Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T10CM02634
Parcel: 12002035B

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T10CM02634
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/22/2010 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
09/22/2010 SREEVES1 ADA REVIEW Passed
09/27/2010 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Ajo Transmission
T10CM02634
Site Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 27, 2010

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance for the entire site.

2. As Ajo Way is a designated Gateway Arterial Street on the City of Tucson Major Streets and Routes Map this project must either be designed to meet the future right-of-way or a future site plan must be provided that shows how the proposed project will meet the Land Use requirements when the street is widened.

3. Provide a note on the plan stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES (MS&R) SETBACK ZONE; SEC. 2.8.4, GATEWAY CORRIDOR ZONE; SEC. 2.8.5".

4. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 Provide the height of all existing structures on the site plan.

5. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Per D.S. 3-05.2.1.3 When the side(s) of a parking space abuts any vertical barrier over six (6) inches in height, other than a vertical support for a carport, the required width for the space is ten (10) feet to provide extra width to allow passengers to enter and exit the vehicle on the side where the barrier exists. That said the proposed parallel vehicle parking spaces shown along the east property line and the vehicle parking space shown along the north side of the building do not meet this requirement.

6. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 The proposed accessible vehicle parking space is required to have an eight (8) foot wide access aisle.

7. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 Show the required bicycle parking on the plan. Keynote 14 does not appear on the plan. Provide the following info for the off-street bicycle parking; materials for lighting, paving, and security; fully dimensioned layout; location; specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports.

8. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 Detail C Sheet C-3 the "5' WIDE ACCESS AISLE" is not shown correctly, see D.S. 2-09 Figure 9.

9. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10 Show the existing and future sight visibility triangles on the site plan.

10. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11 Provide a width dimension for the entrance parking area access lane (PAAL).

11. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Per D.S. 2-08.4.1.B A sidewalk will be provided adjacent and parallel to any PAAL on the side where buildings are located & per D.S. 3-05.2.2.B.1 A minimum setback distance of five (5) feet for a pedestrian refuge area must be maintained between any enclosed structure and a PAAL. That said provide the required sidewalk and five (5) foot refuge along the east side of the building.

12. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Per D.S. 2-08.3.1 show the required pedestrian circulation to the refuse enclosure.

13. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Provide some type of barrier for all areas that vehicles maybe able to access unpaved areas of the site, see D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.1.

14. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 If applicable show the location, type, size, and height of existing and proposed signage on the plan.

15. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.14 Per LUC Section Sec. 3.4.5.3. the minimum size for a loading space for Automotive - Service and Repair Major is 12 X 35.

16. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.14 Show the maneuvering area for the loading space.

17. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.19 Show the future right-of-way (ROW) and dimension.

18. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 If applicable show all easements graphically on the plan along with the recordation information, docket and page, on the plan.

19. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25 If applicable show existing and proposed site lighting on the plan.

20. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28 Show the existing zoning for the parcels on the north side of Ajo and the south side of the alley.

21. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31 The proposed use shown under general note 2 needs to be a use as shown in the LUC. For this project the proposed use should be listed as "AUTOMOTIVE - SERVICE AND REPAIR - MAJOR, 30 SUBJECT TO SECTION 3.5.13.5".

22. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.2 The building square footage shown on sheet C-1 differs from the square footage shown within the building footprint shown on C-2, please clarify.

23. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 Provide a floor area ratio (FAR) calculation on the plan.

24. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.5 Provide a loading space calculation on the plan that includes the number required and provided.

25. Depending on how all comments are addressed additional comments may be forth coming.
If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956.

C:\planning\site\t10cm02634

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan.
09/29/2010 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC REVIEW Denied 1. The marked crossing is non-compliant. There is no transition, termination and detectable warning at a safe area such as a parking aisle as there is no parking aisle.
2. The accessible parking space is non-compliant as there is no accessible aisle as required by 2006 IBC, ICC (ANSI 117.1), Section 502.
a. A better location for the accessible parking space and aisle might be the one space directly in front of the Office/Storage building.
3. Extend the accessible route to the new concrete pad work area.
END OF REVIEW
10/04/2010 BEVERLEY HESTER ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Project: Site plan T10CM02634 (First Review)
643 W. Ajo Way
DATE: October 4, 2010
FROM: Beverley Hester, Engineering Division

Summary of Review
This review is from the Planning and Development Services Department's Engineering Division for the site plan only. A re-submittal is required. Please include a response letter to the comments detailed below in your next submittal.

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan

A. The Site Plan and Drainage Statement cannot be approved as submitted.
B. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the Site Plan.
C. Please include a Drainage Report with the next submittal.
D. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.
E. Depending on how all comments are addressed, additional comments may be forth coming.
F. An electrical permit will be needed.

Site Plan Comments from "City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-02.0 Site Plan Content and Specifications"
1. Provide all existing and proposed buildings and structures, including location, size, height, overhangs, canopies, and use (D.S. 2-02.2.1.6).
2. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles (D.S. 2-02.2.1.10).
3. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified (D.S. 2-02.2.1.12).
a. An access ramp will be needed on the sidewalk at the NE entrance.
b. An easement is needed for the sidewalk portion located on private property.
c. Provide documentation/approval from City of Tucson's Department of Transportation for the sidewalk configuration on the NE portion of the property.
4. Fully dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) (D.S. 2-02.2.1.14).
a. Provide the radii's of the alley/road on the south side for service vehicles accessing the dumpster. The minimum inside curb radii is 34' and the outside radii is 50'.
5. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities (D.S. 2-02.2.1.17).
6. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way (D.S. 2-02.2.1.19).
a. The future right of way width for Ajo Way is 120'.
b. Show the future curb location.
c. Show the intersection widening.
7. All easement of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page (D.S. 2-02.2.1.20).
8. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines (D.S. 2-02.2.1.21).
Drainage Report:
1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the Drainage Report.
2. A detention / retention basin is required for this project because the property is located within a balanced basin (Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, CHPT 3.3.)
3. A Drainage report is required for any site greater than one acre in size or for any site subject to detention requirements (Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, CHPT 2.1.1)
4. The content and format of the Drainage Report should follow Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, CHPT 2.2.
5. If applicable, add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and checklist per Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management. CHPT 2.3.1.6 C to the Drainage Report.

Other Engineering Comments
a. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information.
b. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting"
c. Describe the dashed rectangles in the concrete slab and the work areas.
d. Pedestrian access to the dumpster is needed.
e. Show scuppers and roof drainage. 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers and/or sidewalk scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof drain/sidewalk scupper locations have been designed and located and that the 10-year flow must be conveyed under any other sidewalks and/or pedestrian paths will suffice.
f. Show the minimum in width for dumpster approach of 40' straight back.
g. Dimension dumpster detail as re-lined.
h. "Thicken edge Detail A" on sheet C-2 does not match Detail "A" on sheet C-3.
i. Remove electrical components from the site plan. These should be on the building plan with an electric permit.
j. A grading plan may be required for this project.

Please contact me if you have any questions regarding the engineering comments for this project. I can be reached at 837-4935 or Bev.Hester@tucsonaz.gov.

Respectfully,

Beverley Hester

City of Tucson
Planning and Development Services Department
Engineering Division
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 837-4935 office
(520) 879-8010 fax
10/13/2010 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Revise the site drawing to include the following information:
a. the size of the water meter
b. the location of any fire hydrants
c. the size of the public sanitary sewer
d. the invert and rim elevation of the upstream and downstream manholes
Reference: City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-01.1.0 2 3.8 D and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
2. Verify the material used for the existing building sewer is listed for use under the proposed slab. Reference: Sections 313.4 and 701.1, UPC 2006.
3. Show the size and location of the backflow prevention assembly for the water service connection. Backflow prevention assemblies shall be located as close as practicable to the service connection and in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications and Tucson Water's standard installation details. Reference Chapter 27, Article V, Section 27-76 (a), Tucson Code. http://www.tucsonaz.gov/water/docs/backflow-ord.pdf
10/15/2010 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. On streets designated as Major Streets and Routes (MS&R), the street landscape border is measured from the MS&R right-of-way line as determined by LUC 2.8.3.4. Identify future Right of Way line

2. Street landscape borders shall be located entirely on site, except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee. Portions of the street landscape border are located outside the property line, obtain permission for use of Right of Way or place vegetation within site boundaries

3. Within a vehicular use area, one (1) canopy tree is required for each 4 motor vehicle parking spaces and every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.

4. When the side(s) of a parking space abuts any vertical barrier over six (6) inches in height, other than a vertical support for a carport, the required width for the space is ten (10) Per D.S. 3-05.2.1.3

5. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan.

6. Additional comments may apply
10/18/2010 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied Provide NPPO application for exception, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes photographs of the site taken from all sides of the property per DS 2-15.2.0.C.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
02/09/2011 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
02/09/2011 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed