Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T10CM00802
Parcel: 12620001C

Address:
3400 E ZOO CT

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW

Permit Number - T10CM00802
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
04/05/2010 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Denied Please include the following fire sprinkler design criteria to the plans.
1. Flow data (static pressure, residual pressure, GPM)
Available from the Fire Department (520) 837-7029 or 837-7030.
2. The standard to be used in development of sprinkler system. (NFPA 13, NFPA 13R, or NFPA 13D)
3. The hazard classification of the building, including any special hazards.
4. The density required of the water supply.

Please indicate existing fire hydrant location(s), with dimensions to buildings and/or property lines. Refer to City of Tucson amendments to the 2006 International Fire Code (section 508) for spacing and location requirements.

Please show method of supplying fire sprinklers.

Documents say "Bid Set". Should be "Construction Set"
04/05/2010 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. SHEET 000-002; CODE ANALYSIS: THIS PROJECT SHOULD BE DESIGNED UNDER THE 2006 IBC. REVISE SHEET NOTE AND REVIEW/REVISE ALL DRAWINGS FOR THE 2006 IBC.
2. SHEET 000-002; CODE ANALYSIS: THE PROPOSED USE IS LISTED AS "RECREATION USE GROUP, CIVIC USE GROUP, NEIGHBORHOOD RECREATION, CULTURAL USE". COORDINATE THIS WITH THE "GROUP U (UTILITY AND MISC.)" OCCUPANCY CLASS LISTED UNDER "BUILDING CODE NOTES".
3. SHEET 000-002; BUILDING CODE NOTES: PROVIDE A BREAKDOWN ON THIS SHEET OF HOW THE 270 OCCUPANT LOAD FIGURE WAS DERIVED.
4. SHEET 000-002: LIST THE OTHER BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES INCLUDED IN THIS PROJECT, DENOTING SQUARE FOOTAGE, OCCUPANCY GROUP, ETC.
5. SHEET 000-002; GENERAL: PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON THE DRAWINGS INDICATING HOW THE PLUMBING REQUIREMENTS OF THE 2006 IBC, CHAPTER 29, ARE MET, INCLUDING WATER CLOSETS, LAVATORIES, DRINKING FOUNTAINS, AND SERVICE SINK.
6. SHEET 000-002; CODE ANALYSIS: PROVIDE A LIST OF THE CODES USED FOR THIS PROJECT. BECAUSE IT IS A CITY OF TUCSON PROJECT, USE THE 1994 EDITION OF THE ADAAG FOR ACCESSIBILITY.
7. SHEET OL-100; PLAN: EXPLAIN THE SAND STORAGE AND HAY STORAGE ELEMENTS. ARE THESE WALLS OR STRUCTURES?
8. SHEET OS-102; SITE KEY PLAN: A NOTE ON THE PLAN INDICATES AN OUTDOOR SHADE STRUCTURE ON SHEET 4S-101. THERE ARE NO ARCHITECTURAL OR STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS 4A OR 4S. CLARIFY.
9. SHEET OS-401; DETAIL 13: THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR A 10' WALL INDICATE WALL REINFORCING TO BE #4@12" O.C., WHILE THE SCHEDULE INDICATES #3@8" O.C. CLARIFY.
10. SHEET OS-401; DETAIL 15: A NOTE AT THE KEY INDICATES AN 8' HIGH OPTION, BUT THIS IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE WALL SCHEDULE. VERIFY.
11. SHEET OS-401; STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR DETAIL 8 ON SHEET OS-401.
12. SHEET OS-401; STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR DETAIL 11 ON SHEET OS-401.
13. SHEET OS-401; STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR DETAIL 16 ON SHEET OS-401.
14. SHEET OS-401; STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR DETAIL 17 ON SHEET OS-401.
15. SHEET OS-402; STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR DETAILS 5 AND 15 ON SHEET OS-402.
16. SHEET OS-402; STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR DETAIL 12 ON SHEET OS-402.
17. SHEET OS-402; STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR DETAIL 19 ON SHEET OS-402.
18. SHEET 1A-101; FLOOR PLAN: CHECK THE PLAN FOR EXITS AND EXITING REQUIREMENTS PER 2006 IBC. PER TABLE 1019.1 FOR 270 OCCUPANTS, 2 EXITS ARE REQUIRED WHICH IS PROVIDED. HOWEVER, SECTION 1015.2.1 REQUIRES THE DOORS BE MINIMALLY SEPARATED. VERIFY SEPARATION MEETS THIS CODE SECTION. IF THE HYDRAULIC SLIDING DOORS MEET SECTION 1008.1.3.2, THEY MAY BE CONSIDERED AS EXIT DOORS. PROVIDE VERIFICATION.
19. SHEET 1A-101; FLOOR PLAN: IF THE HYDRAULIC SLIDING DOORS DO NOT MEET SECTIONS 1008.1.3.2 AND 1008.1.3.3, THERE WILL BE AN ISSUE WITH SECTION 1017.3 FOR DEAD END DISTANCES. VERIFY.
20. SHEET 1A-801; DOOR SCHEDULE: EXIT DOORS 104B AND 116A MUST MEET SECTION 1008.1.9 REQUIREMENTS FOR EXIT HARDWARE. VERIFY.
21. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; TABLE OF CONTENTS: THE TABLE OF CONTENTS LISTS SECTIONS 4.0 (ERD), 5.0 (LSS), 6.0 (OUTDOOR SHADE STRUCTURE), AND 7.0 (RANGER STATION). THESE CALCULATIONS WERE NOT LOCATED IN THE SUBMITTAL. CLARIFY.
22. SHEETS 2S-101, 2S-301, AND 2S-302: THESE SHEETS WILL BE REVIEWED WHEN THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS ARE SUBMITTED.
23. SHEETS 3S-101 AND 3S-301: THESE SHEETS WILL BE REVIEWED WHEN THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS ARE SUBMITTED.
24. SHEET 5S-101: THIS SHEET WILL BE REVIEWED WHEN THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS ARE SUBMITTED.
25. GENERAL: PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS AND DETAILS FOR THE CONCRETE SLIDING DOORS.
26. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
27. GENERAL: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE ADDED FOR THOSE SHEETS AND CALCULATIONS THAT WERE NOT PROVIDED IN THIS SUBMITTAL.
04/05/2010 ERIC NEWCOMB ADA REVIEW Denied 1. SEE BUILDING COMMENTS.
04/08/2010 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Denied The calculations on sheet 0P204 indicate that an existing 2" water meter is serving this activity. What will be the total connected water demand on the existing water meter that results from the addition of this activity? (Note that 90.5 fixture units in a water system that is dominated by flushometer valves equates to 65 GPM, not 42 GPM.) Reference: Sections 610.1 and 610.2, UPC 2006.
04/09/2010 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Water-free urinals are not Code-compliant fixtures per the UPC. Submit an appeal to the Building Official requesting approval to utilize a water-free urinal based on the International Plumbing Code. Reference: Sections 211.0 (insanitary), 301.2, 405.2, 409.0, 601.1, and 1005.0, UPC 2006.
2. Detail 209 calls for the condensate drain from the water heater to be terminated in the landscaping. Provide documentation from ADEQ that approves of this discharge location. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
3. Clarify how water is to be connected to the various stock watering devices (e.g. the Nelson Drinker) and how backflow protection is to be provided. Reference: Section 603.0, UPC 2006.
4. One of the specified fixtures (Haws emergency shower) requires a minimum pressure greater than the 20-PSI used in the water pipe sizing calculations. Revise calculations as necessary. Reference: Section 608.1, UPC 2006.
5. Calculate the water demand for a system that is predominately for flushometer valves. Reference: Section A2.1, UPC 2006.
6. The applicable code for all commercial plumbing projects is the 2006 Uniform Plumbing Code with Local Amendments (see sheet 0C200). Provide an approved appeal to the building official if the plans are to be reviewed to the 2006 IPC.
7. Provide upper terminal cleanouts for the un-trapped floor drains serving the sand/oil interceptor. Reference: Section 707.4, UPC 2006.
8. Provide the maximum flow-capacity specifications for the sand/oil interceptor, S/O-1, and the minimum slope for the waste pipe serving the interceptor (i.e. will the drain pipe be sized to be self-cleaning). Reference: Section 1003.1, UPC 2006.
9. The scupper widths appear to be too short to accommodate the design rainfall without exceeding a 2" depth of flow. Provide calculations to support the scupper design or provide structural calculations to show that the roof is capable of supporting the additional rain load. Refer also to Section 1106.4, UPC 2006 and revise the roof drainage areas appropriately. Reference: Sections 1101.11.1 and 1101.11.2.1, UPC 2006, and Section 1611.1, IBC 2006.
10. Provide calculations to show that the size of the overflows in the roof drain collector boxes have a drainage capacity equal to that of the scuppers. Reference: Section 1101.11.2.2.1, UPC 2006.
11. Provide roof drainage calculations and plans for the roof sections without drainage. All roof areas shall be drained by roof drains, scuppers, or gutters. Reference: Section 1101.11.1, UPC 2006.
12. Specify the size of the gutter serving the ERD roof. Reference: Sections 103.2.3 and 1101.11.1, UPC 2006.
04/12/2010 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Project: T10CM00802-- Elephant Exhibit,
3400 E Zoo CT

The electrical plan have been denied for the following:
1. Correct Panel A overcurrent device from 200 A to 400 A on Sheet OE-102.
2. Sheet OE-102, Panel C load already added to total in panel A, correct total.
3. Cannot locate Panel D circuits 1,3,5, on plan.
4. No Electrical Drawings for the Ranger Station, only future ones in panel, is this for a future permit ?

Ray T Majuta, Elect Pln Review,
PDSD, City of Tucson,
4/11/10,
Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov
04/12/2010 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Reid Park Zoo Elephant Exhibit
T10CM00802
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 12, 2010

1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan.. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site plan with the next building plan submittal.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956

C:\planning\grading\t10cm00802.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED:
04/12/2010 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied See comments in engineering folder.
04/19/2010 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied need PCRWRD site plan review- 3rd floor- Engineering 740-6500.
need PCRWRD/IWC review- Tom Tomchak - 5025 W Ina Rd - 443-6200.
need PCRWRD review of air release manhole off 6" and 20" per pc-201
04/30/2010 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope and the mechanical equipment. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to compare the energy compliance of the building envelope with the energy code compliance calculations. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006.
2. Clarify the location of the low-intensity infrared heaters and indicate the required minimum clearance from combustibles. The architectural section (1/1A-301) indicates a different location within the clerestory area than the mechanical plan, 1M-102, that appears to provide inadequate clearance.
3. Show the required flue height for the low-intensity infrared heaters.
4. Specify the type of flue vent cap and combustion air cap to be used.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
07/09/2010 DELMA ROBEY OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
07/09/2010 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed