Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T09CM01368
Parcel: 20566099C

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T09CM01368
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/12/2010 LAITH ALSHAMI ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved
01/12/2010 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied The following comments have not been addressed from the previous review:

A Native Plant Preservation plan is required. If the set-aside methodology is used, the mitigation requirement is for a minimum of thirty (30) percent of the site to be set aside in perpetuity as NUOS area. The area to be set aside is required to be be delineated and legally described on the site plan (with recording data included) and legally protected by a document, such as a conservation easement (Exhibit C), recorded by the County Recorder.

The set-aside method typically requires an Environmental Resource Report that identifies the areas of the site with highest natural resource value. In this case the area identified on the TDOT Map as "Critical and Sensitive Biological Communities" would be an acceptable delineation.
01/13/2010 MICHAEL ST. PAUL ZONING REVIEW Approv-Cond CDRC TRANSMITTAL


FROM: Michael St.Paul, Planning Technician

PROJECT:
T09CM01368
11221 East Nebraska Road
New SFR
4th zoning review


TRANSMITTAL: December 22, 2009


COMMENTS: Conditional Approval.

1) This review is for a new single-family residence (SFR) in the SR Zone (LUC Section 2.2.4.2.A.1). Provide the correct zoning on the plot plan, in the site data information and on all the adjacent lots. The Development Designator is "C" (LUC Section 3.2.3.1.A) and the Perimeter Yard Indicator is BB (LUC Section 3.2.6.4). This site is subject to LUC Section 3.5.7.1.F.

2) Parcels 205-66-099C and 205-66-099D have been combined on September 9, 2009 to Parcel 205-66-099F.

3) Access has been confirmed by Jose Ortiz, e-mail September 8th 2009.

4) There appears to be a SFR on the site according to the records with the Pima County Assessor and the aerial photos. The maximum number of units in the SR Zone is one (1) (LUC Sections 2.2.4.2.A.1 and 3.2.3.1.A). The existing SFR must be removed before a C of O can be issued for the new SFR.

5) Completed.

6) Completed.

7)

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
01/29/2010 GERARDO BONILLA OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
01/29/2010 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed