Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T09CM01224
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/15/2009 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Please indicate location of existing fire hydrants, with dimensions to property lines. Distances may exceed allowable. Refer to C.O.T. amendments to 2006 IFC, Section 508.5.1. |
| 05/15/2009 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | NOT A COT OWNED/OPERATED PROPERTY |
| 05/15/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | SHEET 1: 1. Note 5 is not referenced on the site plan. 2. At Note 3, Change ADA to 2006 IBC, ICC/ANSI 117.1, 2003 Edition. 3. Show location of the accessible parking signage. 4. Provide a large scale detail of the Accessible parking signage plus "Van Accessible" signage. 5. Provide ramps as required and detectable warning strips at the crossing in front of the auto access doors. 6. The FS grade elevations on the concrete accessible route shown at the front entrance to the North side of the Accessible Parking is more than 5% slope. Please provide a large scale detail showing spot grades compling with 2006 IBC, ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 403.3. DETAILS 1/1 AND 1/2: 7. The space at the bottom of both ramps is not an aisle and therefore should not have stripping. It is a landing and a continuation of the accessible route and needs to be concrete. 8. Remove the detectable warning strips; they are in the wrong place and are not required as access to parking aisle. The parking aisle is a safe zone. 9. At the first **Note, delete the reference to (ADA) and update the ANSI "98 Edition" to the "2003 Edition". 10. At the second **Note: All pedestrian circulation (Accessible Routes) running slopes is to be no more than 1:20 (5%) and the cross slopes is to be 1:48 (2%) maximum as per 2006 IBC, ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 403.3. Please correct note to this requirement. 11. Note 9 is not referenced. END OF REVIEW |
| 05/21/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 3033 N. Stone Avenue - Auto Sales T09CM01224 Site Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 21, 2009 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance. 2. Provide City of Tucson approved plans for the lot split. 3. In the lower right hand corner of the title block you show sheet 1 & 2 of 10/12, where are the other 8 or 10 sheets. 4. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.5 The east/west property dimension does not match what is shown on the Assessors Record May, please clarify. 5. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Provide a typical parking space detail for a standard vehicle parking spaces. 6. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 On the bicycle parking detail indicate how lighting will be provided to the bicycle parking. 7. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Clearly indicate on the plan what is vehicle display and what is required vehicle parking. 8. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Provide a parking area access lane (PAAL) width for the PAAL between what appears to be the required vehicle parking spaces. 9. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Per D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.1 A vehicular use area must be provided with post barricades or wheel stop curbing designed to prevent parked vehicles from extending beyond the property lines; damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings; or overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas or unpaved areas on or off site and to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the site. This said some type of barrier is required along the south property line and the vehicle use area and along the southwest vehicle use area. 10. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 The area shown striped along the east side of the proposed building is required to be a sidewalk 11. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 The area shown striped between the handicapped access aisle ramps is required to be a sidewalk 12. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 There is a power pole called out under Keynote 17 that appears to encroach into the proposed sidewalk. Clearly indicate on the plan that a minimum 4'-0" sidewalk will be maintained about the power pole. 13. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 If applicable show the location, type, size and height of any existing or proposed signage on the site plan. 14. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.14 Fully dimension and show the maneuvering area for the proposed loading space. 15. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.18 Label Stone Avenue as an MS&R route. 16. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.19 On the "(E) SITE & GRADING PLAN" the right-of-way (ROW) is dimensioned as "50'-5" (F) ½ ROW" on the "(F) SITE & GRADING PLAN" the right-of-way (ROW) is dimensioned as "45'-0" (F) ½ ROW" please clarify how both can be future. 17. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 If applicable show all easements of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page reference. 18. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25 If applicable show the proposed site lighting layout on the plan. 19. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31 Show the existing use on the site plan. 20. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31 Show the subject to section "SEC. 3.5.9.5.A AND .B" with the proposed use. 21. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.1 List the gross lot area on the plan. Unless you are dedicating ROW of way to the City at this time the gross lot area is for the entire lot. Until comment 4 has been addressed the gross lot area cannot be verified. 22. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 Until comments 4 and 22 are addressed the floor area ratio (FAR) cannot be verified. 23. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 Until comments 4 and 22 are addressed the vehicle parking calculation can not be verified. 24. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 The bicycle parking calculation is not correct. Per LUC Section 3.3.4 RETAIL TRADE USE GROUP, Vehicle Rental and Sales, Bicycle: Four (4) percent - all Class 1. Also per LUC Section 3.3.7.8.B Any use providing less than fifty (50) motor vehicle parking spaces may substitute Class 2 spaces for Class 1 spaces. Per LUC Section 3.3.3.5 Bicycle Parking Requirements. The number of required bicycle parking spaces is calculated as a percentage of the total number of motor vehicle parking spaces provided. If the calculated number of required bicycle parking spaces is less than two (2), the minimum number of required spaces is two (2). 25. Depending on how the above comments are addressed addition comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\site\t09cm01224 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents. |
| 06/03/2009 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | Exception |
| 06/03/2009 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Show the correct ROW dimensions and clearly indicate SVT's on the landscape plans D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.19. 2. Within a vehicular use area, one (1) canopy tree is required for each 10 motor vehicle parking spaces and every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1. Additional tree is required. 3. Vehicular use area must be provided with post barricades or wheel stop curbing designed to prevent parked vehicles from extending beyond unpaved areas or to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the site D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.1 A. 4. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan. 5. Additional comments may apply |
| 06/04/2009 | RICK MYERS | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/04/2009 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: E. J. Ornelas & Assoiates DATE: June 4, 2009 100 N. Stone Avenue, Ste 1002 Tucson, Arizona 85701 Subject: Auto lot, 3033 N. Stone Avenue Site plan T09CM01224 (First Review) T13S, R13E, Section 36 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan and Drainage Statement. The Site Plan (SP) and Drainage Statement (DS) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP. 2. Correct the existing and future right-of-way dimensions. 3. Add note that "Existing drainage patterns are to remain the same". 4. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. 5. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 6. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11. Minimum 18'R curb returns are required for D/W's on an MS&R street. 7. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 8. Sidewalks, curbs and wheelchair ramps are required where applicable per D.S. 3-01.3.0 and installed with "Detectable Warnings" per ADAAG. 9. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 10. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. 11. Show all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27. 12. Show Site plan number (T09CM01224) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 13. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. Provide documentation from Environmental Service for curb service. 14. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 15. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out all GB on the site and at the D/W, if applicable. 16. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 17. List the consulting engineer and the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information. 18. See "red-lines" for additional comments and corrections on the plans. Drainage Statement: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DS. 2. A Drainage Statement is a brief description of drainage conditions applicable for a site which are not affected by 100 year flows of 100 cfs, of more……per S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.1.2. The DS must be submitted along with the site plan and accepted with the approval of the grading plan. 3. The content and format of the Drainage Statement should follow S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.2. 4. Show the project address or administration address on the cover sheet of the DS. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/3033 N. Stone Ave_SITE |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/08/2009 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/08/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |