Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T08CM03674
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/14/2008 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/14/2008 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. 1/8" LETTERING IS REQUIRED ON ALL DRAWINGS UNLESS A WRITTEN APPEAL FOR 3/32" LETTERING IS APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, JESSIE SANDERS. THIS APPROVED APPEAL MUST ACCOMPANY DRAWINGS SUBMITTED FOR CHECKING. 2. SHEET A2.1; SHEET A2.6; ENTRY DESK DETAILS: REFER TO ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003, CHAPTER 9, FOR DESK HEIGHT (34" HEIGHT REQUIRED FOR 36" WIDTH). 3. SHEET A2.1; ADA NOTES: CORRECT FIRST NOTE FROM 60' TO 60". 4. SHEET A2.1; SHEET P2; SHOWERS DESIGNATED P-7A: INDICATE SEAT WALL ON PLAN. 5. SHEET A2.1; FLOOR PLAN: AT URINAL IN MEN'S LOCKER ROOM, WIDTH OF STALL MUST BE 36" MINIMUM WIDTH PER FIGURE 305.7(a) OF ICC/ANSI. VERIFY. 6. SHEET A2.1; FLOOR PLAN: VERIFY IN WOMEN'S LOCKER ROOM THERE IS ADEQUATE CLEARANCE FOR 5' DIAMETER TURNING SPACE AT ACCESSIBLE SHOWER. MEN'S LOCKER ROOM APPEARS ADEQUATE. 7. SHEET A8.2; SECTION 2: METAL STUD DIAGONAL BRACES SHOULD ALTERNATE. INDICATE CONNECTION OF BRACE TO TRUSS AND TO TOP OF PARTITION WALL TO RESIST FORCES FROM IBC 1607.13. 8. SHEET A8.2; SECTION 3: INDICATE CONNECTION OF BRACE TO ROOF/FLOOR STRUCTURE ABOVE AND TO TOP OF PARTITION WALL TO RESIST FORCES FROM IBC 1607.13. 9. SHEET G-1; FIGURE 604.5.1: VERTICAL GRAB BAR REQUIRED PER ICC/ANSI, FIGURE 604.5.1. 10. SHEETS G-1 THROUGH G-4: REMOVE DETAILS THAT ARE NOT PERTINENT TO THIS PROJECT. 11. SHEET S1.0; GENERAL NOTES: ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS REQUIRE AN APPROVED WRITTEN APPEAL FROM THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, JESSIE SANDERS. 12. SHEET S3.0; BEAM SCHEDULE: BEAM B1 IN SCHEDULE IS INCORRECT PER CALCULATIONS (PAGE 5). REVISE. 13. SHEET S3.0; BEAM SCHEDULE: BEAM B4 IN SCHEDULE DIFFERS FROM CALCULATIONS (PAGE 8). REVISE. 14. SHEET S2.0; FOUNDATION PLAN: SECTION 4/S1.0 CUT ON THE NORTH, EAST, AND SOUTH WALLS SHOULD BE 2/S2.0. VERIFY. 15. SHEET S3.0; FRAMING PLAN: SECTION 2/S4.0 CUT ON NORTH WALL IS INCORRECT. MODIFY. 16. SHEET S3.0; FRAMING PLAN: CUT SECTION 3/S4.0 ON PLAN AT NOTE 3 LOCATION. 17. SHEET S3.0; FRAMING PLAN: SECTION 6/S4.0 (2 THUS) CUT IN WRONG LOCATION (TRUSSES PARALLEL ON ONE SIDE). CLARIFY. 18. SHEET S4.0; SECTION 15 (AT ENTRY LINTEL): THIS SHOULD NOT BE SECTION 15. RENUMBER. WHERE IS THIS SECTION REFERENCED? 19. GENERAL: WHAT ARE WEIGHTS OF ROOFTOP MECHANICAL UNITS? DO THESE WEIGHTS FALL WITHIN THE 5 PSF ALLOWED IN THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS? |
| 11/14/2008 | JOHN WILLIAMS | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Completed | Impact Fee's Do Apply; Central District; 5,269 Square Feet Office Building; Permit Issued Through 1/15/09 = $19,708.64; Permit Issued on and after 1/16/09 = $26,173.70 |
| 11/18/2008 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SEE BUILDING COMMENTS. |
| 11/20/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide an end of run cleanout at the Shower, P-7 in room 8. Reference: Section 707.4, UPC 2006. 2. Provide a detail of the water heater installation, including the excess pressure relief, expansion tank, recirculating pump and valves. Reference: Sections 103.2.3, 605.5, 608.3, and 608.7 UPC 2006. 3. Based on the submitted fixture unit schedule, there is a hot water demand of approximately 8 GPM (footnote 3, Table 6-5 and Chart A-3, UPC 2006) at the water heater. A ½" supply pipes to the water will be too small for this flow (over 8 FPS and a friction loss greater than 3.8 PSI per 100 feet). Reference: Section A 6.1, UPC 2006 and IS 3-2003, Section 2.6. 4. The branch piping serving the urinal flush valve (approximately 15 GPM when flushed) will result in water velocities greater than 8 FPS. Limit the water velocity to less than 8 FPS for the copper piping. Reference: Section A 6.1, UPC 2006 and IS 3-2003, Section 2.6. 5. Provide the installation instructions for the mechanical draft system to verify that the flue termination complies with the listing requirements. Reference: Section 510.3.4.1, UPC 2006. 6. Clarify the dimensions of the louvers being used for the combustion air - 18"W x 12" H or 12"W x 18" H. Show that the net free area of the louvers meets the requirements of Section 507.4.1, UPC 2006. 7. Indicate the minimum slope for the horizontal rainwater piping. Reference Sections 103.2.3 and 1106.2, UPC 2006. |
| 11/20/2008 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 11/20/2008 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Terry Stevens Lead Planner Comments: 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 11/21/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Coordinate the energy code analysis with the building design (e.g. the flat roof does not utilize R-30 batt insulation). Provide sufficient detail on the architectural drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, the SHGF of the fenestration components, and the R-values of the insulation. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. |
| 11/21/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/26/2008 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/02/2008 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/10/2008 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Building Plan can not be reviewed until the approved Development Plan associated with this project is submitted. Provide a copy of the last approved Development Plan with the next building plan submittal so that it can be determined that the building plan is in conformance with the last approved DP. JG |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/07/2009 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 01/07/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |