Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T09CM02572
Parcel: 10705121A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW

Permit Number - T09CM02572
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/28/2009 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Approved
10/01/2009 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. GENERAL: CURRENTLY THE DAY CARE AREA IS LISTED AS AN EDUCATIONAL AREA, WHICH FOLLOWS IBC SECTION 305 IF ALL CHILDREN ARE OLDER THAN 2 1/2 YEARS OF AGE. UNDER SECTION 308.5, THIS OCCUPANCY, IF ALL CHILDREN ARE 2 1/2 YEARS OF AGE OR LESS, SHALL BE CONSIDERED AN I-4. THE EXCEPTION ALLOWS THIS TO BE CLASSIFIED AS A GROUP E IF EACH ROOM HAS AN EXIT DOOR DIRECTLY TO THE EXTERIOR. PLEASE CLARIFY OCCUPANCY, AND ADJUST PLANS AS REQUIRED.
2. GENERAL: PROVIDE DETAILS, ELEVATIONS, AND SPECIFICATIONS ON THE HIGH/LOW DRINKING FOUNTAIN.
3. SHEET S-2 (DETAIL 7); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 45): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE THE RESTRAINED RETAINING WALL FOOTING SHOULD BE 18" WIDE, WHILE THE DETAIL INDICATES 16". CLARIFY.
4. SHEET S-3; STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 2): THE PORCH COLUMN IN THE CALCULATIONS IS INDICATED AS A 6X6 WOOD COLUMN, WHILE THE NOTE ON S-3 INDICATES A COLUMN C-1 (TYPICAL AT THE COVERED WALKWAY) WHICH IS LISTED IN THE COLUMN SCHEDULE ON S-3 AS BUILT-UP 2X6S BOLTED. CLARIFY.
5. SHEET S-3; STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS PAGE 4: THE INTERIOR BEAM B-4 IS INDICATED AS A 6 3/4X15 GLB IN THE CALCULATIONS, WHILE BEAM B-4 IN THE BEAM SCHEDULE ON SHEET S-3 INDICATES A 5 1/8X13 1/2 GLB. CLARIFY.
6. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS PAGE 40: DID NOT FIND THE LIGHT POLE FOUNDATION ON THE DRAWINGS. VERIFY.
7. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
10/02/2009 ERIC NEWCOMB ZONING HC REVIEW Denied 1. SEE BUILDING COMMENTS.
10/07/2009 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Clarify the energy calculation information shown on sheet MP-08 as compared to the data shown on the architectural sheets and the COMcheck submittal. In addition, the window notes 4, 7, and 8 on sheet A-9 are contradictory. Revise as required. Reference: Section 104.2, IECC 2006.
2. Provide structural calculations to verify that the existing roof is capable of supporting the additional dead load due to the installation of the mechanical equipment on the roof. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006.
3. Show how access to the rooftop equipment is gained without climbing over an obstruction greater than 30" in height. Reference: Section 306.5, IMC 2006.
4. AC-4 is less than ten feet from the roof edge, Provide a guard at the roof edge with a top no lower than 42" above the roof surface (or relocate the A/C unit). Reference: Section 304.10, IMC 2006.
5. The minimum size for a condensate drain serving any two mechanical units is 1". Reference: Section 307.2.2, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
6. Revise the ventilation calculations using the correct areas for the rooms, the correct A/C unit serving each room, and include the common ventilation calculations for AC-3, AC-4, AC-6, and AC-7. Reference: Sections 403.1, 403.3, and 403.3.2, IMC 2006.
7. Fire-resistant wrap for the grease duct and its installation shall comply with the requirements of Section 506.3.10 (1), IMC 2006; the specified Legacy Report only complies with the 2003 IMC.
8. Show that the hood installation complies with Section 507.9, IMC 2006 for clearances.
9. Revise the size of the grease duct for the Type I hood to provide a minimum velocity of 1500 feet per minute. Reference: Section 506.3.4, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
10. Provide structural calculations and details to show that the Type I and the Type II hoods are supported from the building structure in accordance with Section 507.6, IMC 2006. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006.
10/08/2009 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Denied Tucson Water limits a 1" meter to a maximum demand of 25 GPM. With the change of the water closets from public to assembly, the demand will be 27 GPM instead of 25 GPM. Provide a letter from Tucson Water confirming that the use of a 1" water meter will be allowed for this project. Reference: Sections 610.2 and 610.12, UPC 2006.
10/09/2009 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide a detail of the water heater installation, including the flue size, flue height, and flue termination. Show that the termination of the vent for the gas-fired water heater complies with the requirements of Section 510.6.2, UPC 2006. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
2. Provide the size of the specified combustion air louvers. Show that the net free area meets the requirements of Section 507.4, UPC 2006. Reference: Section 507.8, UPC 2006.
3. Correct the arithmetic for the water pressure and water pipe sizing calculations. The water closets appear to be for assembly use not public use and thus the fixture units will have to be changed. Reference: Section 610.1, UPC 2006.
4. Tucson Water limits a 1" meter to a maximum demand of 25 GPM. With the change of the water closets from public to assembly, the demand will be 27 GPM instead of 25 GPM. Provide a letter from Tucson Water confirming that the use of a 1" water meter will be allowed for this project. Reference: Sections 610.2 and 610.12, UPC 2006.
5. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (2341.58') is lower than the first floor elevation for this building (2342.8') by more than 12". The building sewers serving this building and all other buildings having first floor elevations over 2342.58' shall not be routed through the backwater valve shown on sheet D-4. Reference Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
6. Coordinate the building sewer design shown on sheet MP-01 and the building sewer design shown on sheet D-4. Reference: section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
7. The review for the kitchen plumbing cannot be completed until an approved plan from Pima County Health Department has been received.
8. Provide authorization from Pima County Industrial Waste Water Control for the installation of a grease interceptor. (In addition, the specified hydromechanical grease interceptor is not shown correctly sized or installed, based on the 2006 UPC and the manufacturer's instructions.)
9. No vent may converge with any other vent until it is at least 6" above the flood rim of the fixture it serves. Reference: Section 905.3, UPC 2006.
10. Specify the materials to be used for the underground gas piping. Reference: Section 1209.5, UPC 2006.
11. Provide a design for the termination of the sleeved gas pipe vent. Reference: Section 1211.1.6, UPC 2006.
12. Provide an automatic fuel shutoff valve for the gas-fired appliances located under the type I hood. Reference: Section 904.3.3, IFC 2006.
10/16/2009 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: 707 W. Miracle Mile
T09CM02572
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 16, 2009

1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved Development plan. Once all Planning and Development Services agencies have approved the Development plan zoning can approve the building plan.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956

C:\planning\grading\t09cm02572.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED:
10/16/2009 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Project: 707 W MIracle Mile, T09CM02572
New Multipurpose Bldg

The Electrical Plans have been denied for the following:

1. Sheet E-7, Key Note # 22 gives a feeder size from Transformer TN (122.3 KVA) to new panel N as 2 parallel sets of 4 #4 cu, and 1#3cu grd. Change this to the proper size. Also as per NEC 2005 250.30 A.3, the Grounding Electrode for the transformer is obtained from Table 250-66, for the combined total circular mils from both paralled sets.
2. Is the122.5 KVA Transformer,a commom size, cannot find it in my tables ?
3. Fault current F2 on Sheet E-7n is incorrect, should be 29,327 AIC.
4. Please provide the fault current calculations for new panels N, K, L, P, and H.

Ray T Majuta, Elect Plan Ck,
PDSD City of Tucson
10/19/09
Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/10/2009 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
11/10/2009 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed