Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T10CM01281
Parcel: 11706187D

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI

Permit Number - T10CM01281
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/11/2010 SREEVES1 ADA REVIEW Passed
05/11/2010 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Denied Fire Comments:

Sheet a1.0
Three exits are required. See IFC 1019.

Sheet a1.1
An alarm is required, codes should be 2006 IFC for Tucson, not Phoenix.

The following information is required on the architectural or enginnering sheets: Please include the following fire sprinkler design criteria to the plans.
1. Flow data (static pressure, residual pressure, GPM)
Available from the Fire Department (520) 837-7029 or 837-7030.
2. The hazard classification of the building, including any special hazards.
3. The density required of the water supply.


Sheet a5.1
All exits from seating areas are required to be panic. See IFC 1008. Door 117b 3'0" by 3'0"? is an exit and requires panic hardware. Door 104a is an exit not storage and requires panic hardware.
05/17/2010 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied NEED TO IDENTIFY SIZE OF NEW CONNECTION TO EXSISTING 8" PUBLIC SEWER.
NEED WASTEWATER 5TH FLOOR CREDIT EVALUATION FOR EXSISTING PLUMBING FIXTURES REMOVED PER DRAWINGS & PREVIOUS PERMITS.
05/19/2010 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. The requirements for a minimum font size is 3/32" both upper and lower case. Please revise the following sheets to this standard and resubmit:
A1.0, A1.1, SP1, SP2, K1.0 through K 2.1.
2. Please provide a letter od deferred submittal summaries to Mr. LeeRay Hanly. Additional fees are accessed for deferred submittals.
3. On Sheet A1.0, Project Data, delete all reference to "ADAAG" and substitute "2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC (ANSI 117.1) 2003 Edition" for all references to accessibility code requirements.
4. The "Yogurt Store" has it's own address and is a separate project from "Ancongress". Please submit for a separate permit for the Yogurt Store.
5. Exiting for the occupants of the total restaurant (including both ground level and roof patios) is through one enclosed area encompassed of the building and the patio fencing. Therefore a total of 529.9 people are exiting and as per table1019.1, three exits are required.
a. Please change the General Building Summary for Building 278 from 2 required exists to 3 required exits.
b. Please ensure that all required exit doors and gates have panic hardware.
c. Please insure that all required exit doors and gates have exit signs.
d. Please coordinate and up date the Electrical Floor Plan Sheet E2.0 to be the same as Architectural Floor lan Sheets A1.1 and A3.0.
6. At the Fire Ordinance Requirements shown on Sheet A1.1, please cahge note 4 to Read "the City of Tucson" in lieu of "the City of Phoenix".
7. Please provide structural calculations for all roof mounted HVAC equipment.
8. Please provide structural calculations for the water heaters located on the mezzaine level.
9. For all the handrails and gardrails shown on the stair elevations and sections, insure that they are in compliance with The 2006 IBC, Section 1012, 1013 and ICC (ANSI 117.1) Section 505 and redraw as required to show compliance. Please provide all required critical dimensions.
10. For all the lavatory details shown on sheet A8.2 the required knee height clearance (as per Section 306.3) of 27" minimum and knee depth of 8" is not available. Please redesign and resubmit.
11. For all the toilet elevations and plans, please provide all critical vertical and horizontal dimensions.
12. The graphic symbols for a waterless urinal will in no way meet accessible standards. Please insure that the actual unit to be used complies with ICC (ANSI 117.1), Section 605.
13. The lavatory hardware again is deplictive of a hardware set that does not comply with accessible standards. Please insure that the actual unit to be used is accessible.
14. At detail 19/A8.2, The vertical in non compliant as per Section 604.5.1. Please revise to proper length and provide all required accessible dimensions on the detail.
15. At sheet A8.3, for all gardrails around the roof patio, please comply with IBC 2006, Section 1013. Please provide proper dimensions to show compliance.
16. Details are missing at sheet nos. A8.4 and A8.5.
17. At Sheet A3.0:
a. Please insure that all dining areas and patios comply with 1108.2.8, total floor area accessibility.
b. Please show accessible seating in the dining room, the dining room bar, the first level and roof top patio seating and the roof top bar equal to 5% of the provided seating as per Section1108.2.8.1.

END OF REVIEW
05/20/2010 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC REVIEW Denied Reference Building - Commerical for comments
05/20/2010 BETH GRANT COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Passed
05/21/2010 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide a complete plumbing plan, including water, waste and vent isometrics. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
2. Clarify the installation of the five proposed water heaters. Neither the mezzanine plumbing plan nor detail 8/p2.1 appears to resemble the specified water heaters. The installation shall conform to the manufacturer's installation instructions. Reference: Section 501.0, UPC 2006.
3. Show how the termination points of the water heater flues comply with Section 510.6.2, UPC 2006 (i.e. at least 2 feet above any point on the roof within 10 feet of the flue).
4. Each piece of equipment requiring backflow protection shall be independently protected. Reference: Sections 602.2 and 603.0, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
5. Appliances (e.g. ovens, ice makers, etc) to be directly connected to the water supply system that do not have listed, integral backflow preventers or integral air gaps conforming to Table 6-3, UPC 2006 require backflow prevention. Specify the type of backflow prevention device required for each water connection. Reference: Sections 602.3, 603.0, and Table 6-2, UPC 2006.
6. Show size, route and termination of T&P relief piping. Reference: Section 608.5, UPC 2006.
7. Revise the water pressure calculations to include the static lift to the highest water outlet and the pressure drop due to the water softener. Reference: Sections 608.1, 610.1 and 610.2, UPC 2006.
8. Provide a floor drain adjacent to the 3-compartment sink per Section 704.3, UPC 2006.
9. Confirm the size of the proposed grease interceptor per Section 1014.3.6, UPC 2006, using only the fixtures that are being plumbed to the gravity grease interceptor.
10. Correct the size of the gas pipe serving PH-10, PH-11, and PH-12 noted on sheet p1.1 from 2/4" (sic) to ¾".
11. Correct the size of the gas pipe serving each of five water heaters noted on sheet p1.2 from ¾" to 1". Also correct the drawing on sheet p1.2 to show five water heaters instead of two water heaters.
12. Provide the gas riser diagram referenced in keynote 9 on sheet p1.1.
05/24/2010 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Denied Provide a site utility plan showing the location of the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow assembly. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006, and COT Backflow Prevention Ordinance, http://www.tucsonaz.gov/water/docs/backflow-ord.pdf
05/25/2010 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide a design for the proposed Type I hood installation that clearly shows that the installation will comply with the requirements of Sections 302, 506, 507, and 508, IMC 2006. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.
2. Clarify which thermostat controls which heat pump on sheet m1.0 and label the supply and return ducts through the roof for each heat pump and make up air unit. Reference: Sections 104.2 and 503.2.4, IECC 2006.
3. Clarify how interlocking MAU-1, MAU-2, HP-1 and HP-2 for make up air sources for EF-1, EF-2, and EF-3 provides sufficient make up air. Reference: Sections 106.3.1 and 508.1, IMC 2006.
4. Clarify the design of the branch exhaust ducts for EF-1, EF-2, and, EF-3; where do the branches join together and where are the clean outs?
5. Provide structural calculations and details to show that the Type I hoods (and the Type II hood) are supported from the building structure in accordance with Section 507.6, IMC 2006. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006.
6. Provide information regarding the construction of the wall adjacent to the grease hood. Reference: Section 507.9, IMC 2006.
7. Provide specifications for the elevator sump pump and show the size, route and termination point for the pump discharge.
05/26/2010 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Project: 278 E Congress, T10CM01281.
AN Congress, Restaurant

The Electrical Plans have been denied for the following, address each individually and show what was done to address each.

1. Provide 2005 City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Calculations per Ord# 10035, as required by Commercial Submittals
2. Provide Fault Current Calculations from Service to individual Panels , as required by Commercial Submittal Requirements.
3. Sheet E5.0, Panel M-1 the 400 amp panel feeder has 2 sets of 4-250 kcmil & 1 #6 grd. Per 2005 NEC 250-122, the grd should be #3 in each feeder.
4. Sheet E3.1Circuits OLP1 7 and 9 in plan but not in schedule.
5. Sheet E2.1 Circuits L- 34,36,38,40,42, not listed in panel schedule.
6.Sheet E2.0, Circuits assigned to T 9,14,15,16, incorrect in panel.
7. Sheet E2.0, Circuit OLP1-7 not in panel schedule.
8. Sheet E2.0, Circuit L1-14, cannot find on lighting plan.
9. Sheet E2.0, Circuits L-16,20 and 25, not in panel schedule.
10. Sheet E2.0, Circuits T1-1,3,5, in panel schedule, cannot find on lighting plan.
11. Sheet E3.1, mark circuits and panels for Mau 1 and 2.
12. Sheet E3.1, cannot locate AC-1, indoor or outdoor, cannot find ex-fans, cannot find HP 4,5,7,2.
13. Sheet E4.0, Show location Elevator Disconnect, and required circuits per NEC 620, lighting,receptacle and AC on plan

Ray T Majuta
Elect Plan Ck,City of Tuc,PDSD,
5/31/10,
Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov
06/02/2010 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: ANcongress
T10CM01281
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 02, 2010

1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning can not approve the building plan until the site plan has been approved see T10CM00463.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956

C:\planning\grading\t10cm01281.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED:

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
07/07/2010 SUE REEVES OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
07/07/2010 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed