Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T10CM02212
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/04/2010 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/05/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/06/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Comment not addressed; the envelope energy calculations on sheet A1.1 have not been corrected. Provide energy code compliance calculations using the correct climate zone (Pima County < 4,000 feet, not the town of Pima, Arizona). Revise the calculations to match the construction of the building (e.g. the walls and the roof). Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. |
| 10/06/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The branch piping for the urinal is called out as ¾" in detail 2/P1.2. [The branch piping size called out for the urinal flush valve will result in a water velocity greater than 8 FPS. Limit the water velocity to less than 8 FPS for the copper piping. Reference: Sections 610.12 and A 6.1, UPC 2006 and IS 3-2003, Section 2.6.] 2. Provide an appeal to the building official, justifying the use of fittings in an un-listed application, per Section 301.4, UPC 2006. Refer also to Section 311.6, UPC 2006. [The 2-way cleanout shown in Detail 6/P1.3 is in violation of Section 707.6, UPC 2006. Section 707.4 (4), UPC 2006 allows the use of an approved, 2-way cleanout fitting (note that "fitting" is singular) only as a substitute for an upper terminal cleanout.] |
| 10/13/2010 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 10/13/2010 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Terry Stevens Lead Planner Comments: 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 10/13/2010 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Unable to approve building plan until site and grading plan has been approved. |
| 10/19/2010 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Please include the new structural calculations in the structural calculation booklet. 2. Please have the structural engineer review the special inspections selected in the conditions column of this permit application and explain exactly what inspections are not required and why. END OF REPORT |
| 10/25/2010 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Project: T10CM02212 1025 E Ajo Way New Circle K Item #3 of previous review not corrected. In this Jurisdiction the service entrance conductors are customer installed, the conductor sizes are to be indicated on the plan. Cannot provide a note indicating " coordinate with TEP prior to installing", in order to comply. Ray T Majuta Elect Plan Ck PDSD, City of Tucson, 10/25/10, Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/26/2010 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied |