Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI
Permit Number - T10CM02281
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/19/2010 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/30/2010 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET ASP1: ALL LETTERING MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT PER CITY OF TUCSON STANDARDS. REVISE. 2. SHEET A103; DETAIL 4: ALL LETTERING MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT PER CITY OF TUCSON STANDARDS. REVISE. 3. SHEET A200; PARTITION TYPES: FOR WALLS THAT STOP 6" ABOVE THE CEILING, PROVIDE DETAILS AT THE TOP OF THE WALL TO INDICATE DIAGONAL BRACING TO RESIST HORIZONTAL LOADS AS REQUIRED BY THE 2006 IBC, SECTION 1607.13. PROVIDE BRACE SIZE, SPACING, CONNECTION TO THE TOP OF THE PARTITION WALL, AND CONNECTION TO THE EXISTING STRUCTURE ABOVE. 4. SHEET A301; SECTIONS 1, 2, AND 3: PROVIDE CONNECTION INFORMATION FOR THE METAL STUD FRAMING/BRACING (KEYED NOTES 25, 26, AND 27). 5. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 08/31/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/31/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Provide structural calculations to verify that the existing roof is capable of supporting the additional dead load due to the installation of the roof top unit. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006. |
| 08/31/2010 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/01/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide a direct waste connection for the wash and rinse sections of the 3-compartment sink, with an indirect connection for the sanitizing compartment only. Reference: Sections 304.0, 704.3, and 801.2.3, UPC 2006. 2. Provide upper terminal cleanouts on horizontal drainage pipes exceeding 5 feet in length (horizontal drain lines serving sinks require cleanouts regardless of length). Reference: Section 707.4, UPC 2006. 3. Provide cleanouts sized per Section 707.11, UPC 2006 (e.g. the existing 4" waste pipe is now being served by a 3" cleanout). 4. The waste riser diagram shows three fixtures (8, 14, and 17) with indirect waste connections to the floor sink at the cashwrap; should fixture 17 be fixture 13? |
| 09/17/2010 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/20/2010 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | needs waste water credit evaluation-5th floor 740-6602 needs IWC review/approval- Tom Tomchak, 443-6200- 5025 W Ina Rd need to clarify if mop sink is direct- per plumbing fixture chart or indirect per isometric & plumbing plan? |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/21/2010 | SUE REEVES | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/21/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |