Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Permit Number - T10CM00311
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/09/2010 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/20/2010 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 07/26/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/26/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the submitted energy code compliance calculations (use Pima County < 4,000 feet, not the town of Pima, Arizona). Also, the exterior wall consists of 400 square feet of 8" concrete block with wood furring and R-8 cavity insulation, not two separate walls of 400 square feet each. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. 2. Clarify the termination point of the condensate drain for the fan coil. The note on sheet 7 states that the condensate is to terminate in a planter but the section on sheet 6 appears to show only brick pavers in this area. Reference: Section 307.2, IMC 2006 and Section 814.0, UPC 2006. 3. Revise the submitted outside air calculations. Neither calculation includes the 0.12 CFM/Square Foot required as part of ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2004. Reference: Section 401.2, IMC 2006; see also Sections 6.2.2.1 through 6.2.5.4, ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2004. 4. The air conditioning for the remodeled classroom is part of an existing system. Provide the required outside air for the total system, not just the remodeled classroom. The location shown for introducing the outside air into the existing air conditioning system could result in the degradation of the operation of a duct smoke detector if the system is over 2,000 CFM in capacity. Reference: Sections 401.2, 403.3, 403.3.2, 403.3.4, and 606.2, IMC 2006. 5. Provide the listing information for the proposed Type I hood. If it has not been listed per UL-710 for the proposed use, the minimum exhaust volume will be 1200 CFM. If the hood is listed for use with 800 CFM, the exhaust duct will have to be reduced in size to obtain a minimum duct velocity of 1500 FPM. Reference: Sections 507.1, 507.13.3, and 506.3.4 (as amended by the City of Tucson), IMC 2006. 6. The note on sheet 3 calling for modifying the wall behind the proposed range and hood ("furr wall 2x4") does not specify the type of supports to be used. Unless non-combustible supports are used, an 18" clearance will be required per Section 507.9, IMC 2006. 7. Clarify the note calling for a manual override of the automatic start for the exhaust fan. The requirement for the exhaust fan to start automatically if cooking commences is the backup position to a manual start. Reference: Section 507.2.1.1, IMC 2006. 8. Provide structural calculations and details to show that the Type I hood is supported from the building structure in accordance with Section 507.6, IMC 2006 (i.e. weight of the hood plus the weight of one person cleaning the hood). Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006. 9. Show the location of the grease exhaust fan and the makeup air unit on the roof. Provide structural calculations to verify that the existing roof is capable of supporting the additional dead load due to the installation of the units. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006. 10. The stainless steel "backsplash" shall extend a minimum of 18" beyond the hood. Reference: Section 507.9, IMC 2006. 11. Show that the termination of the grease exhaust fan complies with the requirements of Section 506.3.12, IMC 2006. |
| 09/22/2010 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Needs Health Department Review for new kitchen |