Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T10CM02874
Parcel: 116193760

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T10CM02874
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
12/02/2010 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Denied Please include the following fire sprinkler design criteria to the plans.
1. Flow data (static pressure, residual pressure, GPM)
Available from the Fire Department (520) 837-7029 or 837-7030.
2. The standard to be used in development of sprinkler system. (NFPA 13, NFPA 13R, or NFPA 13D)
3. The hazard classification of the building, including any special hazards.
4. The density required of the water supply.
Unable to find door schedule. Sheet A921 is incomplete. H-2 room needs panic hardware.
12/02/2010 RONALD BROWN ADA REVIEW Passed
12/02/2010 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC REVIEW Denied REFERENCE BUILDING COMMENTS
12/09/2010 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied SHEET LS101A
1. At the Code Summary listing, add ICC (ANSI 117.1, 2003 Edition).
SHEET A004
2. Generic code copied details are not acceptable. Please provide all accessible code compliance dimensions, accessories and requirements on the actual designed floor plan and interior elevations, Sheets A140 and A803.
3. Please finish all toilet elevations and details at sheet A803.
SHEET A603
4. Please finish the stair details.
SHEET A601
5. The partition reference "A-1" for all the fire rated partitions is not correct as per sheet A002.
SHEET A101B
6. The partition reference for the generator room does not indicate a 2 hour rated partition as required for this room.
SHEET A003
7. For all fire rated partitions please reference an acceptable tested assembly from an approved testing lab.
8. Please finish all details.
SHEET A602
9. Please finish all stair details.
SHEET A104A
10. Please provide a combination roof drain and overflow scupper detail.
SHEET 111 AND 112
11. Please coordinate all accessibility comments made for the Development Plan approval and include all changes on these documents.
SHEET A921
12. The door schedule is not complete. Need to show panic hardware on all required exit doors.
SHEET A920
13. Please finish the window schedule.
GENERAL
14. Please provide a summary of any and all deferred submittals in a written format and submit to the Building official for additional fee assessment.
15. Please provide all Special Inspection Certifications as required by section 106.1 and 1705.
16. Insure structural calculations are provided for the following:
a. Water heater wall support frame and brackets
b. All roof top mounted HVAC equipment
c. All electrical pole foundations for standards 20' a.f.g. and higher
d. All fencing 6' a.f.g. and higher
17. These drawings are somewhat incomplete. Please provide completed drawings for construction.


12-07-2010
T10CM02874
QIP 3 STORY OFFICE BUILDING
STRUCTURAL COMMENTS FOR THE SHELL AND CORE PERMIT
REVIEWED BY ERIC NEWCOMB

18. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; BUILDING A ROOF FRAMING: ARE THE SIX BEAMS (486, 529, 890, 902, PERIMETER ROOF BEAM, AND PERIMETER ROOF GIRDER) REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ENTIRE ROOF FRAMING? ARE THERE OTHER MISCELLANEOUS BEAMS AT THE ROOF THAT REQUIRE CALCULATIONS? VERIFY.
19. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; BUILDING A THIRD FLOOR FRAMING: ARE THE NINE BEAMS (325, 357, 379, 393, 405, 574, 644, PERIMETER FLOOR BEAM, AND PERIMETER FLOOR GIRDER) REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ENTIRE THIRD FLOOR FRAMING? ARE THERE OTHER MISCELLANEOUS BEAMS AT THE THIRD FLOOR THAT REQUIRE CALCULATIONS? VERIFY.
20. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; BUILDING A SECOND FLOOR FRAMING: ARE THE NINE BEAMS (336, 351, 362, 381, 509, 615, 723, PERIMETER FLOOR BEAM, AND PERIMETER FLOOR GIRDER) REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ENTIRE SECOND FLOOR FRAMING? ARE THERE OTHER MISCELLANEOUS BEAMS AT THE SECOND FLOOR THAT REQUIRE CALCULATIONS? VERIFY.
21. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; ANNEX ROOF FRAMING: IS THE ONE PAGE (TYPICAL ROOF JOIST) THE ONLY CALCULATION PROVIDED FOR THE ANNEX ROOF FRAMING? EXPAND CALCULATIONS.
22. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (GRAVITY COLUMN DESIGN SUMMARY); SHEET S101A (FOUNDATION PLAN): COLUMN F8 IN THE CALCULATIONS INDICATES A W10X49, WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES A HSS10X10X1/2. CLARIFY.
23. SHEET S102A; FRAMING PLAN: PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR THE CANOPY.
24. SHEET S102B (FRAMING PLAN); DETAIL 16/S301: DETAIL 16 INDICATES THE WALL IS REINFORCED CONCRETE. IS THIS A CMU WALL? VERIFY.
25. SHEET S102B; FRAMING PLAN: THE DRAWINGS SHOW NO FRAMING OR FOUNDATION FOR THE FUTURE ANNEX EXPANSION. VERIFY.
26. SHEET S103A; FRAMING PLAN: FINISH THE DETAIL CUT AT GRID E BETWEEN GRIDS 7 AND 8.
27. SHEET S105A; VSF PLANS: WHERE IS THIS STRUCTURE LOCATED? PROVIDE CALCULATIONS.
28. SHEET S112; DETAIL 6: THERE IS NO GRID REFERENCE AT THIS SECTION. REMOVE.
29. SHEET S112; ELEVATION 12: WHERE IS THIS ELEVATION REFERENCED (PLAN OR DETAIL)? CLARIFY.
30. SHEET S200; DETAIL 7A/7: CLEAR UP THE VERBIAGE FOR THE CONCRETE WALL REINFORCING.
31. SHEET S200; DETAILS 9 AND 10: THE TWO LINES OF FOOTING DIMENSIONS ON EACH DETAIL ARE NOT EQUAL. VERIFY.
32. SHEET S202; DETAIL 16: THE NOTE AT THE PC BEARING (REINFORCING PER SECTION 14/S200) IS NOT REQUIRED. VERIFY.
33. SHEET S202; ELEVATION 17: WHERE IS THIS ELEVATION REFERENCED (PLAN OR DETAIL)? CLARIFY.
34. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
END OF REVIEW
12/10/2010 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Project :T10CM02874
275 N Commerce Park LP


The electrical plans are incomplete , cannot make a complete review with out all electrical sheets. No other instructions were submitted with plans.

Ray T Majuta,
Electrical Plan Review,
PDSD, City of Tucson,
12/10/10,
Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov
12/13/2010 BETH GRANT COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Completed
12/14/2010 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied NEED TO PROVIDE PLUMBING FIXTURE SCHEDULE & PLUMBING FIXTURE FLOOR PLAN, TO INCLUDE THE TOTAL # OF ALL FIXTURES & DDRAIS DONNECTED TO THE SEWER SYSTEM, INDICATE WASTE PIPE SIZES & INDIRECT DRAINS.
SUMP PUMPS ARE NOT ALLOAWED TO CONNECT TO SANITARY SEWER UNLESS ELEVATORS AND THE DISCHARGE SHALL FIRSTR PASS THROUGH AN APPROVED OIL & SAAND INTERCEPTOR.
NEED REVIEW/APPROVAL FOR A LARGE LINE TAP PERMIT (12" OR LARGER) OR MANHOLE TAP /CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FROM WW PCRWRD CONSTRUCTION SEC.- 1ST FL PWB- 740-6369. (ONLY ACCESSIBLE SEWER APPEARS TO BE 42" & MAY NEED A MANHOLE CONSTRUCTED.)
12/14/2010 ELIZABETH EBERBACH ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved Engineering to stamp after revision is submitted addressing other reviewers' denial comments.
12/27/2010 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: T10CM02874
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 27, 2010

1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section and the plans appear to be approvable but due to the amount of comments by other PDSD agencies Zoning will not stamp and approve the plans at this time.

3. Once an approvable set of drawings is submitted Zoning will approve the plans.

4. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped Development Paclage. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956

C:\planning\grading\t10cm002874.doc
12/28/2010 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide construction documents drawn with sufficient detail and clarity (e.g. legible backgrounds, column lines, etc.) to demonstrate that the work complies with the applicable codes. Reference: Section 106.1.1, IBC 2006.
2. Provide energy code compliance calculations (using Pima County < 4,000 feet). Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006.
3. The minimum insulation for ducts located in indirectly conditioned spaces within the building envelope is R-4.2 (installed). Reference: Section 503.2.7, IECC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
4. Provide vertical dirt legs for the refrigerant relief pipes for chiller CH-1. Reference: Section 304.1, IMC 2006.
5. Provide information to show that a machinery room is not required for the refrigeration equipment located inside the building. Reference: Section 1104.2, IMC 2006.
12/28/2010 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide a site drawing showing the size, route, and slope of the building sewer. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
2. Provide a complete plumbing plan, including water distribution isometrics and waste and vent isometrics. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
3. Show that the restroom floors slope toward the floor drains. Reference: Section 411.2, UPC 2006.
4. Equipment (e.g. boilers) to be directly connected to the water supply system that do not have listed, integral backflow preventers or integral air gaps conforming to Table 6-3, UPC 2006 require backflow prevention. Specify the type of backflow prevention device required for each water connection. Reference: Sections 602.3, 603.0, and Table 6-2, UPC 2006.
5. Provide CW shut off valves for each building entrance. Reference: Section 605.2, UPC 2006.
6. Provide water pressure and water pipe sizing calculations. Include all fixtures and the estimated demand for HVAC equipment and process equipment when calculating the total demand and determining the pipe sizes. Reference: Section 610.1, UPC 2006.
7. Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole and the first floor elevation. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
8. Provide a natural gas piping design, including a natural gas schematic showing the sizes, loads and developed lengths of the piping. Reference: Sections 103.2.3 and 1217.0, UPC 2006.
9. Provide roof drainage calculations and plans for areas B (primary and secondary) and C (primary) of the building. All roof areas shall be drained by roof drains, scuppers, or gutters. Reference: Section 1101.11.1, UPC 2006.
10. The architectural plans indicate that the overflow drainage for area C will be accommodated with overflow scuppers. Detail N7/A503 indicates a height of 4" for each scupper but does not show a width for each scupper. Provide the width for each scupper. Reference: Section 1101.11.2.1, UPC 2006.
11. Clarify the horizontal rainwater conductors shown along column line "O" on sheet P203A. The two horizontal conductors are both labeled as 6"RWC. Are the two roof drains and two overflow roof drains being combined or is it a drafting issue? Show how expansion/contraction of the pipe will be accommodated. Reference: Sections 103.2.3, 313.2, and 1101.11.2.2, UPC 2006.
12/28/2010 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Denied 1. Provide a site drawing showing the size and route of the building water supply along with the location and size of both the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006 and COT Backflow Prevention Ordinance, http://www.tucsonaz.gov/water/docs/backflow-ord.pdf
2. Provide the projected water demand for this building. Reference: Sections 610.1 and 610.2, UPC 2006.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
01/13/2011 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
01/13/2011 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed