Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T10CM02212
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/05/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/13/2010 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: T10CM02212 1025 E. Ajo Way Site Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: 10/13/10 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. DS 2-02.2.1.A.2 This property at present consists of two tax parcels. It appears that a lot split or reconfiguration is proposed. A lot split showing how the existing development will still meet code requirements is required to be submitted and approved by PDSD, prior to approval of this site plan. Ingess/egress easements, construction easements, pedestrian circulation easements and any utility easements can be completed with the lot split and then provide the recording docket and page information for the easements as well as the lot split case number on the site plan. 2. DS 2-02.2.1.A.12 An easement will be required to be placed over the adjoining property to the east for pedestrian circulation. Please add a note to the plans listing the type of document that provides the cross access, and pedestrian circulation. Add the recordation information (docket and page number) of the document. 3. DS 2-02.2.1.A.20 If applicable, provide all easements of record graphically on the plan together with recording docket and page information. Example: Is there an easement for the 10X10 TEP transformer? 4. DS 2-02.2.1.A.10 Provide the case number and date of approval for the DSMR in note #37. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\T10CM02212-2.doc |
| 10/13/2010 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: October 13, 2010 SUBJECT: Site/Grading Plan Review TO: LOCATION: 1025 E Ajo Way, T14S, R14E, Section 30, Ward 5 REVIEWERS: Bianca Ramirez, CFM ACTIVITY: T10CM02212/T10BU01278 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan, Grading Plan, Hydrology Report and SWPPP. SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed site plan for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan at this time. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Please provide a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the site plan. Site Plan/Grading Plan: 1. Complied 2. Complied 3. Complied 4. Proposed development appears to encompass both properties. Provide associated documentation for lot combination. Response: This comment will remain until proper documentation has been provided to address comments. 5. Complied 6. See zoning comments. 7. Complied 8. Complied 9. Complied 10. Per City of Tucson, Transportation Access Management Guidelines, Guideline 5.4.1 states entrance and exit drives crossing arterial and collectors are limited to two per three hundred feet of frontage along any major roadway. The nearest pavement edges spaced at least eighty feet apart. Guideline 5.4.1 states a minimum of one hundred and fifty feet, measured at curbline, shall separate the nearest pavement edge of any entrance or exit driveway and the curbline to any signalized intersection with arterial and collector roadways. Demonstrate that this requirement has been met by providing dimensions to the listed features for verification. For questions in regard to Transportation Management Guidelines please contact Jose Ortiz, Civil Engineer, for questions. Response: Email sent to Jose Ortiz to confirm approval of driveway. 11. Complied 12. Complied 13. Complied 14. Complied 15. Pedestrian access from Ajo Way is crossing both properties; provide reconfiguration or lot combination with next submittal OR Cross Access Agreement and Construction Easement. 16. Please provide location, type, size, and height of existing and proposed signage D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13. Response: Please provide the SVT's and sign locations and the same sheet to ensure that signs are outside the SVT limits. Be advised that any proposed future signs located in the ROW or future ROW may not exceed 30 inches in height. 17. Complied 18. Complied 19. Complied 20. Complied 21. Complied 22. Condition entered into Permits Plus. 23. Complied 24. Complied 25. Complied 26. Complied 27. Complied 28. Complied 29. General note: A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 30. Complied 31. Complied 32. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 3 sets of SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans. Any development with an area of disturbance on 1 acre or greater requires a floodplain use permit. Response: Proposed concrete washout area is shown outside of the parcel. Provide offsite construction easement labeled on grading plans OR other authorization documentation. Otherwise SWPP Plan must be revised to that washout area is located within property boundary. 33. Complied 34. Provide cross section showing location of storm pipe and other existing pipelines and any proposed cut, please note that it is not advisable to place basin over existing utility lines, especially since soils are subject to caving. Response: There is a parallel line that is shown on sheet C2.1 that in near keynote labels 5 and 9 and located at southeast corner of project. Please identify entity and explain it's purpose. 35. Complied 36. Complied 37.. 38. Complied 39. Complied 40. Complied 41. Please clarify entities on sheet three near southwest corner of project, see highlighted areas. 42. Complied 43. Show conformance to geotechnical recommendation for setback of 10' at 2 percent for proposed drainage swale located north of proposed building. Response: Geotechnical Report says "protective slopes should be provided with an outfall of 2 percent for 10 feet" the north swale will be require grouted rip rap, design revision or other solution must be provided that meets Geotechnical Report. 44. Additional comments may be forthcoming. Geotechnical Report - Approved Drainage Report - Approved If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4928 or Bianca.Ramirez@tucsonaz.gov Bianca C. Ramirez Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4928 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
| 10/19/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Please coordinate site design and changes with sheets SD1.1 and C3.1. 2. At the drive connection to future construction marked crossing, please delete the two detectable warnings on the sidewalk ramps at the North end and provide one detectable warning at the landings' edge in the direction of travel. END OF REVIEW |
| 10/21/2010 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | 1. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. 2. Ensure that all Engineering and Zoning comments and concerns are addressed prior NPP / Landscape approval stamp. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/04/2010 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |