Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T10BU01569
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/20/2010 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Alberts Auto Care T10BU01569 Grading Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 20, 2010 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not approve the grading plan until the site plan has been approved. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t10bu01569 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Grading plan and a copy of the approved site plan |
| 10/28/2010 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: October 27, 2010 SUBJECT: 191 S Plumer Ave- Site/Grading Plan Engineering Review TO: George Hayduke LOCATION: T14S R14E Sec17 Ward 4 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T10CM02836 (Site Plan) and T10BU01569 (Grading Plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the site plan (T10CM02836), grading plan (T10BU01569), Hydrologic/Hydraulic Report (Stanley Engineering & Drainage, 08OCT10) and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (Stanley Engineering & Drainage, 14OCT10) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan at this time. The following items need to be addressed: DRAINAGE STATEMENT: 1) Provide a discussion within the Hydrologic/Hydraulic (HH) Report to include conformance with the new Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Ordinance and the proposed design of the project to meet all requirements within the Ordinance. 2) Provide a discussion and calculations for the required wall openings (basin weir outlet) at the proposed 5-foot high block wall separating the 2 basins in the northwest corner of the site. The water from all the basins on the north of the site must flow west and then outlet through the required scupper per the HH Report. 3) Revise or clarify in the HH Report the location of the ornamental steel fence that is located across the larger basin/channel along the north property line. The fence can not be an obstruction to flow and must remain open to allow water to drain per the HH Report. The HH Report must be revised to account for the obstruction and the site plan must match in design. SITE PLAN COMMENTS: 4) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A: Revise the site plan so that it is drawn at a standard engineering scale no larger than 1"=60' the architectural scale used does not meet the Development Standard requirements. 5) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A: Revise the site plan to provide a sheet index on the first page for the 9 Sheets submitted for site and grading plan review. Or revise the Sheet count shown on the plan set to read Sheet 1 of 9 and then be sequential on each sheet there after. 6) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A: Revise the site plan to correct the typographical error for the measurements in the northeast corner of the VUA. Two of the dimensions show; 2010' 8 11/16" and 3456'0." The site plan is required to be drawn at a standard engineering scale, see comment above. 7) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A: Revise the site plan and Keynotes to reference specific details and pages. Stating "Refer to Site Details" does not meet minimum requirements. Either provide a detail or Standard Detail Reference on the site plan sheet or specifically reference the details provided on the civil grading plan sheets for clarity. 8) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.4: Revise the site plan to provide a location map that meets the minimum standard. Provide scale (3"= 1 mile), north arrow, section boundaries, legal description, etc. 9) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan to label and dimension the required curb openings into the 6" extruded curbing that surround the landscape areas within the vehicular use area (VUA) that are proposed for passive water harvesting. Or revise the 6" extruded curbing to be concrete headers with the proposed wheel stops to allow drainage from the VUA into the planters. 10) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan to provide dimensions for the required back-up spurs within the vehicular use area. Verify the minimum 3 feet in depth, 3-foot radii, and a 3 foot separation between curb and any obstruction like landscaping or fencing. Refer to DS Sec.3-05.2.2.D for clarification. 11) DS 2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan to meet the minimum requirements of DS 3-05.2.1.3. The vehicle parking space shown just east of the proposed bicycle parking is required to be 10-foot in width due to the fence. When the side of a parking space abuts any vertical barrier over six (6) inches in height, other than a vertical support for a carport, the required width for the space is 10 feet to provide extra width to allow passengers to enter and exit the vehicle on the side where the barrier exists. 12) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.10: Revise the site plan to label and dimension the Sight Visibility Triangles (near and far side) for the PAAL access point at Plumer Ave. Refer to DS Sec.3-01.5.1 and Figure 16 for SVT procedures and criteria. 13) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.10: Revise the site plan and sign location to be outside of the SVT. Or provide a note in Keynote #22 to state that any monument signs within the SVT to be less than 30-inches in height. 14) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.11: Verify and label the required 18-foot radii for both sides of the proposed PAAL entry point per City of Tucson Transportation Access Management Guidelines (TAMG), Section 5.5. Refer to DS Sec.3-01.3.2.C for street development standards. Standard driveway entrances will require prior written approval from TDOT for acceptance. 15) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.11: Revise the site plan to label the driveway width in plan view to verify minimum width requirements per Chapter 25 of the Tucson Code. 16) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to label and dimension the required 5-foot sidewalk within the right-of-way of Plumer Ave per DS Sec.3-01.3.3.A. The dimensioned 4-foot width does not meet the minimum standard. 17) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to provide a pedestrian access along the east side of the building. Refer to Zoning and ADA comments for clarification. 18) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all onsite handicap and ANSI Standard requirements that may apply to this project. 19) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Revise the site plan to label and dimensions the required 4-foot scupper under the sidewalk within the right-of-way for the basin outlet. Per the HH Report a scupper outlet is required at this location. Provide a detail or call out to a Standard Public Detail reference for clarity. 20) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Revise the site plan to label and dimension the required wall openings (basin weir outlet) at the proposed 5-foot high block wall separating the 2 basins in the northwest corner of the site. The water from all the basins on the north of the site must flow west and then outlet through the required scupper per the HH Report. 21) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Revise or clarify the location of the ornamental steel fence that is located across the larger basin/channel along the north property line. The fence can not be an obstruction to flow and must remain open to allow water to drain per the HH Report. The HH Report must be revised to account for the obstruction and the site plan must match in design. 22) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Revise the site plan to label and dimension (Keynote #5) the required water harvesting basin located south of the proposed back-up spur along the west side of the building. The drainage from the Mechanical Equipment Yard must be directed to a landscape area for water retention or a drainage design must be proposed with wall openings to allow the drainage into the water harvesting basin along the right-of-way. 23) DS Sec.2-01.2.1.A.19: Revise the site plan to label and dimension the existing right-of-way for Plumer Ave. Label the roadway as "Public." 24) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.20: Verify that all existing and proposed easements are labeled with recordation information on the site plan, if applicable. 25) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.21: Revise the site plan to label and dimension from street monument lines to the existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways and utility lines. 26) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Revise the site plan to label and dimension the refuse maneuverability. The layout on the plan does not appear to meet the minimum inside and outside radii to allow the refuse vehicle access into and away from the proposed refuse container location without obstruction from curbing or parked cars. GRADIN PLAN: 27) Provide the grading plan activity number associated with the project where indicated by "T10BU-." 28) Revise the Keynotes on the civil sheets to correctly reference the Page where the details are located. Currently the Keynotes reference Sheet 4 however they are on Sheet 5. Verify the page numbering once the Sheet references have been revised. See site plan comments above. 29) Revise the grading plan and Keynote #46 to revise the width of all the proposed berms to 3-feet for construction and maintenance purposes. 30) Provide filter fabric specifications either in Keynote #47 or as a separate detail for all proposed spillways and splash pads for construction purposes. 31) Revise the grading plan to label and dimension the required curb openings into the 6" extruded curbing that surround the landscape areas within the vehicular use area (VUA) that are proposed for passive water harvesting. Or revise the 6" extruded curbing to be concrete headers with the proposed wheel stops to allow drainage from the VUA into the planters. 32) Revise the grading plan to provide dimensions for the required back-up spurs within the vehicular use area. Verify the minimum 3 feet in depth, 3-foot radii, and a 3 foot separation between curb and any obstruction like landscaping or fencing. Refer to DS Sec.3-05.2.2.D for clarification. 33) Verify and label the required 18-foot radii for both sides of the proposed PAAL entry point per City of Tucson Transportation Access Management Guidelines (TAMG), Section 5.5. Refer to DS Sec.3-01.3.2.C for street development standards. Standard driveway entrances will require prior written approval from TDOT for acceptance. 34) Revise the grading plan to label and dimension the required 5-foot sidewalk within the right-of-way of Plumer Ave per DS Sec.3-01.3.3.A. The dimensioned 4-foot width does not meet the minimum standard. 35) Revise the grading plan to label and dimensions the required 4-foot scupper under the sidewalk within the right-of-way for the basin outlet. Per the HH Report a scupper outlet is required at this location. Provide a detail or call out to a Standard Public Detail reference for clarity. 36) Revise the grading plan to label and dimension the required wall openings (basin weir outlet) at the proposed 5-foot high block wall separating the 2 basins in the northwest corner of the site. The water from all the basins on the north of the site must flow west and then outlet through the required scupper per the HH Report. 37) Revise or clarify the location of the ornamental steel fence that is located across the larger basin/channel along the north property line. The fence can not be an obstruction to flow and must remain open to allow water to drain per the HH Report. The HH Report must be revised to account for the obstruction and the grading plan and/or detail must match in design. 38) Revise the grading plan to label and dimension the required water harvesting basin located south of the proposed back-up spur along the west side of the building. The drainage from the Mechanical Equipment Yard must be directed to a landscape area for water retention or a drainage design must be proposed with wall openings to allow the drainage into the water harvesting basin along the right-of-way. 39) Revise the grading plan to label and dimension the refuse maneuverability. The layout on the plan does not appear to meet the minimum inside and outside radii to allow the refuse vehicle access into and away from the proposed refuse container location without obstruction from curbing or parked cars. SWPPP COMMENTS: 40) Per City of Tucson Code Ordinance 10209, Chapter 26 Section 26-42.2: "For land disturbing activities that fall under the jurisdiction of this Article, a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan must be prepared and certified by an engineer, or a landscape architect and submitted along with the application for a grading permit to the City of Tucson Development Services Department." The SWPPP report and exhibits must be signed and sealed by the engineer of record or by a Registered Landscape Architect, revise. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised site plan, grading plan, HH Report and SWPPP that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the plan review. For questions or to schedule an appointment I can be reached at 837-4929 Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Planning & Development Services |
| 10/28/2010 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to Landscape approval stamp. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/29/2010 | SUE REEVES | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/29/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |