Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T09CM02186
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/26/2009 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Please indicate intention regarding installation of fire sprinklers. (no area calculations showing allowance for sprinklers or a note saying no sprinklers are required) |
| 10/26/2009 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: T09CM02186 2222 S. Craycroft Rd. Site Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: 08/27/09 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Zoning acknowledges the provided letter from C. Gross. The letter only addresses whether or not the demolished building can be used for expansion calculations not whether this is full code or not. This is still a greater than 25% expansion Per LUC Sec. 3.3.3.12.B the expansion calculations are cumulative. Per the last approved site plan the existing building area was 14,904 sq. ft. and any building expansions are to be based on that number. Therefore the current proposed total building area of 19,722 sq. ft. (open structures such as a drive-thru do not count towards calcs). Therefore an expansion of 4818 sq. ft. in building area is a cumulative 32% increase. Full code compliance for the entire site is required. The parking area at the southern portion of the property if separated from the rest of the site, as indicated on the site plan, will be considered a change of use to a Parking Use (see LUC Sec. 2.5.4.2.A.17). The change of use will require this area to meet full code compliance. 2. DS 2-02.2.1.8 In the parking calculations the number of provided parking spaces indicated (150) does not match the number of parking spaces indicated on the plan (111). Revise. 3. DS 2-02.2.1.9 Provide bicycle parking based on the number of provided vehicle parking spaces. Will change based on comment #2. Clearly indicate the surfacing materials for the access aisle and the class 1 bicycle parking lockers. See DS 2-09.6.2. 4. DS 2-02.2.1.12 Please dimension all sidewalks within site. Minimum width for sidewalks is four (4) feet and meets all requirements per Development Standard 2-08.5.1 A 5' pedestrian refuge with sidewalk will be provided adjacent and parallel to any PAAL on the side where buildings are located. This will be required along the east side of the existing building A and the east side of the proposed storage building. Provide a pedestrian circulation path connecting all buildings on the site. Must connect from building A to building C without using the sidewalk in the ROW. Provide pedestrian circulation path to the trash enclosure. 5. DS 2-02.2.1.13 The indicated monuments signs located in the future right of way are required to be removed at time of widening of the right of way at no expense to the City of Tucson. Provide a note on the plans stating such. 6. DS 2-02.2.1.19 The proposed development along the east side of this project is proposing portions of the development (landscape border) being constructed in the future right of way. . A future site plan will be required to be provided showing how the site will still meet the code requirements once the widening occurs. See LUC Sec. 2.8.3.5.F. A copy of the required MS&R covenant can be obtained here at DSD. Recording docket and information for the covenant is required to be placed on the future site plan. Another possibility is to design the project to meet future MS&R widening. 7. Based on changes to this plan and responses to the above comments additional comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\T09CM02186-2.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 10/29/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | Mr. Gross's correspondenance of 13 October 2009 has no effect to the 100% compliance determination. Please reference Zoning comments from Mr. Terry Stevens. STILL APPLICABLE 1. Please provide an accessible route connection to the Craycroft pedestrian right of way. STILL APPLICABLE 2. Please provide a marked crossing at the one way auto entrance located at the North West corner of the existing building. Include all necessary ramps and detectable warnings. STILL APPLICABLE 3. As per the 2006 IBC, Chapter 11, Sectiion 1101.2 DESIGN, all accessibility design is to be as per this code and ICC (ANSI) 117.1. Please remove all references to ADAAG, redesign all accessibility elements and refer to the 2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC (ANSDI) 117.1. This includes detail 7AS-1 which needs to reference ICC (ANSI) 117.1, Sections 406.12 which requires detectable warnings for the accessible parking aisles only if the aisle is part of a marked crossing. Otherwise, reference comment 4 below. STILL APPLICABLE 4. Detectable warnings are not required at accessible parking aisles unless it is a part of a marked crossing. The accessible parking spaces South of the building are not required to have detectable warnings. STILL APPLICABLE 5. Please identify all new and existing accessible routes and provide spots grades through out the route at intervals sufficient to determine slope compliance with ICC (ANSI) 117.1, Sectiion 403.3. STILL APPLICABLE 6. Please up date the existing marked crossing located in the North West corner of the property with code required ramps and detectable warnings not shown on sheet AS1. A detectable warning must be provided in the accessible parking aisle just prior to entering the PAAL . STILL APPLICABLE 7. Please extend accessible route to the existing building financial service. Also please reference Zoning comments. Reference IBC 2006, Chapter 11, Section 1104. END OF REVIEW |
| 11/03/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/06/2009 | THAUSER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 11/06/2009 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/06/2009 | THAUSER1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |