Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T09BU01283
Parcel: 115151810

Address:
645 W PLATA ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: GRADING

Permit Number - T09BU01283
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/10/2009 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied To: George Feltovic DATE: September 18, 2009
7471 E. Broadway Blvd.
Tucson, Arizona 85710
Subject: Flashings Inc., 645 W. Plata Street
Grading plan T09BU01283 (First Review)
T14S, R13E, Section 02

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Grading Plan and Drainage Statement

The Grading Plan (GP), Drainage Statement (DS) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Grading Plan:
1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the GP.
2. The GP cannot be approved prior to the approval of the site plan (T09CM02290).
3. Grading plan clearly marked "GRADING PLAN".
4. Edit Grading notes no. 1 and 15 to reflect that all grading shall be in accordance with City of Tucson Development Standard No. 11-01.0, Excavation and Grading.
5. Add the following note to the grading plan notes:
" "Any engineering work to be done below grade (i.e. toe-downs, cutoff walls, drainage pipes/structures, etc.) shall not be back filled until Development Services Inspector inspects the work and approves it.

6. Show Site plan number (T09CM02290) and Grading plan number (T09BU01283) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29.
7. Call out surface paving material.
8. A permit or a private improvement agreement might be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information.
9. Cut or fill slopes require a 2' minimum setback from property line.
10. Drainage patterns with percent slopes (Show patterns within the first 100 feet from the property line).
11. Flow arrows, grades and flow rates within and adjacent to site to show drainage scheme.
12. There is a discrepancy between the Site plan and the Grading plan pertaining to area west of the building. This area is shown on the site plan as an area to be depressed 6" for water harvesting and on the Grading plan as being sloped. Coordinate the Site plan with the Grading plan. The landscaping plan only calls out tree wells as the form of water harvesting. The entire area shall be depressed to satisfy this comment.

Drainage Statement:
1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DS.
2. A Drainage Statement is a brief description of drainage conditions applicable for a site which are not affected by 100 year flows of 100 cfs, of more……per S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.1.2. The DS must be submitted along with the site plan and accepted with the approval of the grading plan.
3. The content and format of the Drainage Statement should follow S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.2.
4. Show the project address or administration address on the cover sheet of the DS.


If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov
Paul P. Machado
Senior Engineering Associate
City of Tucson/Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 837-4932 office
(520) 879-8010 fax
C:/645 W. Plata St. Grad
09/22/2009 MICHAEL ST. PAUL ZONING REVIEW Denied September 22, 2009

Development Services Department
Zoning Review Section

Michael St.Paul
Planning Technician

T09BU01283 Grading Plans for T09CM02290


Comments:

1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. We cannot verify that the grading plan is in compliance with an approved site plan for this site. Please provide one copy of the stamped approved site plan with your next submittal.

3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the approved site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.
09/22/2009 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied Ensure that all Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to Landscape/NPP approval.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
09/28/2009 SUE REEVES APPROVAL SHELF Completed
09/28/2009 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed