Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI
Permit Number - T10CM01649
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/18/2010 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/25/2010 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET A1.1; ARCHITECTURAL FLOOR PLAN: PER THE IBC SECTION 2902.4, THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO PUBLIC FACILITIES SHALL NOT PASS THROUGH KITCHENS OR SIMILAR SPACES. CREATE AN AISLE TO THE RESTROOM THAT DOES NOT PASS THROUGH THE PREP AREA. 2. SHEET A-4; ELEVATION E: LOCATE THE PAPER DISPENSER PER THE ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 , FIGURE 604.7. 3. SHEET A-4; ELEVATION E: LOCATE THE VERTICAL GRAB BAR PER THE ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003, FIGURE 604.7. 4. SHEET A6.1; FINISH SCHEDULE: A MINIMUM OF 3/32" HEIGHT FOR UPPER AND LOWER CASE LETTERING IS REQUIRED. 5. SHEET A-7; STUD SCHEDULE: NOTE (2) INDICATES A DETAIL 11/A-10. REVISE. 6. SHEET A-8; DETAIL 7: PROVIDE THE SIZE OF THE UNISTRUT BETWEEN THE EXISTING STEEL JOISTS AND THE CONNECTION OF THE UNISTRUT TO THE JOISTS. 7. SHEET A-8; DETAIL 7: THE NOTE FOR THE 3 5/8", 20 GAUGE STUDS INDICATES IT IS CONNECTED TO BLOCKING ABOVE. PROVIDE THE SIZE OF THE BLOCKING AND HOW IT IS CONNECTED TO THE EXISTING STEEL JOISTS. 8. SHEET A-8; DETAIL 7: THE THREADED ROD INDICATES TO BOLT IT TO 2X BLOCKING AT THE STRUCTURE ABOVE. IS THIS UNISTRUT OR 2X BLOCKING? CLARIFY. 9. SHEET M-2; ROOF TOP UNIT SCHEDULE: 2 ROOF TOP UNITS ARE INDICATED IN THE SCHEDULE. DO THESE REPLACE OLD UNITS? IF SO, WHAT ARE THE WEIGHT COMPARISONS? IF NEW, CAN THE EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE SUPPORT THE NEW LOADS? PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED. 10. SHEET M-3; ELEVATION 2: NOTE 20 INDICATES THE ROD HANGERS TO SUPPORT THE NEW HOOD. PROVIDE ROD SIZES AND HOW THOSE RODS ARE SUPPORTED AT THE ROOF. PROVIDE HOOD SUPPORT MEMBER SIZES AT THE ROOF AND HOW THOSE MEMBERS ARE CONNECTED TO THE EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE. 11. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 06/28/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/28/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Confirm the maximum gas input for the specified water meter; the manufacturer's literature indicates an input of 237,000 BTUH, not 190,000 BTUH. Reference: Sections 103.2.3 and 1216.2, UPC 2006. 2. Provide the size and terminations for the flue gas condensate and the pressure relief piping for the water heater. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 3. Confirm that the specified floor drains (Zurn ZN415) are listed for use in the United States. Reference: Section 301.1.1, UPC 2006. 4. Confirm the design basis for the grease waste system (i.e. which fixtures are required to be connected to the grease interceptor) with Doug Kirkland, Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (520-443-6200). If only the 3-compartment sink and the floor sink for the sanitizing compartment are required to be connected to the grease waste system, see Section 1014.2, UPC 2006 for the minimum design requirements. 5. Provide upper terminal cleanouts on horizontal drainage pipes exceeding 5 feet in length (horizontal drain lines serving sinks require cleanouts regardless of length). Reference: Section 707.4, UPC 2006. 6. Provide additional cleanouts in drainage pipe for each aggregate horizontal change of direction exceeding 135 degrees. Reference: Section 707.5, UPC 2006. 7. Provide a vent for floor drain (FD-1) located in the backroom (it is called out as a floor cleanout in the sanitary waste plan on sheet P-1). Reference: Sections 901.0 and 910.1, UPC 2006. 8. Coordinate the information shown on the sanitary waste plan (P-1) and the sanitary waste isometric (A/P-3). Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 06/28/2010 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SEE BUILDING COMMENTS. |
| 06/28/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The rooftop unit schedule on sheet M-2 calls out RTU-2 as being new but keynote 4 on sheet M-1 calls it "existing"; which version is correct? Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006. 2. Show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drain for RTU-2. Reference: Section 307.2, IMC 2006 and Section 814.0, UPC 2006. 3. Revise the sequence of operation for the restroom exhaust fans so that all of the air supplied to the restrooms will be exhausted (i.e. supply air is to be exhausted even if the restroom lights are off). Reference: Section 403.2.1 (4), IMC 2006. 4. Revise the size of the grease duct for the hood to provide a minimum velocity of 1500 feet per minute. Reference: Section 506.3.4, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 5. Provide an enclosing shaft for the grease duct or provide a duct wrap system in accordance with ASTM E 2336. Reference: Section 506.3.10, IMC 2006. 6. Provide information to show that the operation of the hood and the hood exhaust fan complies with Section 507.2.1.1, IMC 2006. 7. Provide a Type I hood, complete with an approved fire suppression system, over the conveyor-type pizza oven. Reference: Sections 507.1 and 507.2, IMC 2006. 8. Provide structural calculations and details to show that the Type I hood is supported from the building structure in accordance with Section 507.6, IMC 2006. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006. 9. Provide information to show that the make up air for the kitchen hood complies with Section 508.1.1, IMC 2006. |
| 07/13/2010 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | waste plumbing calc p-2 doesn't match floor plan p-1 or isometrics p-2 (floor sinks)(floor drain) needs WW credit evaluation 5th floor - 740-6544 need waste water capcity evaluation 3rd floor- kurt stemm - 740-6607 |
| 07/16/2010 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Project: 9136 E Valencia, Little Ceasars, T10CM01649 The Electrical Plans have been denied for the following: 1. Panel LPB does not show the size of the main breaker for Panel LPA. 2. Ex-fans in Equipment Schedules show 120/3 phase for #1 and #2. These should be 120/ 1 phase for #1, and 208/1 phase for #2. Also Mechanical Plan shows each fan at 115/1 phase ? 3. Submittal Requirements for the City of Tucson require a one-line of main service this service being tied to shown on plan , also provide the load in amperage for the Main Service along with new load this space. Ray T Majuta, Elect Pln Ck, PDSD, City of Tucson, 7/18/10 Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/26/2010 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/26/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |