Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T08CM01986
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/21/2008 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: T08CM01986 266 E. Missouri St. Site Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: 07/21/08 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The following can be used as zoning comments for application for the DDO. Contact Michael Taku @ 837-4963 for further submittal requirements for a DDO. DS 2-02.2.1.7 This project does not meet the requirements for setbacks as per LUC 3.2.6.3. On cul-de-sac and eyebrow front lots, the minimum street perimeter yard depth may be measured from a straight line drawn between the front lot corners, rather than measured directly from the curved front property line, except as provided in Sec. 3.2.6.5.B.2. In no case, however, shall the minimum street perimeter yard be reduced in excess of fifty (50) percent by this alternative measurement. Based on dimensions shown on the site plan the minimum required setbacks from the street property line to the cantilevered canopy is twenty seven (27) feet. Owner is proposing a setback of eleven (11) feet. Based on dimensions shown on the site plan the minimum required setbacks from the street property line to the building is twenty five (25) feet eight (8) inches. Owner is proposing a setback of seventeen (17) feet. A Design Development Option (DDO) is required. If the DDO is approved, provide on the site plan the DDO case number, date of approval, and any conditions of approval. 2. Per DS 3-05.2.3.C.1 vehicle use areas are required to have wheel stop curbing or barriers in order to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the property. Along the west side of the rear porch area wheel stops or curbing will be required as it appears the slab for the porch area is flush with the adjacent grade. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\T08CM01986-2.doc |
| 07/31/2008 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/31/2008 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. All plant material used for landscaping shall be selected from the Drought Tolerant Plant List in Development Standard 2-16.0. Strelitzia Reginea (Tropical Bird of Paradise) is not on the list, Caesalpinia pulcherrima Red Bird of Paradise is an appropriate plant material. 2. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Show 5' pedestrian access on the landscape plan indicated on the site plan. 3. Include with re-submittal DDO approval documentation. Indicate on the lower right hand corner of the site plan, the case number, date of approval, and any conditions imposed. 4. Additional comments may apply |
| 08/12/2008 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: August 13, 2008 SUBJECT: Site Plan TO: Philip Venezano LOCATION: 266 E Missouri Street, T14S, R13E, Section 36, Ward 5 REVIEWERS: Bianca Ramirez, CFM ACTIVITY: T08CM01986 (Second Review) RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed site plan for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan at this time. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the site plan. Site Plan: 1. - 10. Complied 11 Per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. Provide contour interval on plan below the scale and north arrow. 12. - Complied 13. Show site plan activity number in the lower right hand corner of each sheet included in the site plan or site/grading plan per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 14. Proof of approval from Environmental Services should be provided to the engineering department prior to approval per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. 15. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 16. 17. Call out scuppers on the site plan. 18. Complied 19. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". Revise added to read "Maximum". 20. Complied 21. Detention basin cannot be placed over an electrical easement - awaiting supporting documentation. 22. Revise keynote #17 to meet the minimum recommendations outlined within the geotechnical report. 23. Recent change to FINE on handicap sign has been made- please revise to $532 FINE. 24. Keynote 10 along northwest portion of parcel appears to be labeled incorrectly. Please clarify or revise accordingly. 25. Verify that all text is a minimum of 12 point font. 26. Label on site plan or in keynote that sidewalks are raised. Include height on the plan. 27. Call out radius for back up spur. 28. Clarify why a portion of sidewalk has hatch marking through the sidewalk area. Add symbol to the site plan legend. 29. Add Drainage Report engineer and GeoTechnical Report along with pertinent information to the site plan. 30. Additional comments may be forthcoming. DRAINAGE REPORT 1. Add activity number to the Drainage Report. 2. Add seal and signature to the Table of Contents sheet. 3. Verify that last sentence of of the Introduction and Purpose is correct. 4. Provide Objectives and Procedures 5. Identify concentration points on basin map. 6. Provide calcuations for Vs (Equ 3.4) and Vs (Equ 3.5) called out in table for Detention/Retention Volume Estimates. 7. Provide a site plan (On-Site Exhibit) that clearly shows the location of all proposed detention systems, including location, size and type of inflow and outflow structures. Include flow arrows and drainage divides and label on plan. 8. Provide detail of revised basin configuration. Basin side slopes: continuous uniform slopes shall not exceed 20 percent of the basin perimeter. Remove wall from within detention basin. A. Natural looking basins are required within the City of Tucson. B. Multiuse: Requires Less than 3 feet deep; maximum 2:1 for protected side slopes and 3:1 for unprotected slopes. 9. Provide Summary and Conclusion. 10. Either explain/verify that HEC represents what is being identified in the table for detention. Detention basin outflow = 5.08 cfs per Stormwater Basin Routing Summary. However, it appear the the HEC model is providing 1 cfs as the Routing Summary. Please check and/or explain difference. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4928 or Bianca.Ramirez@tucsonaz.gov Bianca C. Ramirez Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4928 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/21/2008 | DELMA ROBEY | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 08/21/2008 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 08/21/2008 | GERARDO BONILLA | REJECT SHELF | Completed |