Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T09CM01636
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/13/2009 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/13/2009 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/22/2009 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/23/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. At the most Westerly drive entrance to the facility, please provide a marked crossing as per IBC 2006, Section 3.5, 4.7.9, and 4.7.10. a. This is also applicable for detail 1/A1.3. ITEM 1: 1ST RESUBMITTAL RESPONSE COMMENTS: 1. Sheet C1.3: Note 33 was changed to reference COT DTL 207. Details 207 are for public right of way standard construction only and are not compliant with ADAAG Please remove all references to DTL 207 and reference ADAAG 407 for Curb Ramps and 4.8 for Ramps. 2. Reference section 4.7.5; if pedestrians walk across the ramp flared sides for ramps are required, they may not exceed a slope of more than 1:10. Reference fig 12 (b) if they do not cross the ramps. Section 4.7.7, detectable warnings shall be the full width and depth of the curb ramp. 3. Please redesign all curb ramps to comply with the above ADAAG sections. Please provide large scale details of all different types of ramps showing all dimensions, slopes and critial details for ADAAG compliance. Please make all architectural drawings compliant with all civil changes and reference all large scale details. COT DTL 207 is not applicable. 2. Note 33 refers the ramp detail to the architectural plans. The architectural plans references the ramp details to the civil drawings. Provide large scale curb ramp details as per sections 4.7 for all different types of ramps including all required critial accessible dimensions, slopes, detectable warnings, marked crossings and landings. a. This is also applicable for detail 1/A1.3 and 2/a1.4. ITEM 2: 1ST RESUBMITTAL RESPONSE COMMENTS: Reference item 1 response comments. 3. Why is an accessible marked crossing required to the bicycle parking area? a. Again note 33 is used to reference details to the architectural drawings, ditto comment 2 above. This is also applicable for detail 1/A1.3 and 2/A1.4. b. If the ramps are to remain provide an accessible marked crossing as required as per comment 1 above. ITEM 3: 1ST RESUBMITTAL RESPONSE COMMENTS: 1. Please explain why the accessible curb ramps remain across this vehicle way and why do you not have a marked crossing between the ramps. 2. If the ramps are to stay then all detectable warnings must comply with section 4.7.7. 4. Reference accessible parking layout (site plan) to detail 1/A-1.6. ITEM 4: 1ST RESUBMITTAL RESPONSE COMMENTS: 1. If on sheet C1.3 the accessible parking detail were referenced to the architectural accessible parking detail 1/A1.6 the intent would be more clearly defined; the detectable warnings would be visable. 5. As per Development Standards 2.08.4.1.D, accessible routes are required to all Public rights of way, pedestrian ways. Please provide accessible route connection to Miricle Mile and to El Buritto Avenue. Please reference Zoning comments for exact clarification of requirement. Once revisions have been added to plan, further accessible review will be necessary. ITEM 5: 1ST RESUBMITTAL RESPONSE COMMENTS: 1. As per ADAAG, Section 4.3.2: " At least one accessible route within the boundary of the site shall be provided from public transportation stops,... to the accessible building entrance they serve. 4.3.2 further staes that that at least one accessible route shall connect accessible buildings, ... that are on the same site". Please clarify where this occurs for the new crime lab building. 6. At detail 3/C2.0: Delete the "L" shaped portion of the detectable warning layout. This is not required by code. ITEM 6: 1ST RESUBMITTAL RESPONSE COMMENTS: OK POST SCRIPT COMMENT: 1. As per ADAAG, Section 4.29.5: detectable warninmgs are to be a minimum of 36" wide. END OF REVIEW |
| 10/28/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/30/2009 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/30/2009 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved |