Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T08CM01986
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/19/2008 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 09/19/2008 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Terry Stevens Lead Planner Comments: 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 09/22/2008 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. 2 SETS OF DRAWINGS REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL. 2. REFERENCE PREVIOUS COMMENT 3 ON SHEET A4.0: TITLE UNDER THE PLAN STILL INDICATES 'PRELIMINARY'. CLARIFY. 3. 2 SETS OF PREFABRICATED METAL BUILDING DRAWINGS REQUIRED. 4. REFERENCE PREVIOUS COMMENT 7 ON SHEET A2.0: STRUCTURAL SECTIONS 107 AND 108 ON SHEET S2.0 STILL ARE NOT COORDINATED WITH ARCHITECTURAL SECTIONS 1 AND 2 ON SHEET A2.0 (1/2" BLOCKOUT AND NO CMU WALL INDICATED). CLARIFY. 5. SHEET S1.0; FOUNDATION PLAN: COLUMN FOOTING F1 AT GRIDS 4 AND G SHOULD BE AT GRIDS 8 AND E. REVISE. 6. SHEET S1.0; FOUNDATION PLAN: F2 FOOTING AT GRIDS 2 AND G IS LARGER THAN 2'-0" SQUARE AS INDICATED IN FOOTING SCHEDULE, SINCE 2'-0" DIMENSION FROM GRID 1 TO 2. CLARIFY. |
| 09/22/2008 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/23/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the envelope energy calculations to reflect the building shown on the plans. 2. Clarify the manner in which the fan coils are being supported on the ceiling joists. 3. Correct the common area ventilation calculations. 4. The minimum insulation for ducts located in indirectly conditioned spaces within the building envelope is R-4.2 (installed). Reference: Section 503.2.7, IECC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson |
| 09/23/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide backflow protection for the water connection to the steam generator. 2. Correct detail 204 to reflect the manner in which the water heater is to be supported on the ceiling joists. 3. Correct the labeling on detail 212. |
| 09/23/2008 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/24/2008 | CPIERCE1 | WWM | REVIEW | Needs Review |