Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T10CM02692
Parcel: 138240790

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW

Permit Number - T10CM02692
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/28/2010 RONALD BROWN ADA REVIEW Passed
09/29/2010 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Denied Please include the following fire sprinkler design criteria to the plans.
1. Flow data (static pressure, residual pressure, GPM)
Available from the Fire Department (520) 837-7029 or 837-7030.
2. The standard to be used in development of sprinkler system. (NFPA 13, NFPA 13R, or NFPA 13D)
3. The hazard classification of the building, including any special hazards.
4. The density required of the water supply.
Please indicate existing fire hydrant location(s), with dimensions to buildings and/or property lines. Refer to City of Tucson amendments to the 2006 International Fire Code (section 508) for spacing and location requirements.
Plans indicate existence of security gate(s). Refer to City of Tucson amendments to the 2006 International Fire Code (Sections 503.6.1 and 503.6.2) for requirements. Indicate methods of compliance on plans.
No Parking - Fire lane signs required to maintain fire access around building. Please indicate on plans.
Plans indicate a "chemical area". Please indicate types and quantities of chemicals.
It appears there is insufficient exiting. Exits on east side and south side are not 1/3 the diagonal distance apart, therefore they count as one exit. No exit signs entering production office. Please include an exiting diagram, with occupant loads and travel distances.
The break room, being enclosed, counts as a second floor. Per 2006 IFC, table 1019.2, maximum occupant load would be 30. Plans show seating for 48. Two exits would be required.
10/05/2010 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. This activity has been reviewed to the 2006 Uniform Plumbing Code with Local Amendments, the applicable code for all commercial plumbing projects. Provide an approved appeal to the building official if the plans are to be reviewed to the 2006 IPC.
2. Show the location and the piping (i.e. supply, waste, and vent) for the water fountains. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
3. Show how the carriers specified for the water closets are expected to fit within the plumbing wall provided between the new restrooms. Reference: Sections 103.2.3 and 310.4, UPC 2006.
4. Provide a fixture description for sink SK-2. Reference: Section 401.1, UPC 2006.
5. Show how the temperature of the hot water supply to the public lavatories is controlled. Reference: Section 413.1, UPC 2006 and Section 504.3, IECC 2006.
6. Specify the termination height of the water heater flue. Reference: Section 510.6.2, UPC 2006.
7. Clarify the gas input required for water heater WH-1; the gas piping notes on sheet P1 indicate an input of 200 CFH but WH-1 is specified as having an input of 85 MBH on sheet P4. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
8. Equipment to be directly connected to the water supply system that does not have a listed, integral backflow preventer or an integral air gap conforming to Table 6-3, UPC 2006 requires backflow prevention. Specify the type of backflow prevention device required for each water connection. Reference: Sections 602.3, 603.0, and Table 6-2, UPC 2006.
9. Each piece of equipment requiring backflow protection shall be independently protected. Reference: Sections 602.2 and 603.0, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
10. Two of the specified fixtures (water closets and urinal) require a minimum pressure greater than the 15-PSI used in the water pipe sizing calculations. Revise calculations as necessary. Reference: Section 608.1, UPC 2006.
11. Revise the static lift used for the water pressure calculations to consider the height of the water outlets for the evaporative coolers. Reference: Section 610.1, UPC 2006.
12. Include the estimated demand for HVAC equipment and process equipment when determining the water demand for the building supply. Reference: Section A2, UPC 2006.
13. Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole and the first floor elevation. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
14. The natural gas piping system is shown with a total load of 13, 396 CFH with a developed length of 450 feet. How is the gas piping for the existing building related to the new gas piping? Reference: Sections 103.2.3, 1209.1.1, and 1209.1.2, UPC 2006.
15. Provide overflow roof drains. Reference: Section 1101.11.2, UPC 2006.
10/05/2010 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Revise the energy code analysis, coordinating the building components used in the analysis with those shown on the drawing (e.g. windows, store front, etc.). Reference: Section 502, IECC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
2. Provide documentation of the u-factor for the roof as stated in footnote b of the COMcheck envelope compliance certificate and provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. Reference: Section 104.2, IECC 2006.
3. Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation. Reference: Section 403.0, IMC 2006.
4. Provide a Type II hood for the three microwave ovens in the break room. Reference: Section 507.2.2, IMC 2006.
10/05/2010 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Denied 1. Show the location and the size of the water meter that will service this building addition. If the existing water meter will be serving both the existing building and the addition, provide the total connected water demand that will result from the addition of this activity. Reference: Sections 610.1 and 610.2, UPC 2006.
2. Reduced pressure backflow prevention assemblies are required to be installed in locations accessible to Tucson Water. Reference: COT Backflow Prevention Ordinance, http://www.tucsonaz.gov/water/docs/backflow-ord.pdf
10/05/2010 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Project:T10CM02692
6601 S Renaissance
Precision Products

The electrical plans have been denied for the following:

1. Sheet E-6, the service should be labeled 277/480 Volts rather 120/208 Volts.
2. Sheet E-2 shows an existing SES in an existing electrical room, How would two electrical services be allowed under 2005 NEC 230.2. Under what exception is second SES being installed ?
3. If second SES was allowed, ( would be by special permission), the two services would not comply with 2005 NEC, 230.70.
4. If second SES allowed, would the grounding system of both services need to be tied together per 2005 NEC 250.58 ?
5. Sheet E-2, Circuit L3-2 used to feed dock-leveler, shown as spare in panel.
6. Sheet E-5, L1-28,30 feed CU-6, in panel only cir 24 feeds CU-6.
7. Sheet E-5, H2-20,22,24 same cir feeds two EC's, 4 and 7.
8. Sheet E-7, 16,18 shown as spares but have loads.
9. Sheet E-5 shows H1-14,16,18,feeding EF's 1,2,3. The panel schedule shows circuits 16 and 18 as spares.

Ray T Majuta,PDSD, City Of Tuc,
Elect Pln Ck,
10/12/10,
Ray>Majuta@tucsonaz.gov
10/15/2010 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Precision Products Building Expansion
T10CM02692
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 15, 2010

1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. The building plans appear to be in compliance with the last submitted Development plan, D10-0017. At this time the Development plan has not been approved by all PDSD agencies therefore zoning cannot approve the building plans.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped Development Plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956

C:\planning\grading\t10cm002692.doc
10/15/2010 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Approv-Cond Approved-cond. upon the approval of the site plan.
10/19/2010 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Please provide a summary of the chemicals to be used and their quantities.
2. This project will require a new Certificate of Occupancy for the entire building. Please provide a total building square footage analysis concurrent with a new total building occupancy load calculation. Please make distinctions between the new and existing facilities and the different occupancy uses.
3. Your exiting appears inadequate. Please provide a total complex exiting plan showing the existing and new addition.
4. Please provide an existing/demolition floor plan.
5. Please provide a letter to the Building Official summarizing any and all deferred submittals for additional fee assessment.
6. Please provide completed special inspection certifications as per the 2006 IBC chapter 17 for review and approval.
7. Second Level Break Room:
a. Your occupancy load calculations indicates 14.5 occupants
b. Your 2nd floor plan shows a table and chair layout for 48.
c. The 2006 IBC, Table 1004.1.1 allows you, as an assembly with tables and chairs, to have 1/15 or 96 total occupants
d. Any load above 30 requires two separate exit stairs.
e. If you require an occupancy load less than what the IBC allows, please submit a appeal to the Building Official.
f. Please recalculate the occupancy load for this space as required by the 2006 IBC.
8. Included in your Sheet T1, Means of Egress calculation is a Retail category. Please explain.
SHEET A2
9. Generic details are not acceptable. Please combine those accessible details copied from the code book with the actual designed toilet elevations.
10. Detail 3/A.2:
a. Accessible toilet stalls must comply with the 2006 IBC, ICC (ANSI 117.1), Section 604.5 and figure 604.8.2.
b. Please show an "L" shaped seat in the accessible shower as per ICC (ANSI 117.1), Section 610.
c. Please show all required accessible dimensions on the floor plan.
d. The entry vestibules for both toilet rooms do not comply with ICC (ANSI 117.1), Section 404.2.5.
e. Show location, heights and dimensions of all toilet accessories on the designed toilet elevations.
f. Elevation 5 and 6 are not a true reflection of the actual design as per the floor plan. Please reconcile.
1. Bench seat shown in wrong location. Reference 610.3.2
2. Seat must be "L" shaped as per 602.
h. There are no vertical grab bars shown in the shower as required by Section 608.2.
11. Provide structural calculations for all roof top mounted HVAC equipment.
12. In the structural calculation manual:
a. There are no calculations for DW1, DW2 or DW3.
b. There are no calculations for DL4
13. At F5 on Sheet s2.0 at the second floor foundation footing schedule calls for 1'-6" wide while the calculations call for 2'-6" wide.
14. Please recalculate the foundation for the covered chemical area. What is shown in calculations and on foundation plan are two different designs.
END OF COMMENTS
10/21/2010 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC REVIEW Denied Reference Building comments
10/21/2010 BETH GRANT COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Completed
10/25/2010 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied need to indicate where sump pump at loading dock is to discharge. These areas are not sstandaardly allowed to be connected to the public sewer.
need to get capacity evaluaation by Kurt Stemm- 3rd floor public works build- 443-6200

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
10/28/2010 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
10/28/2010 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed