Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T09CM02693
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/07/2009 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Please include the following fire sprinkler design criteria to the plans. 1. Flow data (static pressure, residual pressure, GPM) Available from the Fire Department (520) 791-3234 2. The standard to be used in development of sprinkler system. (NFPA 13, NFPA 13R, or NFPA 13D) 3. The hazard classification of the building, including any special hazards. 4. The density required of the water supply. |
| 10/09/2009 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Need to submit completed Special Inspections forms for approval as listed on sheet S1.1. 2. Submit written summary for all deferred submittals: sprinkler systems, steel trusses and etc. to be sent to Mr. LeeRay Hanly. END OF REVIEW |
| 10/09/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. As per sheet N1.1, APPLICABLE CODES schedule, the 2006 IBC is listed as the applicable building code. Which it is in the City of Tucson. Also listed is the American with Disabilities Act apparently for accessibility compliance. a. It is also noted that the toilet accessibility elevations and details are those complying with ADAAG design standards. b. The 2006 IBC, Chapter 11, Section 1101.2 DESIGN requires ICC (ANSI) 117.1 as the accepted accessibility code. ADAAG reviews are available for your project should you so desire by submitting an appeal to the building official. The appeal form is available on our website. There is a $120.00 fee for the appeal. Please submit the appeal in care of Mr. LeeRay Hanly. |
| 10/15/2009 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/16/2009 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/23/2009 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 10/23/2009 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Terry Stevens Lead Planner Comments: 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 10/26/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/26/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/27/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Appliances (e.g. coffee makers, smoothie machines, etc) to be directly connected to the water supply system that do not have listed, integral backflow preventers or integral air gaps conforming to Table 6-3, UPC 2006 require backflow prevention. Reference: Sections 602.3, 603.0, and Table 6-2, UPC 2006. 2. Provide a vacuum relief for storage-type water heaters located above any fixture outlets. Reference: Section 608.7, UPC 2006. 3. One of the specified fixtures (Moyer Deibel dishwasher) requires a minimum pressure greater than the 20-PSI used in the water pipe sizing calculations. Revise calculations as necessary. Reference: Section 608.1, UPC 2006. 4. The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department has issued a new grease interceptor sizing criteria that will affect your design. The new minimum size for a hydromechanical interceptor has been set to 50 GPM with a 100 pound grease capacity. Contact RWRD (Doug Kirkland, 520- 443-6200) to confirm that your revised design will meet their requirements. 5. Clarify Note 11, sheet P2.1: what is meant by "…in slab under Hotzi oven location…" Also, clarify how the integral flow control device supplied with the grease interceptor manufacturer is to be accessible and vented. Reference: section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 6. Provide protection of the trap seals for all floor drains subject to infrequent use. Reference: Sections 1007.0 and 1007.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 7. Clarify what is being installed in the rear sales area near the 3-compartment sink. An additional sink (hand washing sink?) is shown next to the 3-compartment sink but is not called out; a floor sink is also shown but is called out as both a floor sink (P2.1 and P2.3) and as a floor drain (P2.2 and P 2.4). Hot and cold water are being supplied to the floor drain on sheet P2.4. Reference: section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 8. The dishwasher ("N") is specified as indirectly draining to a floor sink (P1.1); where is the floor sink located? Reference: section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 10/28/2009 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/06/2009 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/06/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |