THESE LISTED ON THE DRAWINGS, OR ONLY IN THE SPECIFICATIONS. PROVIDE A REFERENCE.
23. SHEETS 2a1.1 AND 2a7.0: THIS WORK WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE VALUATION FOR THIS ACTIVITY NUMBER. PROVIDE A VALUATION AMOUNT FOR MATERIALS AND LABOR FOR THE REMODELLING INDICATED ON SHEETS 2a1.1 AND 2a7.0.
24. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
01/07/2011 ELIZABETH LEIBOLD ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied FOR: Ryan Stucki, P.E., EEC
SUBJECT: Nash Elementary School Amphi Grading Review
REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold, P.E.
DATE: January 10, 2011
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T10BU01890 (grading), T10CM03525 (building)

SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received the submittal for the above referenced property and has reviewed the drainage statement prepared by EEC under T10OT02425. The AMPHI school projects are exempt from Zoning related requirements. Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department does not recommend approval of T10BU01890 or T10CM03525 until the following comments are addressed.

COMMENTS:
1) IBC Section 1803.3: Clarify on planview on sheets c2.0 and c4.0, on a details 1/c3.0 and 6/c3.0 on sheet c3.0, the extents of the stormwater and (on details) depth of flow during a 100-yr event. Limits of flow area should not be conveyed against retaining or building structures, to minimize impact to the building foundation from stormwater runoff in the proposed swale within 10-ft of the building structures.
2) On sheet c1.0, revise general note 1. Remove 1.C as 1:1(H:V) slopes are not allowed per geotechnical recommendations.
3) DS Sec.11-01: On c4.0, label grading limits, as well as Q100's entering and exiting the property.
4) As-built required prior to final grading inspection and shall show spot elevations that conform to intent of drainage design per approved grading plans and drainage report. Substantial conformance letter will be required from EOR. Submit project completion package prior to final grading inspection, including 2 copies as-built grading plans, 1 copy of drainage report (approved under T10OT02425), and 2 copies substantial conformance letter to permit clerks under T10BU01890. Final inspection can occur after as-builts are accepted.

Submit 2 copies of revised sheets and response letter. For any questions, call me at 837-4934.

Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM
Civil Engineer
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Department
01/10/2011 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Clarify which make-up water detail is to be installed in the janitor's closet: 9/1M2.0 or 1/1P2.0. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IPC 2006.
2. Clarify the design for the mounting shelf for the water heater; the detail shows four all-thread connectors attached (somehow) to overhead structure but the specified platform attaches to an adjacent wall. Provide structural details of the connection to the structure along with calculations to show that the water heater is safely supported. Reference: Sections 301.2 and 308.4, UPC 2006.
3. Show that the installation of the vacuum relief valve for the water heater complies with the manufacturer's listing requirements (i.e. no valves located between the vacuum relief valve and the water heater). Reference: Section 310.4, UPC 2006.
4. Show how the temperature of the hot water supply to the public lavatories is controlled. Reference: Section 416.5, IPC 2006 and Section 504.3, IECC 2006.
5. The plumbing fixture schedule calls for water supplies to be stubbed-out for the urinals but no fixture units are indicated. Include this future piping with the water distribution sizing calculations. Reference: Sections 106.3.1 and 604.3, IPC 2006.
6. Provide a cleanout at the junction of the building sewer and the building drain. Reference: Section 708.3.5, IPC 2006.
7. According to the note on sheet 1P1.0, the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole is 55.11' and states that a backwater valve is not required. According to the civil drawing, C2.0, however, the first floor elevation is only 50.30'. Clarify why a backwater valve is not required per Section 715.1, IPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
8. Show that the vent system has been sized per Section 916, IPC 2006.
9. Provide trap seal protection for the floor drains in the restrooms. Reference: Section 1002.4, IPC 2006.
10. Provide drainage for the entire roof (e.g. the area over the south end of the second floor corridor) so that excessive ponding does not occur. Reference: Section 1101.7, IPC 2006.
11. Provide calculations to support the primary scupper design with regard to the width of the scupper or provide structural calculations to show that the roof is capable of supporting the additional rain load caused by the increased ponding depth. (Note that a scupper acts as a weir, not a vertical or horizontal pipe.) Reference: Sections 1101.7, 1106.1, 1106.5, and 1107.3, IPC 2006, and Section 1611.1, IBC 2006.
12. Provide overflow roof drainage. Reference: Sections 1107.1 and 1107.2, IPC 2006.
13. Provide calculations to show that the size of the overflow in the primary scupper collector box has a drainage capacity equal to that of the properly-sized scupper. Reference: Sections 1107.1 and 1107.3, IPC 2006.
01/10/2011 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Denied The pressure loss calculations on sheet 1P2.0 indicate that the backflow preventer for the water service has a pressure drop of only 8.0 PSI. Provide listing information for the assembly. Reference: Sections 106.3.1 and 303.4, IPC 2006.
01/11/2011 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Revise sheets 1m1.0 and 1m1.1 so that the architectural backgrounds are legible. Reference: Section 106.1.1, IBC 2006
2. Provide the listing information for exhaust fan EF-2. The manufacturer's installation instructions shall be available on site during construction. Reference: Sections 301.4 and 923.1.1, IMC 2006.
3. Clarify the duct design for AH-4, AH-5, AH-11 and AH-12 with regard to the possible use of the corridors as return air ducts. Reference: Section 601.2, IMC 2006.
4. Modify the chilled water pipe insulation specification to comply with the requirements of Table 503.2.8, IECC 2006 for the sizes not included in Specification Section 230700, 2.2, A 1.
5. Chiller CH-1 is specified as having a full load efficiency of 8.1 EER (2.37 COP) which is less than the required minimum of 2.80 COP. If you are specifying a minimum IPLV of 15.4 EER, why is such a low full load efficiency being specified? Reference: Table 503.2.3 (7), IECC 2006.
01/12/2011 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Approv-Cond needs WWM credit evaluation- WW maps and records, 5th floor PWB - 740-6602 or 7740-6606
01/12/2011 LEERAY HANLY ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
12/22/2010 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
12/29/2010 LEERAY HANLY ZONING HC REVIEW Passed SEE BUILDING REVIEW FOR ACCESSIBILITY

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
01/14/2011 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
01/14/2011 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed