Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T10CM02205
Parcel: 99999999A

Address:
4320 N ORACLE RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW

Permit Number - T10CM02205
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/11/2010 RONALD BROWN ADA REVIEW Passed Not a COT owned or operated property
08/12/2010 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied Need new address recorded w/ PC addressing & change to reflect address change
need to show location/method of connection
08/12/2010 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
08/17/2010 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. SHEET A1; SITE PLAN/FLATWORK KEYNOTES: THE ACCESSIBILITY CODE FOR THIS PROJECT IS THE ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 AND THE 2006 IBC. REPLACE THE ADAAG REFERENCE IN NOTE 10.
2. SHEET A2; FLOOR PLAN: ENLARGE THE LETTERING TO A MINIMUM HEIGHT OF 3/32" FOR THE DIMENSIONS AND DETAIL CUTS AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF TUCSON STANDARDS.
3. SHEET A2; DETAIL 8: IS THE TITLE 'RAILING DETAIL' CORRECT? VERIFY.
4. SHEET A2; FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES: DID NOT LOCATE NOTES 8, 10, 19, 26, AND 27 ON THE FLOOR PLAN. VERIFY.
5. SHEET A2; FLOOR PLAN: THE DETAIL CUT REFERENCED 3/A1 ON THE EAST WALL IS INCORRECT. VERIFY.
6. SHEET A3; ELEVATION KEYNOTES: DID NOT LOCATE NOTE 16 ON THE ELEVATIONS. VERIFY.
7. SHEET A3; NORTH ELEVATION: THE DETAIL CUT REFERENCED 4/A2 IS INCORRECT. VERIFY.
8. SHEET A3; EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS: THE DETAIL CUT REFERENCED 12/A4 IS INCORRECT. VERIFY.
9. SHEET A3; EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS: ENLARGE THE LETTERING TO A MINIMUM HEIGHT OF 3/32" FOR THE SECTION CUT 1/A5 AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF TUCSON STANDARDS.
10. SHEET A4; DETAILS 5 AND 11: ENLARGE THE LETTERING TO A MINIMUM HEIGHT OF 3/32" AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF TUCSON STANDARDS.
11. SHEET A4; ROOF PLAN: THE DETAIL CUT REFERENCED 12/A4 ON THE WEST WALL IS INCORRECT. VERIFY.
12. SHEET A4 (ROOF PLAN); ROOF KEYNOTES (NOTE 2): THE KEYNOTES INDICATE THIS NOTE WAS NOT USED, BUT IT APPEARS TWICE ON THE ROOF PLAN. VERIFY.
13. SHEET A5; SECTION 3: THE DETAIL REFERENCED 7/A5 IS INCORRECT. VERIFY.
14. SHEET A5; SECTION 3: THE DETAIL REFERENCED 8/A2 IS INCORRECT. VERIFY.
15. SHEET S100; FOUNDATIONS: NOTES 1, 2, AND 3 INDICATE A SOILS INVESTIGATION WAS PERFORMED. SUBMIT THAT REPORT FOR REVIEW.
16. SHEET S100 (DESIGN LOADS); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 2): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY C, WHILE THE DRAWINGS INDICATE CATEGORY B. CLARIFY.
17. SHEET S400; DETAIL 408: THE PLAN VIEW INDICATES TO SEE THE PLAN FOR THE PIER DIMENSIONS. BE MORE SPECIFIC AS THESE DIMENSIONS ARE ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN, BUT NOT ON THE STRUCTURAL PLAN.
18. GENERAL; DEFERRED SUBMITTAL NOTE: ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY LEERAY HANLY BEFORE THOSE SUBMITTALS WILL BE REVIEWED.
19. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
08/18/2010 ERIC NEWCOMB HC REVIEW Denied 1. SEE BUILDING COMMENTS.
08/18/2010 BETH GRANT COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Passed
08/20/2010 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: 4328 N. Oracle Road
T10CM02205
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 20, 2010

1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved development package. Please submit two copies of the approved and development package with the next building plan submittal.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956

C:\planning\grading\t10cm02205.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED:
08/20/2010 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Project: T10CM02205
4328 N Oracle Rd
New Shell Bldg

Electrical Plans denied on following Items:

1. Sheet E1--Fault Current Calculations use 208 volt 3 phase to calculate, the plan showsa 277/480 volt service.
2. Sheet E1 enlarged detail of sevice shows the service enclosed in equipment room. The area does not appear to allow the required clearance per 2005 NEC 110-26. Please address this situation.
3. Provide information on this project, is the only work to relocate the TEP transformer and feed a new 800 amp SES. New work also appears to relocate a light pole. The existing lighting to remain,
4. Sheet E6, the 100 amp service feeding Panel OWH and OW are shown near shell building #12, is this equipment also being relocated next to the new 800 amp service ?

Ray T Majuta
Elect Pln CK
PDSD City of Tuc
8/23/10
08/20/2010 ELIZABETH LEIBOLD ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Engineering will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. - EL
08/24/2010 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide the site plan referenced on sheet P1.1. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
2. Clarify the note calling for the connection of the sump pump discharge to a 3" outlet and the note calling for a 2" discharge pipe, apparently downstream of the 3" outlet. Reference: Section 310.4, UPC 2006.
3. Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
08/24/2010 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Passed
08/24/2010 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
08/24/2010 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
08/24/2010 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed