Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T10CM02692
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/19/2010 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 11/24/2010 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/24/2010 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | The appeal for the second level breakroom occupancy load change from 79 to 30 has been denied. Please redesign breakroom to be code compliant. Either add another exit stair or reduce the size of the room for a 1/15 = 30 occupant load. |
| 11/29/2010 | RONALD BROWN | HC | REVIEW | Denied | Reference Building Comments |
| 11/30/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Provide documentation of the furring of the office exterior walls and provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope (e.g. call out the insulation for the furring and for the roof). Reference: Section 104.2, IECC 2006. |
| 11/30/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/30/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the water pressure calculations to include the pressure drop due to the additional, 2" reduced pressure backflow preventer located at the building. Reference: Section 610.2, UPC 2006. 2. Fixtures located on floor levels above the first floor elevation of the building shall not drain through the backwater valve. Reference: Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 3. Comment not resolved. The scupper width (6") appears to be too short to accommodate the design rainfall. Provide calculations to support the scupper design or provide structural calculations to show that the roof is capable of supporting the additional rain load. Reference: Sections 1101.11.1 and 1101.11.2.1, UPC 2006, and Section 1611.1, IBC 2006. |
| 12/05/2010 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Project: T10CM02692 6601 S Renaissance Dr Tucson Precision Products The electrical plans have been denied for the following: 1. NEC 2005 230.2(c)(1) " Where capacity requirements are in excess of 2000 amperes at a supply voltage of 600 volts or less", then a second service can be permitted. Your plan indicates existing service at 909 amps, and new this permit at 965 amps totaling 1874 amps. Future Load inserted at 498 amps. Currently the total does not equal or surpass the 2000 amps required. In this case you need to obtain "special permission" which requires an appeal to the Building Official. Ray T Majuta, PDSD, City of Tucson, Elect Pln Ck, 12/05/10 Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/08/2010 | GBONILL1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Needs Review |