Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T09CM03255
Parcel: 104061830

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL

Permit Number - T09CM03255
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/10/2010 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Approv-Cond Fire Conditions:

Future modular office to be at least 10 feet from property line.
05/11/2010 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved
05/12/2010 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Approved 1. A street landscape border, per Sec. 3.7.2.4 of the LUC, is a landscape area with a minimum width of ten (10) feet, running the full length of the street property line(s) bounding the site except for points of ingress-egress. Sidewalk or PAAL can not be located within landscape buffer.

2. A 6'screen along street frontages for outdoor storage must be provided per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Indicate screening elements on the landscape plan.

3. A 30"continuous screen along street frontages for vehicle use area must be provided per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Indicate screening elements on the landscape plan.

4. Storm water detention/retention basins shall be landscaped to enhance the natural configuration of the basin. Plants located in the bottom one-third (1/3) of the detention/retention basin must be adaptable to periods of submersion. Indicate treatment for basin on landscape plan.

5. Determine the disposition of Palo Verde Tree marked (D) within driveway entrance.

6. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan.

7. Additional comments may apply.
05/13/2010 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved
05/24/2010 ERIC NEWCOMB ZONING HC REVIEW Approved
05/24/2010 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: David Rivera
Principal Planner

PROJECT: T09CM03255
Rock Solid Solutions
Site Plan

TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 24, 2010

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. This comment was not addressed on the plan. Draw, label and dimension the 12'x55' loading zone as requested. The area and access used for the loading zone must be designed with the concrete pavers as approved by the zoning administrator.

Previous Comment 3, As indicated in the last zoning comment a loading zone must be provided based on the GFA and any extended area for the use. This area would include any of the storage area for the materials. As of this review the storage area is not clearly defined but it appears to be greater than 1,500 square feet and therefore a 12'x55' loading zone will be required. Draw, label, and dimension the loading zone. Revise the parking calculation text block to include a loading zone.

Previous Comment 11: Draw and label a fully-dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s). As of this review it is not clear if a loading zone is required because the actual use is not verified. Depending on the actual permitted use proposed a loading zone may be required based on the square footage of the building are and any extended areas applicable to the use.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.14

2. The following items were not completely addressed.
Add to the LUC code text block on the site plan sheet the following;
a. The number and size of required and provided loading spaces,

3. Previous Comment 5: The following were not completely addressed.
a. On the site plan there is a setback distance labeled as 5'-7" and in red a dimension of 10' for building one. Clarify the actual required setback by building codes and adjust the site dimensions as needed.

Previous comment: Label the building one proposed setbacks from the west property line and from the edge of the pavement from Jim Howard Place,

4. Additional Comments may forthcoming based on the revisions to the plans and the response stating how all zoning comments have been addressed. Please include all redlines made on this drawing with the next submittal of the revised site plan.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608.

C:\DSD\T09CM03255c.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents
06/02/2010 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
06/11/2010 GERARDO BONILLA OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
06/11/2010 GERARDO BONILLA REJECT SHELF Completed