Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T10CM01281
Parcel: 11706187D

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL

Permit Number - T10CM01281
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
07/08/2010 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Denied Fire Comments:

Sheet a1.0
Three exits are required. See IFC 1019.

Sheet a1.1
An alarm is required, codes should be 2006 IFC for Tucson, not Phoenix.
Sheet 1.1
Several references in fire protection plans to City of Scottsdale. Please correct.
Sheet a5.1
All exits from seating areas are required to be panic. See IFC 1008. Door 117b 3'0" by 3'0"? is an exit and requires panic hardware. Door 104a is an exit not storage and requires panic hardware.
07/13/2010 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: ANcongress
T10CM01281
Building Plan (2nd Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 13, 2010

1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning can not approve the building plan until the site plan has been approved see T10CM00463.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956

C:\planning\grading\t10cm01281.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED:
07/15/2010 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. OK
2. OK

3. On Sheet A1.0, Project Data, delete all reference to "ADAAG" and substitute "2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC (ANSI 117.1) 2003 Edition" for all references to accessibility code requirements.
RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS
a. On sheet A1.0, Project Data Suimmary, please delete the reference to the 1991 American with Disabilities Act Accessible Guidelines. We can accommodate an ADAAG review if so desired. Please fill out an Appeal to the Building Offical requesting an ADAAG review as opposed to the 2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC code review. There is a $120.00 filing fee for the appeal. Please submit to Mr. LeeRay Hanly.

4. OK
5. OK
HOWEVER
RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS
a. After reviewing your new modified plan associated with exiting I've found several descrapancies in your occupancy load calculations.
b. Your total occupancy load shown on the code data summary of 535.9 does not match the total number of 398 occupants exiting on sheet A1.1. There is also a problem with the total number exiting the two patio gates and the total number entering the patio. Please clarify.

6. OK
7. OK
8. Please provide structural calculations for the water heaters located on the mezzaine level.
RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS
a. If the structural engineer says we need them now, then let's provide them now for review.

9. For all the handrails and gardrails shown on the stair elevations and sections, insure that they are in compliance with The 2006 IBC, Section 1012, 1013 and ICC (ANSI 117.1) Section 505 and redraw as required to show compliance. Please provide all required critical dimensions.
RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS
a. I see no handrails for the steps up to the elevator level and the main South entrance.

10. OK (But it's not to scale)
11. OK
12. OK
13. OK
14. OK
15. OK
16. OK
17. OK

END OF REVIEW
07/19/2010 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide a drain outlet and grease reservoir for each of the proposed Type I hood exhaust fans. Reference: Section 506.5.2, IMC 2006.
2. Coordinate the structural drawings (i.e. roof framing) with the rooftop equipment proposed on the mechanical and the food service drawings; five condensing units, an A/C unit, a heat pump, and four exhaust fans are not included on the structural drawings. Provide structural calculations to verify that the existing roof is capable of supporting the additional dead load due to the installation of the roof top units. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006..
3. Comment not resolved. The structural sketch is not included in the drawing set and it allows for a maximum of 500 pounds. Section 507.6 requires the hood support to include not just the weight of the hood but also the weight of an employee cleaning the hood. Provide structural calculations and details to show that the Type I hoods (and the Type II hood) are supported from the building structure in accordance with Section 507.6, IMC 2006. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006.
4. The State of Arizona enforces ASME A17.1, Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators. Verify that the specified 15 GPM for the elevator sump pump discharge will be acceptable. Coordinate SP-1 and the size of its sump with the discharge rate of SP-2.
07/19/2010 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
07/20/2010 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Clarify how the gas connections to the appliances described in detail 4/P-2.1 are to comply with the requirements of Sections 409.1.2, 409.1.3, and 411.1.3.3, IFGC 2006.
07/23/2010 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied NEED CREDIT EVALUATION
07/27/2010 LEERAY HANLY ZONING HC REVIEW Passed SEE BUILDING FOLDER
08/03/2010 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
08/05/2010 SUE REEVES OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed