Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T10CM02391
Parcel: 116193760

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW

Permit Number - T10CM02391
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/07/2010 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Approved
09/13/2010 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Provide subsoil drainage for the areas having floors below grade. Reference: Section 1101.5, UPC 2006.
09/13/2010 ERIC NEWCOMB HC REVIEW Passed
09/13/2010 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: QIP Foundation Only
T10CM02391
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 13, 2010

1. The foundation plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section and the plans appear to be approvable but due to the amount of comments by other PDSD agencies Zoning will not stamp and approve the plans at this time.

2. Once an approvable set of drawings is submitted Zoning will approve the plans.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956

C:\planning\grading\t10cm02391.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED:
09/13/2010 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: PROVIDE A KEY PLAN LOCATING SPECIFIC DESIGN ELEMENTS (WALLS, FRAMES, COLUMNS, AND FOOTINGS) IN RELATION TO THE GRID SYSTEM USED ON THE DRAWINGS.
2. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE MAT FOOTINGS AND THE INTERIOR STAIR AND ELEVATOR AREAS OF THE OFFICE BUILDING, FOOTING CALCULATIONS WERE NOT LOCATED FOR THE COLUMNS AND WALLS OF THE OFFICE BUILDING, ANNEX, AND GARAGE. VERIFY.
3. SHEET S100 (MASONRY VERTICAL REINFORCING SCHEDULE); CONCRETE BLOCK MASONRY GENERAL NOTE 10(E): THE VERTICAL REINFORCING DENOTED IN THE GENERAL NOTES DOES NOT AGREE WITH THE VERTICAL REINFORCING LISTED IN THE SCHEDULE. CLARIFY AND REVISE.
4. SHEET S101A; FOUNDATION PLAN: SHOULD A SUMP PIT BE PROVIDED AT THE ELEVATOR BETWEEN GRIDS K AND L? VERIFY.
5. SHEET S101B; FOUNDATION PLAN: COMPLETE THE SECTION CUT NEAR GRIDS 2 AND W.
6. SHEET S101B; FOUNDATION PLAN: IS THE GRID AT THE LEFT OF THIS PLAN 'W' (PER THE CALL OUT BELOW GRID 9) OR 'V' (PER THE CALL AT THE TOP OF THIS SHEET. VERIFY.
7. SHEET S101B; FOUNDATION PLAN: MOVE THE SECTION CUT 3/S202 NORTH OF GRID 'O' (ON GRID 2) TO CLEAR UP THE VERBIAGE.
8. SHEET S101B; FOUNDATION PLAN: IS THE SECTION CUT 3/S202 (ON GRID 2 SOUTH OF GRID S) PERTINENT TO THIS LOCATION? IT DIFFERS FROM SECTION 2/S201 (BLOCK EXTENDS TO THE TOP OF FOOTING AND THE SLAB STOPS AT THE WALL). CLARIFY.
9. SHEET S101B; FOUNDATION PLAN: ARE THE TWO SECTION CUTS 3/S202 (ON GRID S BETWEEN GRIDS 7 AND 8) PERTINENT TO THESE LOCATIONS? THEY DIFFER FROM SECTION 2/S201 (BLOCK EXTENDS TO THE TOP OF THE FOOTING AND THE SLAB STOPS AT THE WALL). CLARIFY.
10. SHEET S101B; FOUNDATION PLAN: ON GRID S BETWEEN GRIDS 8 AND 9, THERE IS A NOTE ABOUT STEPPING THE FOOTING. ADD A REFERENCE TO SECTION 5/S200 IN THAT NOTE. VERIFY.
11. SHEET S101B; FOUNDATION PLAN: THE SECTION CUT 15/S200 ON GRID 9 SHOULD BE MOVED SOUTH TO BE LOCATED AT THE 6'-0" WIDE FOOTING. VERIFY.
12. SHEET S101B; FOUNDATION PLAN: THERE ARE NOTES AT SEVERAL LOCATIONS ON THIS PLAN ABOUT STEPPING THE FOOTING. ADD A REFERENCE TO SECTION 5/S200 IN THOSE NOTES. VERIFY.
13. SHEET S101B (FOUNDATION PLAN); SHEET S202 (SECTION 3): SECTION 3 INDICATES A SOIL BEARING CAPACITY OF 3000 PSF, BUT THE SECTION IS CUT ON SHEET S101B (ANNEX FOUNDATION). THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT INDICATES AN ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING CAPACITY OF 2000 PSF. VERIFY.
14. SHEET S110; FOUNDATION PLAN: MOVE THE SECTION CUT 14/S200 WEST OF GRID 8.7 (ON GRID V) TO CLEAR UP THE VERBIAGE.
15. SHEET S200; SECTION 1: WHAT ARE THE 4" AND 12" DIMENSIONS UNDER THE SLAB? CLARIFY.
16. SHEET S200; SECTION 2: WHAT IS THE 4" DIMENSION UNDER THE SLAB? CLARIFY.
17. SHEET S200; SECTION 6: ONE NOTE INDICATES THE MAXIMUM WALL POUR LENGTH = 100'-0", WHILE A SECTION NOTE INDICATES A MAXIMUM SPACING = 25'-0". CLARIFY.
18. SHEET S200; SECTION 7A/7: THE ANGLE AT THE UPPER SLAB STATES: 'CONT. GALV. ANGLE 5" X 3 1/2" X 5/16" X 1'-0" LG? CLARIFY.
19. SHEET S201; SECTIONS 19 AND 20: MOVE THE 8" WALL DIMENSION TO CLEAR UP THE VERBIAGE.
20. SHEET S202; SECTION 1: WHAT IS THE 4" DIMENSION UNDER THE SLAB ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE SECTION? CLARIFY.
21. SHEET S202; SECTION 1: PROVIDE A DIMENSION FROM THE STEP IN THE SLAB TO THE POINT IN THE BOTTOM OF THE SLAB WHERE THE SLAB TURNS UP AT 45 DEGREES.
22. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
09/13/2010 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Passed
09/13/2010 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Passed
09/13/2010 BETH GRANT COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Approved
09/14/2010 ELIZABETH LEIBOLD ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Bldg plans can not be stamped approved by Engineering until base plan (D10-0023) is approved. - EL
09/15/2010 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Passed
09/24/2010 RICHARD JIROUDEK ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Plans denied for the following:

1. A concrete encased electrode is required per NEC 2005 250.50, 250.52.

2. Verify there will be no underground raceways installed under building foundation/slab.

Rich Jiroudek
Electric Plns Exmn

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
10/06/2010 DELMA ROBEY OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed