Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T09CM00065
Parcel: 12217365A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T09CM00065
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/12/2009 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Approved
01/12/2009 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Passed NOT A COT PROJECT
01/14/2009 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Denied 1. Site Drawings SD-1 and SD-2 are very confusing. The drawings are from previous construction development under activity number T08CM00904 with changes incorporated for the new activity number T09CM00065. This is fine however, construction work for T08ZCM00904 was not removed.
a. Please revise SD-1 and SD-2 to show only the new work required by activity number T0CM00065.
2. In the new parking area located at the NW corner of the site, truncated domes are not required for the one new accessible parking space provided. If the Owner/Architect so desires to have them in this location, they need be only 2' deep and the accessible route must be 4' wide, clear of the detectable warning strip.
01/16/2009 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Terry Stevens
Lead Planner

PROJECT: T09CM00065
3103 E. Adams St.
Site Plan

TRANSMITTAL DATE: 1/16/09

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. DS 2-02.2.1.6 Provide all dimensions of the foot print of the proposed building on the site plan. Indicate the height of the tower also on the footprint.

2. DS 2-02.2.1.8 The number of provided parking spaces in the calculations indicates 71 spaces. A count of the parking spaces on the submitted site plan indicates only 68 spaces being provided. Clarify. The number of parking spaces indicated in the proposed expansion analysis does not match the site plan. Clarify.

This change may affect the number of required bicycle parking spaces required. Revise calculations.

3. DS 2-02.2.1.12 Clearly indicate the location and width of the sidewalk along the north side of the proposed building.

The new sidewalk at the north property line on the east side of the new vehicle use area appears to connect into the side of the handicap ramp which will not be allowed. Relocate the connection to the east of the handicap ramp.

4. DS 2-02.2.1.11 The vehicle use area at the west end of the southern most parking area near the southwest corner of the property will require wheel stop curbing to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the property. Per the last approved site plan this area had a landscape island which appears to have been removed.

5. DS 2-02.2.1.7 Provide a setback dimension from the proposed building to the back of future curb along Country Club Rd.

6. DS 2-02.2.1.31 In the tabulations on sheet SD-1 the number of proposed units, 19, is in conflict with the number of units indicated in the parking calculations (23). Clarify.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961

C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\T09CM00065.doc
01/23/2009 BIANCA RAMIREZ ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: January 23, 2009
SUBJECT: 4-Plex Site
TO: George Holguin
LOCATION: 3103 E Adams, T14S, R14E, Section 4, Ward 6
REVIEWERS: Bianca Ramirez, CFM
ACTIVITY: T09CM00065/T08BU00523R (First Review)


RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan, Grading Plan, Drainage Report

SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed site plan, grading plan and drainage report for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan at this time. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the site plan, grading plan and drainage plan.

Site Plan, Grading Plan and Drainage Report Comments:

1. Verify that project address is correct. Site plan indicates 3127 E Adams Street and the Site Review Card indicates 3103 E Adams for the address. Label clearly on site plan if multiple addresses are associated with the project.
2. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.4: Revise the project location map. Specifically simplify location map so that it is easy to read and less cluttered. Provide all section corners for one (1) square mile area.
3. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.6.
4. Label existing and future site visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. Place pedestrian site visibility triangles in the appropriate locations.
5. Provide all existing and proposed buildings and structures, including location, size, height, overhangs, canopies, and use per D.S. 2-02.2.1.6. Clarify sheet SD-1 and C-2 discrepancy with proposed improvements shown on sheets. C-2 only shows buildings, if SD-1 includes parking and buildings C.3 and C.4 need to be clearly show on site plan.
6. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11. Clearly dimension driveway widths and P.A.A.L.s.
7. Provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. Drainage patterns and finished grades appear to be located on the grading plan. Indicate drainage patterns and finished grades on site plan per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16.
8. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. Estimated cut & fill quantities located on the grading plan. Indicate cut & fill quantities on the site plan per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17
9. DS Sec.2.02.2.1.A.16: Provide drainage arrows for roof drainage and provide locations of all concentration points. Specifically show roof down spout locations proposed buildings at pedestrian circulation areas. A detail for the dimension of the proposed scuppers that are used for collecting onsite roof drainage at all pedestrian sidewalk is required, refer to City of Tucson details. Any scuppers proposed under the sidewalk will be designed and constructed to convey the 10-year flood flow. Provide a drainage statement showing scupper calculations that demonstrate that the 10-year flood flow is contained under the sidewalk.
10. Per dimensioned right-of-way, it appears that there are drainage improvements being proposed within the right-of-way. No drainage improvements will be permitted within the right-of-way, please relocate and revise accordingly D.S. 2-02.2.1.19.
11. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.19: Label the 11-foot future MS&R sidewalk and curb area for future curb on the site plan.
12. Verify that all easement of record must have been graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20.
13. Please label existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. Provide contour interval on plan.
14. Verify that all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening along with sight visibility have been identifies by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27.
15. Show site plan number in the lower right hand corner of each sheet per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29.
16. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. Provide dumpster locations, specifically the location at the new north parking lot. Label and show the maneuverability for refuse vehicles in plan view.
17. A Right-of-Way permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-Way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information.
18. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting".
19. All symbols on plans need to be indicated in legend. Indicate all symbols in legend and verify that they are consistent throughout the plan.
20. A Stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) is required during Grading plan submittal. See SWPPP requirements.
21. Verify that the grading plan and the site plan match. In addition, remove old grading sheets from the site plan submittal and replace them with the updated grading sheets.
22. For next submittal, please submit site plan, grading plan, drainage report and SWPPP all together as one submittal.
23. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

Drainage Report:

1. Drainage report will be reviewed with next submittal. Drainage improvements are located within the right of way. Revise drainage report accordingly.
2. Provide detail within Drainage Report for the drainage improvement located in the southwest corner of parcel for the outlet structure.
3. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

SWPPP:

1. The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) does not meet the minimum requirements of the AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). Revise the SWPPP to according to these comments:
a) Provide signatures for the Certification Statements the operators in the SWPPP Report. At minimum, one operator, either the engineer of record or the project manager as listed on the bottom of the second page of the NOI shall sign one of the forms / operator certifications.
b) The remaining signatures from the operators must be on the SWPPP on the site copy of the SWPPP at or before commencement of construction.
c) Add a note to the SWPPP cover sheet stating that the operator shall report to ADEQ any noncompliance (including spills) which may endanger human health or the environment. The operator shall orally notify the office listed below within 24 hours:
i) Arizona Department of Environmental Quality
1110 W. Washington, 5th floor (5515B-1)
Phoenix, AZ 85007
Office: 602-771-4466; Fax 602-771-4505
d) On the SWPPP exhibit sheet, provide specific interim stormwater controls at stormdrain entrance/outlets and basin outlet on exhibits.
e) Provide copy of completely filled-out and signed NOI that has been faxed to ADEQ.
f) For inspection purposes, please fill out the enclosed "AZPDES - Posting Requirements" green sheet, and post it or a copy of the NOI, at construction entrance of the site at beginning of construction activities and maintain this posted document throughout project construction.
2. Additional comments may be forthcoming.



If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4928 or Bianca.Ramirez@tucsonaz.gov

Bianca C. Ramirez
Engineering Associate
City of Tucson/Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 837-4928 office
(520) 879-8010 fax
01/27/2009 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved
01/27/2009 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape & grading plans.
01/27/2009 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Confirm the availability of a 2-1/2" water meter. Provide the total connected water demand for the meter that will result from the addition of this building. Reference: Sections 610.1 and 610.2, UPC 2006.
2. The water supply to all new multi-family residential buildings shall be individually metered for each dwelling unit. The metering may be private or utility installed. If private meters are selected, the Tucson Water meter shall have a reduced pressure backflow preventer installed immediately downstream of the Tucson Water meter.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
02/02/2009 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
02/02/2009 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed