Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T10BU01569
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
11/19/2010 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: November 19, 2010 SUBJECT: 191 S Plumer Ave- 2nd Site/Grading Plan Engineering Review TO: George Hayduke LOCATION: T14S R14E Sec17 Ward 4 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T10CM02836 (Site Plan) and T10BU01569 (Grading Plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the revised site plan (T10CM02836), grading plan (T10BU01569), Hydrologic/Hydraulic Report (Stanley Engineering & Drainage, 08OCT10, 12NOV10) and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (Stanley Engineering & Drainage, 14OCT10, 14NOV10) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan at this time. The following items need to be addressed: DRAINAGE STATEMENT: 1) Completed. 2) Completed. 3) Completed. SITE PLAN COMMENTS: 4) Completed. 5) Restated: DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A: Revise the site plan (or plan set since all plans have been submitted as one package) to provide a sheet index on the first page for ALL 9 Sheets submitted for site, grading, water harvesting and landscape plan review. The sheet index should include the Water Harvesting Plan and the Landscape Plan since all plan sets have been submitted under one review. 6) Completed. 7) Acknowledged: DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A: Revise the typographical error in Keynote #2 to read "Grading." 8) Completed. 9) Restated: DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan to clearly match the grading plan for the location of the concrete headers at the water harvesting basins within the vehicular use area. The landscape areas within the vehicular use area (VUA) must act as passive water harvesting. 10) Completed. However a new comment is to revise the parking count shown for the parking space along the east side of the property. The site plan show 7@9-foot each, however there is only 5 parking spaces shown. 11) Acknowledged: DS 2-02.2.1.A.8: However the required bicycle parking seems to have been removed from the plan set, clarify. Refer to Zoning requirements for number and location of the required bicycle parking. 12) Completed. 13) Completed. 14) Completed. 15) Completed. 16) Completed. 17) Completed. 18) Acknowledged. 19) Completed. 20) Completed. 21) Completed. 22) Completed. 23) Completed. 24) Completed. 25) Completed. 26) Completed. GRADIN PLAN: 27) Completed. 28) Completed. 29) Completed. 30) Completed. 31) Clarify that the site plan clearly matches the grading plan for the location of the concrete headers at the water harvesting basins within the vehicular use area. The landscape areas within the vehicular use area (VUA) must act as passive water harvesting. 32) Completed. 33) Completed. 34) Completed. 35) Completed. 36) Completed. 37) Completed. 38) Completed. 39) Completed. SWPPP COMMENTS: 40) Completed. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised plan set that addresses the comment provided above. For expedite purposes the site/grading plan can be reviewed over the counter (PDSD Engineering Division comment only) for stamp approval once all items have been addressed. Please call to schedule an appointment when ready. For questions or to schedule the appointment I can be reached at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Planning & Development Services |
11/22/2010 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Alberts Auto Care T10BU01569 Grading Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 22, 2010 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not approve the grading plan until the site plan has been approved. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t10bu01569 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Grading plan and a copy of the approved site plan |
11/22/2010 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approv-Cond |