Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T09CM02053
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/13/2009 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | The occupant load of over 50 requires one of the #11 pairs of doors on A1.0 to have panic hardware. |
| 08/18/2009 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 08/18/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. GENERAL: PROVIDE CODE ANALYSIS DATA ON THE PROJECT DRAWINGS, INCLUDING APPLICABLE CODES, GENERAL BUILDING SUMMARY, OCCUPANT LOAD, EXITING REQUIREMENTS, BUILDING AREA AND HEIGHT INCREASES, AND REQUIRED PLUMBING FIXTURES. BECAUSE THIS IS A CITY OF TUCSON PROJECT, ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS MUST FOLLOW IBC AND ADA ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES (ADAAG). 2. GENERAL: ALL LETTERING MUST BE A MINIMUM HEIGHT OF 3/32". 3. GENERAL: PROVIDE A CLEAR MEANS OF EGRESS PLAN ON THE DRAWINGS, IDENTIFYING THE PATH OF EXIT TRAVEL AND CRITICAL DISTANCES. 4. GENERAL: ARE THE TWO EXISTING RESTROOMS INDICATED ON THE PLAN ACCESSIBLE? PROVIDE A LARGE SCALE PLAN OF EACH ACCESSIBLE RESTROOM ALONG WITH PERTINENT WALL ELEVATIONS. 5. GENERAL: PROVIDE DOOR AND WINDOW SCHEDULES AS REQUIRED BY IBC SECTION 1008. 6. GENERAL: ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTAL APPLICATIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY LEERAY HANLY. 7. GENERAL: PROVIDE JOIST, BEAM, LINTEL, AND WALL ELEVATION HEIGHTS. THE ONLY BUILDING ELEVATION HEIGHTS ARE INDICATED ON SHEET A2.0, AND THOSE ARE NOT ADEQUATE TO COMMUNICATE THE VARIOUS ELEVATIONS OF THE STRUCTURAL MEMBERS TO THE CONTRACTOR. 8. SHEET T1.0; SHEET INDEX: PROVIDE ACCURATE INDEX LISTING ALL SHEETS IN THE SET. 9. SHEET A1.0; FLOOR PLAN (NOTE 26): REFERENCE WHERE THESE JOINTS ARE SPECIFIED OR NOTED (STRUCTURAL SHEET S2.1). 10. SHEET A1.0; FLOOR PLAN (CONCESSION AREA): TWO NOTES '4' IN THE SERVING COUNTER AREA ARE INCORRECT. VERIFY. 11. SHEET A1.0; FLOOR PLAN: PROVIDE VERBAGE ON THE DRAWINGS FOR THE LOCATION OF THE ACCESSIBLE RESTROOM PER THE IBC SECTION 2902.4.1. 12. SHEET A3.0: PROVIDE SIGNAGE REQUIRED BY THE IBC SECTION 1110. 13. SHEET A3.0: PROVIDE DRAWING ELEVATIONS AND DETAILS TO MEET THE IBC SECTION 1109 FOR ACCESSIBLE SEATING, COUNTERS, TABLES, POINT OF SALE SERVICE COUNTER, AND FOOD SERVICE LINES. 14. SHEET S1.5; FOOTING SCHEDULE: IS IT CORRECT THAT WALL FOOTING F1 HAS ONLY 1-#4 CONTINUOUS FOR REINFORCING? VERIFY. 15. SHEET S4.1; DETAIL 112: PROVIDE CISTERN INFORMATION (HEIGHT, DIAMETER, CAPACITY) ON THE DETAIL (TO BE VERIFIED BY THE ARCHITECT). 16. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 08/20/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SEE BUILDING COMMENTS. |
| 08/27/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide the waste and vent isometrics. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 2. Provide the size of the existing building drain at the connection point for the new drain line (keynote #8/MP1.0). Reference: Sections 101.5.1, 103.2.3 and, 703.1, UPC 2006. 3. Provide roof drainage calculations and plans. All roof areas shall be drained by roof drains, scuppers, or gutters. Reference: Section 1101.11.1, UPC 2006. |
| 08/27/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/27/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/02/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations (Pima County < 4,000 feet). Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. 2. Clarify the basis of the ASHRAE 62-1-2004 ventilation calculations with regard to the occupancy load and provide justification for the ventilation of the space. As cafeteria/fast food occupancy, the occupant load would be 250 people. Reference: Section 403.2, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 09/03/2009 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/03/2009 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/03/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |