Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T10CM01987
Parcel: 12112060B

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL

Permit Number - T10CM01987
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/25/2010 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Window Depot
T10CM01987
Site Plan (2nd Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 25, 2010

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance.

2. It appears this site is comprised of three (3) separate parcels and requires a lot combination. Prior to approval of this site plan provide a copy of the approved Pima County Combination Request Form, and a copy of the recorded Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property along with the recordation information, docket and page.

3. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 As an additional planter has been added near the handicapped vehicle parking spaces provide a dimension from the southwest corner of the planter to the pop out on the building. This dimension should not be less than 4'-0".

4. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 A pedestrian access easement is required for the sidewalk shown along Speedway. Zoning acknowledges that this comment should have been provided on the first review.

5. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 All easements shown "TO BE ABANDONED BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT" need to be abandoned prior to approval of the site plan. Provide a copy of the recorded document used to abandon the easements.

6. Provide written documentation from solid waste approving the proposed location. If the refuse location is to remain in the ROW contact Jim Rossie, COT Real Estate, @837-6718 or email at Jim.Rossi@tucsonaz.gov in regards to a temporary revocable easement (TRE). D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.32 It appears that the proposed location shown for the refuse container is within the right-of-way. Relocate the refuse container so that it is on site. For your information there has been a revision to the LUC Supplement No. 51 which states, LUC Section 3.4.4.1.C Loading zones may be co-located within the approach area for dumpster containers…
7. Depending on how the above comments are addressed addition comments may be forth coming.
If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956.

C:\planning\site\t10cm01467

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan.
08/26/2010 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC REVIEW Denied 1. For an accessible dumpster, please provide an accessible route between the two ramps. Provide all required marked crossings, median cuts with detectable warnings and slopes as per 2006 IBC, Chapter 11, Section 104 and ICC (ANSI 117.1), Sections 106, 402, 405, 406 with attension to 406.12 and 406.14.
END OF REVIEW
08/27/2010 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. The grading, site and landscape plans must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the plans. Ensure that all changes are reflected on the landscape plan.

2. Show the required setback from WH-1, south of the proposed building. The setback according to recommendations of the geotechnical report is 10 ft. Revise locations of plant material within water harvesting area.
08/30/2010 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved Exception
09/08/2010 LAITH ALSHAMI ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 09/08/2010,

Drainage Report:

1. Is the proposed 10' building setback from waterharvesting recommended by the geotechnical engineer? Provide a revised Geotechnical Report that addresses building setback from ponding water and revise the drainage report accordingly. Additionally, it appears that bicycle parking racks are proposed within the waterharvesting area south of the proposed building. Will the racks interfere with the basin?
2. The roof drainage directions shown on the drainage exhibit appear to be different from the direction shown on the Site/Grading plan. Provide consistent information on both documents.
3. Show, on the drainage exhibit, the proposed spot elevations/contour lines including within all waterharvesting basins.
4. Clarify if the site is impacted by drainage from the parcel to the west.
5. Show on the drainage exhibit all proposed drainage solutions/structures with all required details (i.e. type, materials, location, size and dimensions, slopes, grades, scuppers, high and low points, water ponding and slope setback lines, cross section locations and details, etc.) that would clarify how the proposed drainage scheme will work. The drainage information shown on the development plan and grading plan will be based on the information provided in the drainage report text and drainage exhibits.
6. The CD that was attached to the submittal was broken. Resubmit another copy.

Site/Grading Plan:

1. Provide the recordation documents that verify the abandonment of the all easements proposed to be abandoned.
2. Provide documentation which verifies that lot combination has been processed and completed.
3. Show the existing contours west of the proposed building to verify that offsite drainage will not impact the subject project from the west.
4. Provide written verification from COT Environmental Services that garbage collection can be in the alley without the need for onsite trash enclosure.
5. Provide any required sidewalk scuppers that might be needed to convey roof drainage underneath the concrete walkway next to the building.
6. Show the required setback from the waterharvesting basin, south of the proposed building. The setback shall be in accordance with the recommendation of the geotechnical report.
7. Add the following general grading note:

" CALL FOR PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETINGS. FOR A DSD ENGINEERING INSPECTIONS, CALL IVR (740-6970), OR SCHEDULE WITH A CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE AT THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, OR CONTACT DSD ENGINEERING AT 791-5550 EXTENSION 2101, OR SCHEDULE INSPECTIONS ONLINE AT: http://WWW.CI.TUCSON.AZ.US/DSD/ONLINE_SERVICES/ONLINE_PERMITS/ONLINE_PERMITS.HTML.

8. Revise the Site/Grading Plan in accordance with the drainage report revisions.

Landscape Plan:

The Landscape Plan is acceptable pertaining to Engineering and Floodplain Review.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
09/22/2010 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed