Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T09BU00278
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/26/2010 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 03/29/2010 Mountain Vail Estates, Part A, Lots 1 thru 135 Grading Plan Comments: 1- The Geotechnical Report shall recommend the required setback from existing/proposed slopes whether they are created by a cut or a fill. Verify compliance with the Soils Report recommendation. 2- Provide the sediment trap elevations on Details #2/2, 4/2 1/5, 2/5 and 3/5. 3- It is not clear why Detail 5/5 was added. Clarify the need for all three details (i.e. 1 /4, 2/4 and 5/5. 4- Show a typical cross section detail for the proposed retaining wall between lots 64-66 and between Lot 82 and Basin B-1. The response to this comment is not clear. 5- Clarify if the spillway in Detail 2/6 should have a slope. Detail 2/6 does not show a slope. 6- Proposed streets profiles sheets were not included in the previous submittal. It does not appear that the new 12 sheets review fee was paid. The fee must be paid before the new sheets can be reviewed. 7- Clarify where Keynote #10 callout is located on Sheet 5 of 7. The response does not appear to answer this comment. 8- Call out any bollards at the end of Creosote Range Drive, north of Basin B-4. The answer to this comment states that Creosote Range Drive is access to locale residence. Clarify how this section of the is used as access. SWPPP Comments: 1. Show possible locations for stockpiling and waste storage areas on the exhibit. If you have any questions, Laith Alshami may be reached at 837-4933 or Laith.Alshami@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/30/2010 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 03/30/2010 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan at this time. 2. While zoning acknowledges that the grading plan is in substantial zoning compliance as it relates to the Zoning review purview, with the approved version of the tentative plat, the grading plan cannot be approved at this time. There are some areas on the grading plan that do not match the development plan. Please address the zoning review comments and revise the grading plan as required. (Engineering and Landscape Sections must approve the grading plan prior to zoning aspproval.) 3. Not addressed as requested. Previous Comment 4. Draw and label the 10' non-motorized trail esm't on sheet 7. 4. Please ensure that the grading plan matches the CDRC approved and stamped tentative plat. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the CDRC approved and stamped tentative plat. 6. Please be consistent with the submittal of the overall master grading plan cover sheet. This is under the assumption that the grading is being phased. Additional comments could be forthcoming. |
| 04/05/2010 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Ensure that all Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to Landscape / NPPO approval. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/07/2010 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 04/07/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |