Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T10CM02212
Parcel: 13214078H

Address:
1025 E AJO WY

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T10CM02212
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/12/2010 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
08/12/2010 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Passed Not a COT owned or operated property
08/12/2010 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Terry Stevens
Lead Planner

PROJECT: T10CM02212
1025 E. Ajo Way
Site Plan

TRANSMITTAL DATE: 08/24/10

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. DS 2-02.2.1.A.2 This property at present consists of two tax parcels. It appears that a lot split or reconfiguration is proposed. A lot split showing how the existing development will still meet code requirements is required to be submitted and approved by PDSD, prior to approval of this site plan. Ingess/egress easements, construction easements, pedestrian circulation easements and any utility easements can be completed with the lot split and then provide the recording docket and page information for the easements as well as the lot split case number on the site plan.

2. DS 2-02.2.1.A.5 Provide the radius and length of the property line at the south west corner of the property.

3. DS 2-01.2.1.A.7 Provide the setback dimension form the north side of the proposed building to the north property line. (it appears a typo showing 0.00')

4. DS 2-02.2.1.A.9 Please provide a plan view detail of the proposed class 2 bicycle parking spaces. Single rack spaces placed in a row will allow a minimum of seventy -two (72) inch length per bicycle parking space and a minimum of thirty (30) inches between outer spaces of racks. A five (5) foot wide access aisle measured from the front or rear of the seventy-two (72) inch long parking space will be provided beside each row. Lighting will be provided such that all facilities are thoroughly illuminated and visible from adjacent sidewalks, parking lots, or buildings, during working hours.

Bicycle parking provided on the DP does not meet the requirements of revised DS (Development Standard) 2-09. Per DS 2-09.4.1 Class 2 bicycle parking facilities will be located no more than fifty (50) feet from the main building entrance. A DSMR can be applied for or relocate the class two bicycle parking spaces. If a DSMR is applied for provide on the site plan the case number, date of approval, what has been applied for, and any conditions of approval. Provide the DSMR case number near the lower right corner of each sheet.

5. DS 2-02.2.1.A.12 An easement will be required to be placed over the adjoining property to the east for pedestrian circulation.

Handicap ramps and truncated domes will be required to be provided at the cross walk near the south east corner of the property.

Please add a note to the plans listing the type of document that provides the cross access, and pedestrian circulation. Add the recordation information (docket and page number) of the document.

6. DS 2-02.2.1.A.20 If applicable, provide all easements of record graphically on the plan together with recording docket and page information. Example: Is there an easement for the 10X10 TEP transformer?

7. DS 2-02.2.1.A.10 Provide the location of the future sight visibility triangle for the south entrance. See engineering comments.
Note: The proposed sign location at the south entrance will not be allowed to be located within the future sight visibility triangle. This proposed sign if keep in the present location (in the existing right of way) would require a Temporary Revocable Easement to be obtained from the Real Estate Division of the City of Tucson.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961

C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\T10CM02212.doc
08/18/2010 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC REVIEW Denied 1. The marked crossing ramps at Park Av refer to COT SD 207 which is for public right of way only. This crossing is mostly in the private property boundaries and is goverened by the 2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC (ANSI 117.1), Sections 406 and 406.12 for detectable warnings. Please correct the accessible code reference and change the design to comply with the above mentioned accessible code as required.
a. Please provide a large scale detail of the ramps and crossing.
2. Please confirm the dimensional clearance from the top of the main entrance ramp to the face of the open doors. It appears to be 4'.
3. Please add curb ramps and detectable warnings at the marked crossing shown in the Ajo Way auto back up/turn around and comply with ICC (ANSI 117.1) Sections 406 and 406.12 for detectable warnings.

END OF REVIEW
08/26/2010 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Revise the site drawing to show the location and size of the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006 and Chapter 27, Article V, Section 27-76 (a), Tucson Code. http://www.tucsonaz.gov/water/docs/backflow-ord.pdf.
2. According to the site plan, the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (2476.90') is more than 12" below the first floor elevation (2482.64'). Fixtures located on floors that are greater than 12" above the rim elevation of the next upstream manhole shall not discharge through a backwater valve. Reference: Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
3. Sheet P1.1 of the building plans shows two 4" roof drain leaders discharging on the north side of the building with the keynote, "…terminate at storm drain. See civil drawings for continuation." Where is this storm drain shown on the civil plans?
08/31/2010 BIANCA RAMIREZ ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: August 31, 2010
SUBJECT: Site/Grading Plan Review
TO:
LOCATION: 1025 E Ajo Way, T14S, R14E, Section 30, Ward 5
REVIEWERS: Bianca Ramirez, CFM
ACTIVITY: T10CM02212 (First Review)


RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan, Grading Plan, Hydrology Report and SWPPP.

SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed site plan for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan at this time. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Please provide a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the site plan.

Site Plan/Grading Plan:

1. Please correct direction of address to "E" in project address accordingly throughout plan set and associated documents per D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.3.
2. Please revised location map per D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.4. Show the subject property approximately centered within the one (1) square mile area. Revise section corners to indicate accurate section for the area.
3. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.5. Show entire lot in plan view.
4. Proposed development appears to encompass both properties. Provide associated documentation for lot combination.
5. Provide all existing and proposed buildings and structures, including location, size, height, overhangs, canopies, and use per D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6. If building have been or are to be demolished, provide on site plan along with associated demolition permit number(s).
6. Please provide required zoning setbacks and distances between buildings dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7.
7. Provide fully dimensioned layout, location, parking spaces size and number, and typical parking space details for both handicapped and standard spaces, together with access thereto D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8.
8. Revise existing and future sight visibility triangles to depict appropriate triangle distances for stem of each triangle per D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10. Site visibility triangle (SVT) indicated in detail B2 - Sheet C5.1
9. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.11 & DS Sec.3-01.3.2.C: Depict and label 25-feet radii concrete curbs per City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Detail 213 (PC/COT SD 213) at the driveway entrance along Ajo Way and Park Ave. The curbs should be constructed at the edge of pavement and entirely on the subject property, which must also be depicted on the site plan.
10. Per City of Tucson, Transportation Access Management Guidelines, Guideline 5.4.1 states entrance and exit drives crossing arterial and collectors are limited to two per three hundred feet of frontage along any major roadway. The nearest pavement edges spaced at least eighty feet apart. Guideline 5.4.1 states a minimum of one hundred and fifty feet, measured at curbline, shall separate the nearest pavement edge of any entrance or exit driveway and the curbline to any signalized intersection with arterial and collector roadways. Demonstrate that this requirement has been met by providing dimensions to the listed features for verification. For questions in regard to Transportation Management Guidelines please contact Jose Ortiz, Civil Engineer, for questions.
11. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12.
12. Identify all sidewalks (existing/proposed) and verify that all sidewalks have been appropriate labels and dimensions throughout plans.
13. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to show the required 6-foot wide sidewalk with curb along the street frontage of Ajo Way and Park Ave. Revise dimensions on site plan to show the 6-foot width. Per the adopted Mayor and Counsel policy all sidewalks along MS&R right-of-ways for arterial and collector streets require 6-foot wide sidewalks.
14. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to show the required pedestrian circulation path that is required from the proposed buildings to the required pedestrian circulation path located along Ajo Way, pedestrian access crosses a backup spur. There will need to be a barrier between PAAL and pedestrian crossing.
15. Pedestrian access from Ajo Way is crossing both properties; provide reconfiguration or lot combination with next submittal OR Cross Access Agreement and Construction Easement.
16. Please provide location, type, size, and height of existing and proposed signage D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13.
17. Fully dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.14. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.14: Provide (label and dimension) the required onsite maneuvering area for the loading zone. Refer to AASHTO for the national standards for turning radii.
18. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Indicate proposed finished floor elevation(s).
19. DS Sec.2.02.2.1.A.16: Provide drainage arrows and locations of all concentration points. Specifically show roof down spout locations proposed buildings at pedestrian circulation areas. A detail for the dimension of the proposed scuppers that are used for collecting onsite roof drainage at all pedestrian sidewalk is required; refer to City of Tucson details. Any scuppers proposed under the sidewalk will be designed and constructed to convey the 10-year flood flow. Provide a drainage statement showing scupper calculations that demonstrate that the 10-year flood flow is contained under the sidewalk. Note that scuppers are not required was read; demonstrate this statement is true by providing roof drainage arrows as indicated above.
20. DS Sec. 2-05.2.4.H.2: Provide the right-of-way (ROW) recordation information for Ajo Way and Park Ave.
21. Label the 12-foot future sidewalk and curb area on the site plan to verify that all improvements are located outside of the future right-of-way.
22. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.20: Verify that site plan depicts and calls out all easements for existing and proposed utilities (water, gas, electric) and public/private sewer lines. Verify that all easement of record have been graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page reference per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20. Specifically, indicate location of Kinder Morgan or El Paso Gas line - owner needs to be verified.
23. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the Site Plan.
24. Provide local benchmark and benchmark description that notes where the benchmark is located and indication location on plans.
25. Show all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27.
26. Provide the associated plan activity number(s) on each sheet in the lower right hand corner.
27. Provide explanation for the alignment of the refuse container location per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0.
28. Refer to DS Sec.6-01.4.2 for specifications and requirements on access, placement of containers, bin enclosure and construction. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Label and show the maneuverability for refuse vehicles in plan view at the proposed refuse container location. Current positioning of trash area does not allow for 14' X 40' clear approach, show access dimensioning to proposed trash enclosure. Straightening out trash enclosure should address this problem.
29. General note: A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information.
30. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting".
31. All symbols on plans need to be indicated in legend. Indicate all symbols in legend.
32. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 3 sets of SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans. Any development with an area of disturbance on 1 acre or greater requires a floodplain use permit.
33. Remove note 24 on cover sheet, development of one acre or greater requires retention in a non designation basin
34. Provide cross section showing location of storm pipe and other existing pipelines and any proposed cut, please note that it is not advisable to place basin over existing utility lines, especially since soils are subject to caving.
35. Provide a geotechnical note on the grading plan regarding special inspection for excavations per geotechnical report, page 8.
36. Provide proposed basin data for both basins along with Q in and Q out, weir elevation, and Top/Bottom elevations of basins on plans.
37. Provide 100-yeat floodplain limits and 100-year ponding limits on plans.
38. Revise note 11 to reflect proper FEMA FIRM Panel Map Number.
39. Complete keynote 1, it appears that sentence was not completed.
40. Provide standard Handicap detail with $532 FINE indicated.
41. Please clarify entities on sheet three near southwest corner of project, see highlighted areas.
42. Call out radii(s) throughout project for all curb locations.
43. Show conformance to geotechnical recommendation for setback of 10' at 2 percent for proposed drainage swale located north of proposed building.
44. Additional comments may be forthcoming.



Geotechnical Report

1. Provide minimum setback for building from water surface ponding elevation.
2. Provide setback to TEP pedestal from proposed basin.
3. Additional comments may be forthcoming.


Drainage Report

1. Provide Floodplain limits, contained within Ajo Way on plan view.
2. In section 5.7 remove last sentence, since retention is required for all developments of one acre or greater in a non designated basin management area.
3. Provide discussion regarding the retention requirements, including the impervious changes from existing conditions to propose. It appears there may be a negligible amount of change(s) and therefore, a negligible amount of retention volume would be required. However, a statement may be provided requesting a waiver for retention constraints that include that the project is a fuels station and that there are many existing utility lines that need to be protected against infiltration.
4. Basins provided appear to provide a first flush function and provide compliance with new water harvesting requirements. Explain how these basins minimize fuel contamination to sub-surface soils.
5. Drainage report should provide infiltration rates based on geotechnical percolation testing, including drain down times for both basins.
6. Figure 4: Provide proposed basin data for both basins along with Q in and Q out, weir elevation, and Top/Bottom elevations of basins.
7. Per Hydraulic calculations the pavement n values of .016 cannot be accepted, please provide n value of .020, see Table 8.1, page 8.06 of City of Tucson Drainage Manual.
8. There is a circular keynote callout 7 on sheet two, please clarify or identify keynote.
9. Additional comments may be forthcoming.


If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4928 or Bianca.Ramirez@tucsonaz.gov

Bianca C. Ramirez
Engineering Associate
City of Tucson/Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 837-4928 office
(520) 879-8010 fax
09/08/2010 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved
09/08/2010 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. Within a vehicular use area, one (1) canopy tree is required for each four (4) motor vehicle parking spaces LUC 3.7.2.3 Additional trees are required.

2. Water Harvesting Infiltration Areas:

A. Plant Water Demand Category Column B should equal 100% revise and re-calculate as necessary

B. Note: Organic mulch is appropriate for reducing evaporation, controlling dust and increasing soil quality in Water Harvesting Infiltration Areas in those locations where the vegetation, water collection, erosion conditions, and slope characteristics are amenable to its use.

C. Indicate spot elevations for the bottoms of water harvesting structures, at spillways, and to define other grades as needed.

D. Show location where any sensors that control the irrigation system will be placed

3. Add the following notes to the Rainwater Harvesting Plan:

10-03.6.1 MAINTENANCE

MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS: All Passive and Active Water Harvesting System components, Water Harvesting Infiltration Areas, and other site improvements necessary for the water harvesting system to function properly, should be regularly inspected and maintained. The following maintenance requirements should be addressed on the Implementation Plan.

Passive Systems. In addition to requirements for all systems, to ensure proper functioning of Passive Water Harvesting Systems, periodically inspect and maintain Sub-watershed surfaces and infrastructure associated with the system such as French drains, spillways, scuppers and other elements. Repair and correct problems as needed.

" Monitoring of water use and related information at the site shall be the responsibility of the property owner.

" Monitoring is required to verify compliance with the approved Water Harvesting Implementation Plan.

" Monitoring data shall be compiled, along with other necessary information, into an annual report to be submitted to the City by January 30 of each year per DS 10-3.7.1.

4. Ensure that all Engineering comments and concerns are addressed.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
10/01/2010 GERARDO BONILLA OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
10/01/2010 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed