Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T09CM01843
Parcel: 133224970

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW

Permit Number - T09CM01843
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/12/2009 ERIC NEWCOMB ADA REVIEW Passed
11/13/2009 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
11/16/2009 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied NEED DRAWING CLARIFICATION- PLUMBING PLAN P2.0 SHOPS 1 DOES NOT MATCH WLB'S GRADING & IMPROVEMENT PLAN SHEET #5 OF #7
11/17/2009 BETH GRANT COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Passed
11/18/2009 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC REVIEW Approved
11/20/2009 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Minimum size lettering font is 3/32". upper and lower case. Please resize all lettering that are less than 3/32 and reprint sheets.
2. Please send letter of summary for all deferred submittals to Mr. LeeRay Hanly.
3. Please provide completed Special Inspection Certificates for all special inspections as outlined on sheet S1.1.
4. Please provide structural details and calculations for all roof top mounted equipment.
5. At detail nos. 1/A6 and 4/A11, one 3" roof drain is not sufficient for the roof area drainage. Reference mechanical comments.
6. Please provide structural calculations and details for the parking lot lighting poles.

STRUCTURAL REVIEW BY ERIC NEWCOMB

7. SHEET S2.0 (FOOTING SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 4.8): F-1 FOOTINGS ON COLUMN LINE "4" IN THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A 4'-6" SQ. X 18" FOOTING, WHILE THE FOOTING SCHEDULE INDICATES AN F-2 FOOTING (5'-6" SQ. X 18") AT GRID "E". CLARIFY AND PROVIDE CALCULATION.
8. SHEET S2.0 (FOOTING SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 4.18): F-2 FOOTINGS ON COLUMN LINE "6" IN THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A 5'-6" SQ. X 18" FOOTING, WHILE THE FOOTING SCHEDULE INDICATES AN F-3 FOOTING (8'-0" SQ. X 18" AT GRIDS "E" AND "G". CLARIFY AND PROVIDE CALCULATION.
9. SHEET S3.0; PLAN 3: COMPLETE THE DETAIL REFERENCE AT THE OPENING IN THE ROOF.
10. SHEET S3.0; PLAN 1: COMPLETE THE DETAIL REFERENCE AT THE WALL.
11. SHEET S3.0 (BEAM SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 3.15): ROOF BEAM 10 IN THE CALCULATIONS INDICATES 1/2" OF CAMBER, WHILE THE BEAM SCHEDULE GLB-10 INDICATES 3/8" OF CAMBER. CLARIFY.
12. GENERAL: MINIMUM 3/32" TALL LETTERING IS REQUIRED ON ALL DRAWINGS. REVISE SHEET S3.0.
13. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.

END OF REVIEW
11/20/2009 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Project: 7101 E Broadway Bl , Retail
T0CM01843


The Electrical Plans have been denied for the following:

1. The Electrical sheets are to be signed by the EE.
2. The lettering font is required on Commercial Submittals to be a min of 3/33".Some notes on electrical sheets too small, the records dept cannot reprint smaller.
3. Sheet E-1, the lumen count differs on the schedule and the calculations for the City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting ORD.
4. Remove the note stating installation of grouping to be per California Code.
5.Provide a larger detail of the room in which the 1200 Amp Switch Gear will be in . Show demensions ,door width, panic
hardware,and compliance with 2005 NEC 110-26C.2. This section requires certain items for rooms containing Large
Equipment. Two doors may be required.


Ray T Majuta
Elect Plan Ck, DPSD City of Tucson,
11/23/09
Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov
11/23/2009 RICK MYERS PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Check North orientation on all plans.
2. Coordinate water service size(s) and locations on all plans.
3. Coordinate roof drains and overflows size and location on all plans.
4. Match the sizes and locations of the yardwater piping on all plans.
5. Match the gas plans on all sheets.
6. Match the sewer plans on all sheets.
7. Revise the roof drain sizing based on a storm of 60-minutes duration and a 100-year return period, i.e. 3” per hour. Reference: Section 1101.11.1 and Table D-1, UPC 2006.
12/03/2009 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved
12/03/2009 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Denied Reduced pressure backflow prevention assemblies are required at the water meter for multi-use commercial buildings. Reference: COT Ordinance 9976, http://www.tucsonaz.gov/water/docs/backflow-ord.pdf
12/03/2009 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide plans sealed by an Arizona Registrant. Reference: Arizona Revised Statutes 32-125, Board of Technical Registration Rules R4-30-304.
2. Sign and seal the Compliance Statement for the energy conservation code calculations. Reference: Arizona Revised Statutes 32-125, Board of Technical Registration Rules R4-30-304.
3. Revise the energy code analysis, coordinating the building components (e.g. the glazing) used in the analysis with those shown on the drawing. Reference: Section 302.2, IECC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
4. Coordinate the equipment tags used for the rooftop units with the structural and electrical consultants.
5. Coordinate the location of the roof access as shown on sheet M2.0 with the architect.
12/04/2009 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Denied PDSD Zoning Review Section

David Rivera
Principal Planner

December 4, 2009

Comments:

1. Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with the approved site plan. While the building plans comply with the approved and stamped site plan for zoning compliance the plans cannot be approved until the building plans reviewers have approved and stamped the plans.

2. Zoning will re-review the building plans on the next submittal to ensure that any changes that are made to the plans do not affect zoning requirements.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/09/2009 THAUSER1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
12/09/2009 THAUSER1 REJECT SHELF Completed