Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T09CM00308
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/24/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/24/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/26/2009 | JOHN WILLIAMS | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Completed | Property resides in Pima County., A letter of compliance/waiver/payment must be received from Nicole Burdette with Pima County Transportation @ 740-6867 |
| 04/08/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Final approval of the plumbing plans will depend on receipt of the approved appeal to the building official to us the IPC. 2. Include the detail of the water heater installation on the drawings. Reference: Section 106.301, IPC 2006. 3. The gas pipe branches serving AC-1, AC-2, and AC-3 are too small based on Table 402.4(1), IFGC 2006 and the pipe lengths shown on sheet P7.1. The piping to AC-1 has a developed length of 97 feet, the piping to AC-2 has a developed length of 105 feet, and the piping to AC-3 has a developed length of 112 feet. A ¾" supply is required for AC-1 and a 1" supply is required for AC-3. |
| 04/08/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Refer to Section 307.2.2, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson and correct the condensate drains for the AC units as needed. 2. The specifications do not address the gas train requirements shown in Section 5.2, NFPA 37. The generator manufacturers typically do not provide this due to the multiplicity of local code requirements. Show that the proposed natural gas-fired generator meets the requirements of Chapters 5, NFPA 37. Reference: Section 915.2, IMC 2006. |
| 04/14/2009 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | TO: Jacob Lauderdale SUBJECT: Raytheon Low Frequency Chamber Site/SWPPP/Grading Plan Engineering Review REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold DATE: April 15, 2009 ACTIVITY NUMBERS: T09BU00198, T09CM00308 SUMMARY: The revised plans, SWPPP, Geotechnical Report and revised Drainage Report were received and reviewed. Engineering recommends approval of T09BU00198, T09CM00308 for issuance of a grading permit. The following permit conditions must be completed prior to final grading inspection approval. GRADING PERMIT CONDITIONS: The following 12 conditions apply to grading permit T09BU00198: 1) Call for DSD Engineering SWPPP and grading inspection meetings. For a DSD Engineering Inspection, call IVR (740-6970), or schedule with a Customer Service Representative at the Development Services Department, or contact DSD Engineering at 837-4888, or schedule inspections online at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Online_Services/Online_Permits/online_permits.html 2) A copy of the approved Grading Plans and Permits shall be kept at the site at all times, until final grading approval. 3) For inspection purposes, please fill out the enclosed "AZPDES - Posting Requirements" green sheet, and post it or a copy of the NOI, at construction entrance of the site at beginning of construction activities and maintain this posted document throughout project construction. 4) Additional erosion/sediment protection may be required at drainage outlets. 5) Operator certifications with signatures are required for commencement of grading construction activities. Remaining signatures from the operators must be on the SWPPP on the site copy of the SWPPP at or before commencement of grading construction. 6) Relocation and additional interim erosion and sediment controls may be needed at limits of disturbance and placed per Engineer of Record within boundary limits and shall be maintained throughout the life of the project. See associated SWPPP plan. 7) There shall be no disturbance outside of project boundary as shown on the approved plans. 8) Separate building permit applications may be required for any walls. 9) Due to potential for hydro-collapsible soils per geotechnical report, it recommended that there is no water harvesting or other ponding areas allowed within setbacks as recommended by the geotechnical engineer. The basins as shown and located away from the proposed building on this approved grading plan are acceptable. 10) Call Engineering Reviewer regarding any EOR proposed grading revision. 11) If grading construction is expected to last longer than the expiration date of the grading permit, contact DSD to renew/extend the Grading Permit. If inspections have not been completed before the Grading Permit expires, and the permit has not been renewed, additional fees and reviews may be required. 12) Prior to request for final inspection approval, all permanent erosion control improvements shall be installed and accepted by DSD including rock / established revegetation for all disturbed areas if not improved as per approved plan. If you have questions, call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services Department |
| 04/16/2009 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/21/2009 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 04/21/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |