Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI
Permit Number - T10CM01518
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/07/2010 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/11/2010 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET A0.1; CORRIDOR EGRESS WIDTH: REVISE THE REFERENCE TO IBC SECTION 1004.3.2.2 FOR THE MINIMUM EGRESS CORRIDOR WIDTH. 2. SHEET A0.1; EXITS: REVISE THE REFERENCE TO IBC SECTIONS 1014 AND 1018 FOR THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF EXITS. 3. SHEET A0.1; EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE: REVISE THE REFERENCE TO IBC SECTIONS 1015.1 AND 1018.2 FOR THE MAXIMUM EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE. 4. SHEET A0.1; CORRIDOR FIRE RESISTANCE: REVISE THE REFERENCE TO IBC TABLE 1016.1 FOR THE CORRIDOR FIRE RESISTANCE RATING. 5. SHEET A0.1; DEAD END CORRIDORS: REVISE THE REFERENCE TO IBC SECTION 1016.3 FOR THE MAXIMUM LENGTH OF A DEAD END CORRIDOR. 6. SHEET A0.1; SEISMIC DESIGN: REVISE THE REFERENCE TO IBC SECTION 1621 AND ASCE 7-02 FOR THE SEISMIC DESIGN REQUIREMENTS. WHY IS THIS REFERENCE MADE ON THIS PROJECT? 7. SHEET A0.1; PROJECT DATA AND CODE CHECK: UNDER THE REQUIRED PLUMBING FIXTURES, REVISE THE NUMBER OF WATER CLOSETS (MALE AND FEMALE), URINALS, LAVATORIES, DRINKING FOUNTAINS, AND SERVICE SINKS TO MATCH THIS TENANT SPACE ONLY. 8. SHEET A2.1; DIMENSION PLAN: PER SECTION 2902.2 OF THE IBC, SEPARATE FACILITIES SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EACH SEX. ONLY ONE RESTROOM IS PROVIDED. CLARIFY. 9. SHEET A2.1; DIMENSION PLAN: IF THE OPTIONAL AWNING IS APPROVED FOR THIS PROJECT, PROVIDE DETAILS ON FULL SIZE DRAWINGS AND STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS OF THE AWNING SUPPORT AND CONNECTIONS. 10. SHEET A2.2; DRINKING FOUNTAIN: THE DRINKING FOUNTAIN DETAIL IS NOT PERTINENT TO THIS PROJECT. REMOVE. 11. SHEET A7.1; DETAIL 4(B): PROVIDE THE SIZE AND SPACING OF THE HORIZONTAL BRACE, AND A DETAIL ON A FULL SIZE DRAWING OF HOW IT IS CONNECTED TO THE STRUCTURE. 12. SHEET A7.1; DETAIL 6: PROVIDE DETAILS ON A FULL SIZE DRAWING OF HOW THE METAL STUD BRACING IS CONNECTED TO THE TOP OF THE WALL AND TO THE STRUCTURE. 13. SHEET P2; DETAIL 1: PROVIDE A DETAIL ON THIS SHEET AS TO HOW THE WOOD BLOCKING IS CONNECTED TO THE EXISTING WALL AND THE SPACING OF THE 2X2X1/8 ANGLE FRAMES. 14. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 06/14/2010 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | |
| 06/14/2010 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SEE BUILDING COMMENTS. |
| 06/22/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/22/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide a vent for floor sink P-3 located in the bar area. An air admittance valve is acceptable but the underground vent shown in the riser diagram is unacceptable because the vent opening is below the weir of the trap (see section 905.5, UPC 2006). Reference: Section 901.0, UPC 2006. 2. Clarify the location of the mounting shelf for the water heater: it appears to be located along a storefront wall. Reference Sections 103.2.3 and 509.4, UPC 2006 3. Provide structural calculations for the mounting shelf for the water heater to show that the water heater is safely supported. Reference: Sections 310.0 and 314.5, UPC 2006. |
| 06/22/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/23/2010 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | 1.needs flow capacity evaluated by Kurt Stemm- 740-6607 2.need interceptor size & location onplans 3.need to show method/location of cennection on site plan 4.fuel at fit |
| 06/25/2010 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Project: T10CM01518 2404 E River Rd, TI Electriccal plans denied for following: 1. Fixture E type shows 277v, Fixture X shows 120v, both on same circuit. 2. Cannot locate D Fixtures. 3.Fixture H description on Fixture Schedule different than description on lighting plan. 4. Panel FF should be rated 200 amp on sheet E-3. 5. Circuit 29 Pnl FK marked spare on panel, used in power plan as receptacle. 6. New transformer on Sheet E3 listed as 45 KVA, shown as 30KVA on sheet E1. Ray T Majuta, PDSD, City of Tucson, Elect Pln Ck, 6/25/10 Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/28/2010 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/28/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |