Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T08CM03436
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/21/2008 | JOHN WILLIAMS | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Completed | |
| 10/22/2008 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. 1/8" LETTERING IS REQUIRED ON ALL DRAWINGS UNLESS A WRITTEN APPEAL IS APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, JESSIE SANDERS. THIS APPROVED APPEAL MUST ACCOMPANY THE DRAWINGS SUBMITTED FOR CHECKING. 2. ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS REQUIRE A WRITTEN APPEAL TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, JESSIE SANDERS. AN APPROVED APPEAL MUST ACCOMPANY THE DRAWINGS SUBMITTED FOR CHECKING. 3. SHEET COVER; PROJECT DATA; SHEET CV REFERENCE DRAWINGS: UNDER THE HEADING 'BUILDING AREA' ON THE SHEET COVER, THE INSIDE SEATING IS LISTED AS 85, WHILE THE REFERENCE DRAWING ON SHEET CV LISTS 100 SEATS. CLARIFY. 4. SHEET A1.0; DETAIL 2: PROVIDE THE SIZE AND QUANTITY OF CONNECTIONS FOR THE LATERAL BRACING (AT THE ROOF AND AT THE WALL), OR REFER TO STRUCTURAL. 5. SHEET A1.0; FLOOR PLAN: SECTION CUT 6/A5.3 IN THE CREW ROOM INDICATES SECTION THROUGH 'PRESENTER'S WINDOW' ON A5.3. CLARIFY. 6. SHEET A1.2; SECTIONS 2 AND 3: PROVIDE CONNECTION SIZE AND QUANTITY AT THE DIAGONAL BRACE (TOP AND BOTTOM). 7. SHEET A1.2; SECTION 6: PROVIDE CONNECTION SIZE AT DOUBLE 2X4 TO JOIST. 8. SHEET A1.2; SECTION 7: PROVIDE CONNECTION SIZE AND QUANTITY FOR 2X4 HANGER (TOP AND BOTTOM). 9. SHEET A5.3; SECTION 6: VERIFY DETAIL REFERENCE 4/A5.3. 10. SHEET A5.0; SHEET SD-4; TRELLIS CANOPY CALCULATIONS: COORDINATE CALCULATIONS WITH TRELLIS SYSTEM NOTES. CALCULATIONS INDICATE CHANNEL EDGE BEAMS AND SUPPORT BEAMS (AS SHOWN ON SD-4), WHILE INFORMATION ON A5.0 INDICATES TUBES. 11. SHEET S3.1; CALCULATIONS: CANOPY TRELLIS CALCULATIONS INDICATE 6X BLOCKING WITH 4 SIMPSON A35 CONNECTORS, 3/8" BRACKET PLATES, AND 4-5/8" DIAMETER THROUGH BOLTS WITH WASHERS (AS SHOWN ON SD-4), WHILE SECTION 1/S3.1 INDICATES DIFFERENT CONNECTIONS AND MEMBERS. VERIFY AND REVISE. 12. TRELLIS CANOPY CALCULATIONS; SHEET SD-4: CALCULATIONS INDICATE 1 1/4" DIAMETER SUPPORT ROD, WHILE DETAIL 3/S3.1 ON SHEET SD-4 INDICATES 1" DIAMETER. CLARIFY. 13. COORDINATE ARCHITECTURAL SECTIONS WITH STRUCTURAL SECTIONS ON SHEET SD-4 WITH STRUCTURAL SECTIONS ON S3.1 FOR THE CANOPIES. 14. RESTAURANT DESIGN STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: PROVIDE PLAN IN THE CALCULATIONS INDICATING JOIST LAYOUT/HEADER LOCATIONS/BEAM LOCATIONS/COLUMN AND FOOTING LOCATIONS/ETC. 15. SHEET S2.0; FRAMING PLAN: HEADER H3 ON PLAN IS NOT IN SCHEDULE OR CALCULATIONS. VERIFY. 16. RESTAURANT DESIGN CALCULATIONS: DID NOT LOCATE B5 THROUGH B12, OR C4, IN CALCULATIONS. VERIFY. IF THESE ARE PART OF THE FRAME CALCULATIONS PRODUCED BY THE RISA PROGRAM, CLEARLY IDENTIFY WHICH BEAMS AND COLUMNS ARE REFERENCED IN THE CALCULATIONS AND ON THE PLANS. 17. SHEET S1.0; FOUNDATION PLAN NOTES: NOTE 5 INDICATES THE FOOTING SCHEDULE IS LOCATED ON SHEET S4.0. CLARIFY. 18. SHEET S2.0; PLAN NOTES: NOTE 8 REFERENCES SHEET S3.4 FOR THE MOMENT CONNECTIONS. CLARIFY. |
| 10/22/2008 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Please include the following design criteria to the plans. 1. Flow data (static pressure, residual pressure, GPM) Available from the Fire Department (520) 791-3234 2. The standard to be used in development of sprinkler system. (NFPA 13, NFPA 13R, or NFPA 13D) 3. The hazard classification of the building, including any special hazards. 4. The density required of the water supply. Also, riser detail on sheet P3.2 shows 2" water supply feeding both domestic water and fire sprinkler system. Domestic demand would have to be factored into the hydraulic calculations for the sprinkler system. It is unlikely a 2" supply is adequate for both systems. Please investigate. |
| 10/23/2008 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/28/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/29/2008 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | ISSUED WITH GREASE INTERCEPTOR NEED PCRWRD/3RD FLOOR/IRD REVIEW & APPROVAL OF LOCATION/METHOD OF CONNECTION TO EXSISTING ON-SITE PRIVATE SEWER (EASEMENTS, JOINT USE AGREEMENTS, CAPACITY, ETC) 740-6544 |
| 11/07/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The applicable code for all commercial plumbing projects is the 2006 Uniform Plumbing Code with Local Amendments. Provide an approved appeal to the building official if the plans are to be reviewed to the 2006 IPC. 2. Provide plans sealed by an Arizona Registrant (civil plans). Reference: Arizona Revised Statutes 32-125, Board of Technical Registration Rules R4-30-304. 3. Clarify the relationship of the domestic water supply to the building to the building fire protection system. The detail on sheet P3.2 shows the two systems being supplied by the same 2" water service to the building but the utility plan, sheet UT01, shows separate 4" fire water and 2" domestic water supplies. 4. Appliances (e.g. ice makers, etc) to be directly connected to the water supply system that do not have listed, integral backflow preventers or integral air gaps conforming to Table 6-3, UPC 2006 require backflow prevention. Reference: Sections 602.3, 603.0, and Table 6-2, UPC 2006. 5. Provide calculations showing how the water supply piping has been sized. 6. Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole or cleanout. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 7. Provide sizing information for the rain gutter (details 1/A3.1 and 3/A3.1). 8. Revise the termination of the primary rainwater leaders so that they don't cross over the sidewalk (see also detail 4/SD1). Reference: Section 4.4 F, City of Tucson Development Standard No. 3-01.0. |
| 11/07/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Reduced pressure backflow prevention assemblies for the building water service are required to be installed in locations accessible to Tucson Water. Reference: COT Ordinance 9976, http://www.tucsonaz.gov/water/docs/backflow-ord.pdf 2. Tucson Water limits a 1-1/2" meter to a maximum demand of 50 GPM. Based on the submitted plumbing drawings, it appears that the demand will exceed 50 GPM. Provide a letter from Tucson Water confirming that the use of a 1-1/2" water meter will be allowed for this project. Note that the existing water meter is located on the property line, along Kolb Road. |
| 11/10/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations using the correct climate zone for Pima County (< 4,000 feet, not >= 4,000 feet). Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. 2. Provide the installed weight of the rooftop equipment (e.g. exhaust fans and condensing units). Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006. 3. Coordinate the installed weight of units P-1 (1550 lb) and D-1 (1539 lb) with the structural drawing, S-2.0, which indicates an installed weight of 1350 lb for each. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006. 4. Show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drains. Reference: Section 307.2, IMC 2006 and Section 814.0, UPC 2006. 5. Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation. Reference: Section 401.2, IMC 2006. 6. Provide information to show that the proposed grease duct insulation system (detail on M3.1) complies with ASTM E 2336. Reference: Section 506.3.10 (1), IMC 2006. 7. Provide structural calculations and details to show that the Type I hoods are supported from the building structure in accordance with Section 507.6, IMC 2006. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006. 8. Show the location of the smoke detectors in the return air duct (upstream of any outside air connections) for all air distribution systems with a capacity greater than 2,000 CFM. Reference: Section 606.1, IMC 2006. |
| 11/14/2008 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Project; 7090 E 22nd St, Tucson AZ New McDonald's T08CM03436 The Electrical Plan for this project has been denied for the following items, provide response for individual items and indicate actions to resolve them. 1. Provide a Fault Current Analysis beginning at the service going on through to the individual panels.You can obtain fault current values available at the utility source through Tucson Electric Power , contact 520-918-8300 New Construction. 2. Provide compliance calculation for outside lighting which meets the current 2005 City of Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code Ord # 10135. This is required within the City Limits and can be obtained through The City Of Tucson Web Page by going to Development Services Department, Codes and Ordinances, Building Codes and to City of Tucson/Pima County Lighting Ordinance. 3. Sheet E1.1(Electrical Site Plan), the circuits assigned to the poles and signs do not show as the same items in the panel schedules. Check circuit AP-2-25, in the panel schedule circuit 25 is part of a coffee brewer . 4. Sheet E2.0 note refers to sheet M1.0 for roof plan, please provide the electrical information for the circuitry wire sizes, conduits, disconnects and fusing if used , on Sheet M1.0 for all electrical equipment on the roof. Or provide an electrical sheet which shows all electrical equipment on roof with the information required. Ray T Majuta Electrical Plan Check City of Tucson, AZ DSD 11/17/08 520-837-4988 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/21/2008 | GERARDO BONILLA | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/21/2008 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |