Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI
Permit Number - T10CM00644
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/17/2010 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/17/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | Not a COT owned/operated property |
| 03/18/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/18/2010 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Mechanical Comment: Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building addition. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for any fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. 2. Sheet S2.1; Foundation Plan: The footing near Grids E and 5 is marked as F1 (at future walkway). Should this be an F5? Verify. 3. Sheet S2.1; Foundation Plan: The columns and footings for the future walkway were not found in the structural calculations, but sizes are indicated on the plan. Clarify. 4. Sheet S2.1; Foundation Plan: Most of the columns and footings in the new restroom were not found in the structural calculations, but sizes are indicated on the plan. Clarify. 5. Sheet S3.1; Framing Plan: On Grid 2, above Grid B, there is a B1 beam indicated on the plan. Clarify. 6. Sheet S3.1; Future Walkway: Provide an indication (similar to Sheet S2.1) that the steel frames and beams are shown for reference only and will be designed under separate permit. 7. Sheet S4.1; Roof Plan: The interior spanning beam over the restrooms does not have a size indicated. Provide. 8. Sheet S4.1; Future Walkway: Provide an indication (similar to Sheet S2.1) that the steel frames and beams are shown for reference only and will be designed under separate permit. 9. Structural Calculations; Page 9: Did not locate beams B6 or B8 on this sheet. Clarify. 10. General: Provide written responses to all review comments. |
| 03/18/2010 | RMYERS1 | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/18/2010 | RICK MYERS | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The applicable code for all commercial plumbing projects is the 2006 Uniform Plumbing Code with Local Amendments. Provide "Petition of Appeal" from the building official for use of the IPC. 2. Provide site drawing showing the size, route, and slope of the building sewer. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006 Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole and the first floor elevation. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 3. Show how the temperature of the hot water supply to the public lavatories is controlled. Reference: Section 413.1, UPC 2006 and Section 504.3, IECC 2006. 4. Provide a vacuum relief for storage-type water heaters located above any fixture outlets. Reference: Section 608.7, UPC 2006. 5. Revise the termination of the primary rainwater leader so that it doesn't cross over the sidewalk. Reference: Section 4.4 F, City of Tucson Development Standard No. 3-01.0. 6. Revise the termination of the secondary (overflow) rainwater leader so that it terminates above grade in a location observable by the building occupants or maintenance personnel. Reference: Section 1101.11.2.2.1, UPC 2006dard No. 3-01.0. |
| 03/18/2010 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | need to show location/method of connection to public sewer. need 3rd floor WWM review/ Chad or Tom- 740-6547 |
| 03/18/2010 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Passed | Passed per Ernie Duarte direction. Historic review to be completed early next week. |
| 03/18/2010 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Passed | Engineering passed per Ernie Duarte |
| 03/18/2010 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | PROJECT: 300 E CONGRESS ST, T10CM00644, RIALTO BLOCK PROJECT ELECTRICAL PLANS DENIED FOR THE FOLLOWING; 1. SHEET E-2CIRCUITS B 26,28,30,32, ARE USED TWICE ON THE LIGHTING PLAN, CIRCUITS B-23,25,27, SHOWN IN PANEL SCHEDULE NOT ON LIGHTING PLAN. 2. TRACK LIGHTING TO BE CALCULATED PER 150VA FOR EVERY TWO FEET OF TRACK,THEN 25% FOR CONTINUOUS DUTY. RAY T MAJUTA,ELECT PLN CK PDSD,CITY OF TUCSON 3/18/10 520/837/4988 |
| 03/18/2010 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | |
| 03/18/2010 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/19/2010 | GERARDO BONILLA | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/19/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |