Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T08CM03614
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/23/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/23/2009 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: T08CM03614 2335 S REFLECTION VISTA PL Residential Site Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 23, 2009 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. After reviewing the site plan presented for permits the following items have been found to be incorrect and must be addressed before the site plan can be approved. .a - The following comment is related to previous comments .a, .b, .g, Previous Comment: The area depicted as new NUOS on the site plan cannot be accepted at this time. The section of the presented NUOS area along the northwest portion of the site has been disturbed and landscaped. This area may not be used or counted towards the required percentage of NUOS area. Previous Comment .b: There appears to be sufficient undisturbed area to the east of the house and just north of the basketball court that can be calculated as NUOS area and is probably of sufficient size to meet the required percentage. Previous Comment .g: In order to ensure that the newly revised NUOS area is depicted correctly a survey with distances and bearings of the site plan and depiction of the NUOS area will be required and will have to be recorded. In addition, a revised and replat of the final may be required. The Final Plat may be an item that is still up for discussion and additional verification. We may have the answer to that question by the time you setup a meeting with us. .b - Include a copy of the email from the COT Engineer allowing the right of way to be considered as part of the 30-foot Scenic Buffer. Previous Comment c: The 30-foot Scenic Corridor Buffer has also been disturbed and natural vegetation removed and not replaced. Per the site plan an area just east of the basketball court has been disturbed. This area was not designated as access to the property on the approved tentative or final plat. This area must be revegetated with similar vegetation in the NUOS area. An area within the 30-foot Scenic Corridor Buffer which is just southwest of the garage has also been disturbed and was not revegetated. The 30-foot Scenic Corridor Buffer must be revegetated with same as or similar vegetation as in the NUOS area. .c - The drawing submitted does not reflect the building setbacks approved for the original construction of the dwelling. See redlines on the plans and revise as required. Previous Comment .d: The site plan submitted for review does not match the existing conditions on the site. The following are items related to the site that are inconsistent. The driveway is in the wrong location and configuration. The walls along the north, east and south sides of the house do not match what was built, The building footprint on the site plan does not match the actual building footprint, the pool and ramada in the rear yard (north side) were not depicted on the site plan, the landscaped area along the northwest side of the house was not depicted correctly, the landscaping along the southwest side of the garage was not depicted correctly on the plan (this may be an Scenic Corridor issue anyway that must be addressed). (The revised site plan must be accurate and consistent with the exiting conditions on the site. Accurate dimensions are needed in order to verify encroachment in to the SCZ buffer.) .d - I'm not sure if this item has been resolved. Previous Comment .e: After discussing the issues on the site plan with the Landscape Reviewer Joseph Linville the chain link fence around the basketball court may be an issue as well. My suggestion is to set up an appointment with Joseph Linville and me before resubmitting the site plan for review and approval. Please call Joseph at 837-4947 or David at 837-4957 for an appointment to discuss the site plan, issues associated with the violation, and solutions to approving plan that will lead to the abatement of the DNR violation notice. .e - Previous Comment .f: If for any reason, other processes are needed, such as Board of adjustment variances those processes must be approved prior to approval of the site plan and any mitigation needed to abate the DNR violation. .f - Please keep in mind that the revised NUOS area must be recorded. The plan must include the distance and bearing for the revised HUOS area. Zoning will approve the plan once the zoning items are addressed and any required processes have been completed. Approval, in this case, by the Landscape Review Section will be required before the zoning section will stamp the plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\T0803614.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 09/24/2009 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Per the Final Plat, Basketball court appears to be located within identified NUOS area. All zoning and landscaping comments must be addressed and plans approved prior to engineering approval. |
| 10/02/2009 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) The 30' scenic route buffer area is to be revegetated with native plants indigenous to the site and the area is to be reconstructed to look as natural as possible per DS 2-06.7.1.B. Provide a revegetation plan that delineates where revegetation will occur. 2) Clarify that all disturbed areas on the site that are visible from the Scenic Route and are not covered by permanent improvements shall be revegetated with native plants, plants from the Drought Tolerant Plant List, or a combination of both per LUC 3.7.5.2.D.2. Provide a revegetation plan that indicates where the Sonoran Desert Seed Mix will be used. 3) See NPPO comments. |
| 10/06/2009 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Provide a record of survey that provides the area of NUOS indicated on the Subdivision plat. Revise the site plan to reference the record of survey and include the recording Docket and Page. Revise the site plan as necessary to coordinate with the survey. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/08/2009 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/08/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |