Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T10CM02634
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/05/2011 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Ajo Transmission T10CM02634 Site Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 5, 2011 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance for the entire site. 2. This comment was not addressed. As Ajo Way is a designated Gateway Arterial Street on the City of Tucson Major Streets and Routes Map this project must either be designed to meet the future right-of-way or a future site plan must be provided that shows how the proposed project will meet the Land Use requirements when the street is widened. If not designing to the future right-of-way a recorded Major Streets and Routes Covenant is required. Provide a copy of the recorded covenant and provide a note on the site plan stating "MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES COVENANT RECORED UNDER DKT ### & PAGE ##. 3. This comment was not addressed. Provide a note on the plan stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES (MS&R) SETBACK ZONE; SEC. 2.8.4, GATEWAY CORRIDOR ZONE; SEC. 2.8.5". 4. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 Provide the height of proposed structure on the site plan. 5. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Provide typical parking space details for both handicapped and standard spaces, together with access thereto. 6. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 The wheel stop location dimension shown on detail B sheet C-1 is not correct. See D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.2. 7. This comment was not addressed. As the proposed use is "AUTOMOTIVE - SERVICE AND REPAIR - MAJOR" not 'TRANSPORTATION SERVICES" the following bicycle requirements must be met. Per Ordinance #10886 Section 3.3.8.2.B "COMMERCIAL USE GROUP" two (2) short-term (Class 2) and two (2) long-term (Class 1) are required. Show the location for both the short-term and long-term on the plan. Provide a detail for both the short-term and long-term on the plan that meets the requirements of Ordinance #10886 Section 3.3.9. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 Show the required bicycle parking on the plan. Keynote 14 does not appear on the plan. Provide the following info for the off-street bicycle parking; materials for lighting, paving, and security; fully dimensioned layout; location; specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports. 8. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10 The existing sight visibility triangle (SVT) does not appear to be shown correctly. Once shown correctly it appears that vehicle parking space 10 encroaches into the SVT. A vehicle parking space may not encroach into the SVT see D.S. 5.1.A.1. 9. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Per D.S. 2-08.4.1.B A sidewalk will be provided adjacent and parallel to any PAAL on the side where buildings are located & per D.S. 3-05.2.2.B.1 A minimum setback distance of five (5) feet for a pedestrian refuge area must be maintained between any enclosed structure and a PAAL. That said provide the required sidewalk and five (5) foot refuge along the east side of the proposed building. 10. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 The striped access aisle running from the southern most accessible vehicle parking space access aisle to the southeast corner of the proposed building presents a safety issue as it runs into a bay door. 11. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Provide some type of barrier to prevent vehicles from accessing the unpaved areas along the east property line, see D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.1. 12. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Provide some type of barrier to prevent vehicles from accessing the unpaved areas along the west property line at the accessible space access aisle area, see D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.1. 13. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Provide a PAAL width dimension form the northwest end of vehicle parking space #9 to the striped area, required sidewalk see comment 8. 14. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 A access easement is required for the sidewalk shown at the northeast corner of the plan. Show the easement on the plan along with the recordation information, docket and page. 15. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 Revise the vehicle and bicycle parking calculations to reflect the correct use "AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE AND REPAIR MAJOR". 16. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 The bicycle parking calculation is not correct see comment 7 above. 17. Depending on how all comments are addressed additional comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\site\t10cm02634 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan. |
| 04/07/2011 | BEV HESTER | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Project: Site plan T10CM02634 (Second Review) 643 W. Ajo Way DATE: April 13, 2011 FROM: Beverley Hester, Engineering Division Note: First review comments are included followed by the status of each comment (such as 'completed' or 'not needed') &/or additional comments added and noted. Summary of Review This review is from the Planning and Development Services Department's Engineering Division for the site plan only. A re-submittal is required. Please include a response letter to the comments detailed below in your next submittal. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan A. The Site Plan and Drainage Statement cannot be approved as submitted. B. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the Site Plan. C. Please include a Drainage Report with the next submittal (Not Needed.) D. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. E. Depending on how all comments are addressed, additional comments may be forth coming. F. An electrical permit is needed to upgrade 200 amp electrical circuit to 400 amp electrical circuit as shown on Note 20. G. New Comment; A grading permit is needed Site Plan Comments from "City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-02.0 Site Plan Content and Specifications" 1. Provide all existing (completed) and proposed buildings and structures, including location (completed), size (completed), height, overhangs, canopies (completed), and use (D.S. 2-02.2.1.6). 2. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles (D.S. 2-02.2.1.10) (see zoning reviewer comment). 3. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified (D.S. 2-02.2.1.12) (Completed.) a. An access ramp will be needed on the sidewalk at the NE entrance. (Completed.) b. An easement is needed for the sidewalk portion located on private property. (This plan will not be approved until the easement has been recorded and the sequence number is shown on the plans.) c. Provide documentation/approval from City of Tucson's Department of Transportation for the sidewalk configuration on the NE portion of the property. (Documentation provided by DOT does not discuss or approve the sidewalk configuration.) 4. Fully dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) (D.S. 2-02.2.1.14). (Completed.) a. Provide the radii's of the alley/road on the south side for service vehicles accessing the dumpster. The minimum inside curb radii is 34' and the outside radii is 50'. (Completed.) 5. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities (D.S. 2-02.2.1.17). (Completed.) a. New Comment; A grading permit is required based on cut & fill quantities. 6. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way (D.S. 2-02.2.1.19). (Completed.) a. The future right of way width for Ajo Way is 120'. (Completed.) b. Show the future curb location. (Show dimension width between future curb location and future right of way.) c. Show the intersection widening. (Completed.) 7. All easement of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page (sequence number) (D.S. 2-02.2.1.20). (This permit will not be approved until then.) 8. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines (D.S. 2-02.2.1.21). (Completed.) Drainage Report: Completed Other Engineering Comments a. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. b. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". (Completed.) c. Describe the dashed rectangles in the concrete slab and the work areas. (Acknowledged.) d. Pedestrian access to the dumpster is needed. (Completed.) e. Show scuppers and roof drainage. 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers and/or sidewalk scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof drain/sidewalk scupper locations have been designed and located and that the 10-year flow must be conveyed under any other sidewalks and/or pedestrian paths will suffice. f. Show the minimum in width for dumpster approach of 40' straight back. g. Dimension dumpster detail as re-lined. (Completed.) h. "Thicken edge Detail A" on sheet C-2 does not match Detail "A" on sheet C-3. (Completed.) i. Remove electrical components from the site plan. These should be on the building plan with an electric permit. j. New Comment; Key notes need to reflect that 8" x 8" x 16" CMU block will be used. k. New Comment; Call out edge type on the east edge of the driveway. l. New Comment; Call out wall opening height on Note 16. m. A grading plan is required for this project. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding the engineering comments for this project. I can be reached at 837-4935 or Bev.Hester@tucsonaz.gov. Respectfully, Beverley Hester City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Department Engineering Division 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4935 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
| 04/08/2011 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Only one accessible parking space is required. Please delete the accessible space next to the trash enclosure. 2. The Site plan on sheet C-2 is not to scale. Please provide all plans to scale. 3. The West wall of the new building will have to be fire rated as required by the 2006 IBC, Table 602. 4. The accessible route to the accessible parking space does not work. Reference attached sketch, SUGGESTION ONLY. a. Provide pedestrian way to dumpster as required by Zoning. This is not required to be accessible. END OF REVIEW |
| 04/13/2011 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Since constraints prohibits the site to meet future conditions then the following code section applies: Site & landscape plans are required indicating how the project will comply with LUC requirements when the MS&R right-of-way can no longer be used as part of the site. Such plan is to be an exhibit to an executed covenant for recordation stating the responsibility of the property owner, successor, or assignee as to the removal of improvements and compliance with the LUC at no cost to the City. Include covenant and future site & landscape plans with next submittal for review LUC 2.8.3.5.F 2. Plant materials located within sight visibility triangles should consist of ground cover or low-growing vegetation of a species that will not grow higher than thirty (30) inches. Some Leucophyllum species will grow in excess of 5' whereas Leucopphyllum candidum Thunder Cloud will only reach a height of 3'. Specify species of plants and if necessary revise location. 3. Trees that are located in areas of required landscaping will be a minimum fifteen (15) gallon container size DS 2-06.3.5.C. Revise planting plan as necessary 4. Shrubs within the street landscape buffer shall be five (5) gallon container size or larger. DS 2-06.3.5.F. Revise planting plan as necessary. Revise planting plan as necessary. 5. Additional comments may apply |
| 04/14/2011 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | Exception |
| 04/27/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (2438.90') is higher than the first floor elevation (2437.15'). Add a note to the drawing stating that a backwater valve for the building sewer will be required per Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. |