Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T09BU00928
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/30/2009 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 06/30/2009 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Terry Stevens Lead Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 07/13/2009 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: July 13, 2009 SUBJECT: 1306 W Miracle Mile- Engineering Review TO: Elaine Weaver LOCATION: T13S R13E Sec35 Ward 3 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T09CM01636 (Site Plan) and T09BU00928 (Grading Plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed site plan (T09CM01616), grading plan (T09BU00928), Drainage Report (DOWL HKM, 19JUN09) and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (DOWL HKM, 19JUN09) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan or grading plan at this time. This project consists of a greater than 25% expansion per the Zoning Section review. The greater than 25% expansion requires that the entire site is reviewed and brought up to current full code requirements of the Development Standards and Land Use Code. The following items need to be addressed: DRAINAGE STATEMENT: 1) Revise the Drainage Report, calculation sheets, site plan and grading plan sheets and proposed storm drains to meet the minimum requirements of COT Streets and Maintenance. At a minimum the proposed storm drains are required to be 18 inch reinforced concrete pipes for maintenance purposes. Proposed storm drains at a smaller size will require approval from City of Tucson Streets and Maintenance. 2) Revise the developed drainage condition map and the Drainage Report to clarify the proposed Storm Drain Catch Basin (SDCB) #8 as shown on Sheet C1.5. All proposed SDCB must be clearly shown within the report with supporting calculations. SITE PLAN COMMENTS: 3) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.4: Revise the site plan to relocate the legend and location map so that it is not in conflict with the foot print of the existing building. 4) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.5: Clarify the proposed lot lines as shown on the site plan. All lot combinations will require approval from the Zoning Section of the City of Tucson Development Services Department prior to site plan approval. 5) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan and Detail 1/A1.5 to show that the proposed fence and gate is not encroaching into the 2 proposed parking spaces as currently shown. 6) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan to show a minimum unobstructed radius of 5 feet at all PAAL intersections, unless the PAAL is designated as a fire lane or access for refuse collection then a minimum unobstructed radius of 18 feet is required per DS Sec.3-05.2.1.3.b. 7) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.10: Revise the site plan to correctly label the future sight visibility triangles for the PAAL access point at Miracle Mile after revising the dimensions for the future curb and sidewalk location per DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.19. 8) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.11: Revise the site plan to label and dimension the required turn around area at the proposed gate location at the entrance from El Burrito Ave. Contact Jose Ortiz with Traffic Engineering (837-6730) for design criteria. 9) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to show the required 6-foot wide sidewalk with curb along the street frontage of Miracle Mile. Per the adopted Mayor and Counsel policy all sidewalks along MS&R right-of-ways for arterial and collector streets require 6-foot wide sidewalks. Verify that the existing sidewalk meets the minimum requirements. 10) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to label and dimension the required 5-foot sidewalk within the public right-of-way of El Burrito Ave per DS Sec.3-01.3.3.A. Revise all keynotes and details to label the sidewalk width at the required 5 feet. 11) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to label and dimension the required pedestrian circulation path from the proposed building to the required sidewalk located along the frontage of El Burrito Ave. The pedestrian circulation must meet the requirements within DS Sec.2-08. 12) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to label all offsite handicap access ramps within the public right-of-way on both streets to verify they meet the design requirements per the Public Standard Detail #207. Provide details and minimum slope requirements at all transitions from pedestrian circulation to vehicular circulation. 13) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all onsite handicap and ANSI Standard requirements that apply to this project. 14) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Revise the plan sheets and the proposed storm drains to match the revised Drainage Report. At a minimum the proposed storm drains are required to be 18 inch reinforced concrete pipes for COT maintenance purposes. Proposed storm drains at a smaller size will require approval from City of Tucson Streets and Maintenance. 15) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.19: Revise the site plan to label and dimension the required 12-foot setback measured from the future curb to the future right-of-way, for the location of the future 6-foot sidewalk and required space. Revise the dimensions on Sheet A1.1 for future curb location, sidewalk width and future SVT. 16) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.20: Verify that all existing and proposed easements are drawn with recordation information, location, width, and purpose of on the site plan. 17) Review and approval from TDOT Permits and Codes for all improvements within the public right-of-way will be required. A right-of-way use permit application will be required prior to construction. Refer to the following links for TDOT Forms and applications: a) http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/applications.html / b) http://www.dot.ci.tucson.az.us/engineering/pia.php c) Or contact Thad Harvison at 837-6592 for all additional questions regarding r-o-w. 18) Be advised that further comments may be forth coming on resubmittal of the site plan due to the full code requirement status. GRADING PLAN: 19) Revise the civil sheets or provided a table with Detail 4/C2.0 for all proposed riprap pad dimensions. Per the detail the pad lengths and widths are to be called out "per plan"; however the dimensions could not be located in plan view, clarify. 20) Revise the civil sheets, Drainage Report and proposed storm drains to meet the minimum requirements of COT Streets and Maintenance. At a minimum the proposed storm drains are required to be 18 inch reinforced concrete pipes for maintenance purposes. Proposed storm drains at a smaller size will require approval from City of Tucson Streets and Maintenance. Revise all associated keynotes and details to match. 21) Clarify within keynote #6, Sheet C1.5, the proposed number of scuppers at each location per the paving plan sheet C1.3. 22) Revise the civil sheets C1.3 and C1.5 to either label the existing storm drain to be demolished per the Demolition Sheet, A1.0, or remove it completely from the paving and grading plan sheets for clarity. 23) Revise Sheet C1.6 to label and dimension the proposed fence and gate location along with the required turn around for the PAAL access lane at El Burrito Ave. 24) Revise the civil sheets and/or Detail #8 on Sheet C1.6 to label and dimension all details for construction and installation for the proposed underground tank. Provide details on how the proposed roof drains will connect to the tank and at what locations. Or at a minimum provide a General Note that states, "The installation of the proposed underground tank will require a separate permit for review and approval by all necessary Development Services Departments prior to installation." 25) Please ensure that the grading plan is consistent with the site plan and Drainage Report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT: 26) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.6: Provide the Geotechnical Report referenced in the Civil General Note #4 as shown on Sheet C1.0. The geotechnical evaluation needs to address the following: a) The soils report shall provide identification / assessment of any potentially hazardous geotechnical areas, and state any geotechnical recommendations and whether there are special provisions for the soil preparation for this development. Report must also include a discussion and any recommendation for the proposed underground tank. b) Provide pavement structure design recommendations. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN: The SWPPP does not meet the minimum requirements of the AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). Revise the SWPPP according to these comments: 27) Part III.A.3 and VIII.J.2: Ensure the SWPPP is signed by a person meeting the certification requirements of Permit Part VIII.J. Specifically the owner certification on the exhibit must be signed prior to SWPPP approval. 28) Part III.C.2.d: Indicate the percentage of the site that is impervious before and after construction. 29) Part III.C.2.f: Revise the project location map in the SWPPP Exhibits. The map must identify the nearest receiving water(s) or other water bodies within 1 mile of the site. 30) Part III.C.3.c: Revise the SWPPP exhibit to label all structural BMPs identified in the SWPPP. Specifically for SDCB #8 as shown on the civil and the SWPPP exhibit. Straw bales are required around the CB. 31) Part III.D.3: Include a copy of the completed NOI form that was/will be submitted to ADEQ. The signed NOI is required prior to SWPPP approval. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Drainage Report, site plan, grading plan, SWPPP and the referenced Geotechnical Report that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the site plan and grading plan review. For questions, or to schedule an appointment, I can be reached at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Development Services |
| 07/22/2009 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Revise to correspond with any revisions to the site/landscape plans. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/23/2009 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |