Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T08CM01161
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/15/2008 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Placement of "No Parking -Fire Lane" shall conform to 2006 IFC and C.O.T amendents. Subject to approval by Tucson Fire field inspector. |
| 04/21/2008 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 22 APRIL 2008 T08CM01161/DESERT CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS REVIEWED BY RON BROWN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW I. SHEET 1 OF 3: A . DENOTE GOVERNING ACCESSIBILITY CODE; 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 FOR PRIVATE PROPERTY II. SHEET 2 OF 3: A.DETAIL 5: 1.CHANGE REFERENCE ACCESSIBLE STANDARD TO 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 405 AND 406. 2. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS: 2' WIDE FOR DETECTABLE WARNING AND 4'-0" FOR ACCESSIBLE ROUTE BEHIND THE DETECTABLE WARNING. B. DETAIL 3: 1. CHANGE REFERENCE ACCESSIBLE STANDARD TO 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 405 AND 406. 2. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS: 4'-0" MIN AT TOP OF RAMP FOR ACCESSIBLE ROUTE C. DETAIL 8: REFERENCE SIGN GRAPHIC STANDARD DETAIL FROM "PARK WISE", MR. DON ANGEL, 429-3318. III. SHEET 3 OF 3: A. DENOTE RIGHT OF WAY ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS; COT DOT 207 FOR CURB RAMPS AT DRIVE ENTRANCES. PROVIDE CURB RAMPS AT DRIVE ENTRANCES ACCORDINGLY. B.PROVIDE AND IDENTIFY ACCESSIBLE ROUTE THROUGHOUT SITE TO ALL BUILDING ENTRANCES AND EXITS AND PARKING FACILITIES AND TO NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION POINT AS PER ICC 117.1, SECTION 402 1. SHOW LOCATION OF NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION DROP OFF POINT. 2. PROVIDE SPOT GRADES THROUGHOUT ACCESSIBLE ROUTE SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SLOPE REQUIREMENTS OF 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 SECTION 403.3. 3. WIDTH OF ACCESSIBLE ROUTES TO BE 4' MIN AS PER DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. C. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES: 1. RELOCATE THREE OF THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES IN THE PARKING ROW CLOSEST TO THE ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE OF THE OFFICE, 2006 IBC, SECTION 1106.6. 2. EXTEND THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM THE MIDDLE SCHOOL ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE TO THE NEAREST ADJACENT PARKING ROW. RELOCATE TWO OF THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE TO THIS ACCESSIBLE ROUTE EXTENSION, 2006 IBC, SECTION 1106.6. 3. IDENTIFY ONE VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE AS PER 2006 IBC, SECTION 1106; ICC 117.1, SECTION 503. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAILS SHOWING SIZE OF SPACE AND ISLE, SIGNAGE, ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AND GRADE SLOPES. 4. SURFACE SLOPES FOR ALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING AREAS TO BE NO GREATER THAN 1:48, ICC 117.1, SECTION 502.5. PROVIDE SPOT GRADES REFLECTING COMPLIANCE D. ALL PASSENGER LOADING ZONES TO BE COMPLIANT WITH 2006 IBC SECTION 1106.7 AND ICC 117.1 SECTION 503. END OF REVIEW |
| 04/22/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Add the development designator "5" to the general notes along with the "subject to" restriction. The proposed educational use in the SR zone is subject to LUC 3.5.3.7. 2. Add a general note which states that the project is designed to meet the criteria of LUC 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes Setback Zone. 3. Add the location, type, size and height of any proposed signage. DS 2-02.2.1.A.13 4. A continuous pedestrian circulation path is required to connect all public access areas of the development to each other and to the public right-of-way. Revise plan to demonstrate compliance. DS 2-08.3.1 5. The project is subject to the provisions of the Environmental Resource Overlay Zone (ERZ), LUC 2.8.6. An overlay zone application is required for this project. In order to review the site plan, all existing and proposed structures and vehicle use area must be shown on the plan, along with required calculations, building setbacks, heights, dimensions, etc. Applications for projects within the ERZ shall be reviewed in accordance with the DSD Full Notice Procedure, Sec. 23A-50 and 23A-51. Contact Patricia Gehlen, Zoning Manager for application information. The decision to approve or deny the project will be based on the purpose, intent, and specific regulations of LUC 2.8.6. Upon approval of the overlay zone application, add the ERZ case number, date of approval and conditions imposed as a general note on the site plan, and add the case number in the lower right hand corner of each sheet of the site, grading, landscape and NPPO plans. LUC 2.8.6.2.C DS 2-02 6. Class 2 bicycle parking facilities shall be evenly distributed and located no more than 50 feet from main building entrances and will be along the front side of buildings as well as along the sides of buildings that have entrances. Revise plan accordingly. DS 2-09.4.1 7. Based on aerial photos, there are a number of existing buildings on the site which must be removed in order to construct the school, its ball fields and other structures and amenites. Demo permits must be obtained. Provide copy of the stamped-approved demo plans. |
| 04/23/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The project is subject to the provisions of the Environmental Resource Overlay Zone (ERZ), LUC 2.8.6. An overlay zone application is required for this project. In order to review the site plan, all existing and proposed structures and vehicle use area must be shown on the plan, along with required calculations, building setbacks, heights, dimensions, etc. Applications for projects within the ERZ shall be reviewed in accordance with the DSD Full Notice Procedure, Sec. 23A-50 and 23A-51. Contact Patricia Gehlen, Zoning Manager for application information. The decision to approve or deny the project will be based on the purpose, intent, and specific regulations of LUC 2.8.6. Upon approval of the overlay zone application, add the ERZ case number, date of approval and conditions imposed as a general note on the site plan, and add the case number in the lower right hand corner of each sheet of the site, grading, landscape and NPPO plans. LUC 2.8.6.2.C DS 2-02 2. Submittal materials will include an Environmental Resource Report as established in Development Standard 9-06.0 and in conformance with Development Standard 2-15.3.5. This Report presents a study of the resource corridor and documents locations of the resource corridor and critical riparian habitat. If preservation of the critical riparian habitat cannot be accomplished as provided in these regulations, the submittal will include a mitigation plan as required in Sec. 2.8.6.5.D. Permits for grubbing, grading, construction, or any other improvements will not be issued until all applicable requirements of Sec. 2.8.6.5 and Sec. 2.8.6.6 are met. 3. Show the location of temporary holding nursery to be used for the TOS trees. DS 2-15.3.4.A.5 |
| 04/23/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The project is subject to the provisions of the Environmental Resource Overlay Zone (ERZ), LUC 2.8.6. An overlay zone application is required for this project. In order to review the site plan, all existing and proposed structures and vehicle use area must be shown on the plan, along with required calculations, building setbacks, heights, dimensions, etc. Applications for projects within the ERZ shall be reviewed in accordance with the DSD Full Notice Procedure, Sec. 23A-50 and 23A-51. Contact Patricia Gehlen, Zoning Manager for application information. The decision to approve or deny the project will be based on the purpose, intent, and specific regulations of LUC 2.8.6. Upon approval of the overlay zone application, add the ERZ case number, date of approval and conditions imposed as a general note on the site plan, and add the case number in the lower right hand corner of each sheet of the site, grading, landscape and NPPO plans. LUC 2.8.6.2.C DS 2-02 2. Submittal material will include an Environmental Resource Report (ERR) as established in Development Standard 9-06.0 and in conformance with Development Standard 2-15.3.5. This Report presents a study of the resource corridor and documents locations of the resource corridor and critical riparian habitat. If preservation of the critical riparian habitat cannot be accomplished as provided in these regulations, the submittal will include a mitigation plan as required in Sec. 2.8.6.5.D. Permits for grubbing, grading, construction, or any other improvements will not be issued until all applicable requirements of Sec. 2.8.6.5 and Sec. 2.8.6.6 are met. 3. One (1) canopy tree must be provided for every thirty-three (33) linear feet of landscape border or fraction therof per LUC 3.7.2.4. If the length of the street landscape border is 600 feet as stated on sheet L-1, a total of 19 canopy trees is required. 4. Within a vehicular use area, one (1) canopy tree is required for each ten (10) motor vehicle parking spaces or fraction thereof per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1. With 112 parking spaces proposed a total of 12 parking lot canopy trees are required. Revise calculation to show the correct number of trees required. 5. Landscape plan shall include irrigation specification design and layout per DS 2-06.5.4.A & DS 2-06.5.4.B including source of irrigation, sleeves for driveways and sidewalks, locations of valves, low-flow bubblers or drip irrigation. Provide an irrigation plan as required. 6. Some of the trees proposed, such as evergreen elm and arizona sycamore, are not found on the ADWR drought tolerant plant list. Revise the landscape plan to remove plants which are not listed on the approved list or provide a complete calculation of the square footage of the oasis area provided. DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.b 7. Detail required screening on the landscape plan. Label the location, height, and materials on the plan drawing. DS 2-07.2.2.A.3 |
| 06/02/2008 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | June 9, 2008 T08CM01161 Site Plan Review The site plan cannot be approved at this time. The following comments must be addressed and a revised plan submitted for review. 1. The project site is subject to the Environmental Resource Zone overlay review requirements. The Site Plan cannot be approved until the ERZ review has been completed and approved. 2. Revise general note 17 to indicate areas of the property is also affected by FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area Zone AE. 3. Provide recordation information for the right-of-way that is to be dedicated to the city (key note 3.) 4. Keynote 42 is called out on the plan view. Provide a corresponding note. 5. Provide dimensions for the sidewalks at representative locations throughout the site. If you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting, contact me at loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, EIT Senior Engineering Associate |