Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T10CM02634
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/05/2011 | BEVERLEY HESTER | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Project: Site plan T10CM02634 (Third Review) 643 W. Ajo Way DATE: May 5, 2011 FROM: Beverley Hester, Engineering Division Summary of Review This review is from the Planning and Development Services Department's Engineering Division for the site plan only. A re-submittal is required. Please include a response letter to the comments detailed below in your next submittal. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan A. The Site Plan cannot be approved as submitted. B. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the Site Plan. C. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. D. Depending on how all comments are addressed, additional comments may be forth coming. E. A grading permit is needed. Site Plan Comments from "City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-02.0 Site Plan Content and Specifications" 1. An easement is needed for the sidewalk portion located on private property. (This plan will be conditionally approved but a CofO will not be issued until the easement has been recorded and the sequence number is shown on the plans.) 2. A grading permit is required based on cut (16) & fill (38) quantities. 16 + 38 = 54 >50 a) Submit an application fees for a grading permit b) Add grading notes; " "The approved Grading Plan is the only acceptable construction plan onsite. The Contractor may not use any other plans, such as the approved Tentative Plat and/or Development Plan, for construction purposes. The Contractor may ask the Development Services Inspector to consult with the other approved plans for additional information or details that might not be included on the approved grading plan but needed for completion of work." " "The contractor shall remove the fine materials from the bottom of the landscape water harvest areas and scarify the bottom of each once the construction activities are completed in order to remove any fine material build up caused by construction and to restore soil percolation." " "Any engineering work to be done below grade (i.e. toe-downs, cutoff walls, drainage pipes/structures, etc.) shall not be back filled until Planning and Development Services Inspector inspects the work and approves it." 3. New Comment; Correct note # 2. It shows the entire site is 0.35 acres and the entire site 0.35 is going to be disturbed. However, the plans do not agree with this. Please contact me or Paul Machado if you have any questions regarding the engineering comments for this project. I can be reached at 837-4935 or Bev.Hester@tucsonaz.gov and Paul can be reached at 837-4932 Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Respectfully, Beverley Hester City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Department Engineering Division 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4935 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
| 05/13/2011 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The Following comment is a Land Use Code requirement. A variance or administrative decision must be obtained. 2. Site & landscape plans are required indicating how the project will comply with LUC requirements when the MS&R right-of-way can no longer be used as part of the site. Such plan is to be an exhibit to an executed covenant for recordation stating the responsibility of the property owner, successor, or assignee as to the removal of improvements and compliance with the LUC at no cost to the City. Include covenant and future site & landscape plans with next submittal for review LUC 2.8.3.5.F 3. Include with re-submittal approval documentation. Indicate on the lower right hand corner of the site plan, the variance case number, date of approval, and any conditions imposed. 4. Additional comments may apply |
| 05/16/2011 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Referenc Zoning requirements for separation of pedestrian ways and PAALs for the walk area East of The proposed canopy. 2. As per the grade elevation shown on the site plan, sheet C-2, the slope of accessible parking space and aisle does not meet slope requirements as per ICC (ANSI 117.1), Section 502.5 and as per detail E/C-3. 3. Identify the one accessible space as "Van Accessible". 4. Provide the "Van Accessible" sign on the post at detail D/C-2. END OF REVIEW |
| 05/16/2011 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Ajo Transmission T10CM02634 Site Plan (3rd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 17, 2011 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance for the entire site. 2. This comment was not completely addressed. The future site plan does not meet the requirements of D.S. 2-02.0, this includes all required calculation. Also a copy of the recorded Major Streets and Routes Covenant was not provided along with recordation information on the plan. As Ajo Way is a designated Gateway Arterial Street on the City of Tucson Major Streets and Routes Map this project must either be designed to meet the future right-of-way or a future site plan must be provided that shows how the proposed project will meet the Land Use requirements when the street is widened. If not designing to the future right-of-way a recorded Major Streets and Routes Covenant is required. Provide a copy of the recorded covenant and provide a note on the site plan stating "MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES COVENANT RECORED UNDER DKT ### & PAGE ##. 3. This comment was not addressed. Provide a note on the plan stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES (MS&R) SETBACK ZONE; SEC. 2.8.4, GATEWAY CORRIDOR ZONE; SEC. 2.8.5". 4. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 Demonstrate on the plan how the requirements of Ordinance 10886 LUC Section 3.3.9.2.A.7 are met. Also for your information per Ordinance 10886 LUC Section 3.3.9.2.B.4 a single rack can hold two (2) bicycles. 5. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Per D.S. 2-08.4.1.B A sidewalk will be provided adjacent and parallel to any PAAL on the side where buildings are located. That said provide a 4' sidewalk, physically separated from the PAAL, along the east side of the proposed canopy. Per LUC Section 6.2.2 DEFINITIONS - B., Building. A structure having a roof supported by columns, posts, or walls and intended for the shelter, housing, or enclosure of any person, entity, animal, process, equipment, goods, or materials of any kind or nature. That said provide a sidewalk along the east side of the proposed canopy. 6. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 Provide the recordation information for the easement shown under keynote 8. A access easement is required for the sidewalk shown at the northeast corner of the plan. Show the easement on the plan along with the recordation information, docket and page. 7. Once the above comments have been addressed zoning is willing to provide and over-the-counter review. Please call or email to schedule this review. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\site\t10cm02634 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan. |
| 05/26/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved |