Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T08CM01058
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/16/2008 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | See previous comments no new plans were submitted. |
| 06/17/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the Native Plant Preservation worksheet on sheet NPPO-1 to show the correct number under the mitigation columns. Refer to the native plant preservation worksheet in DS 2-13 for correct calculation method. 2. Many of the plants listed in the native plant preservation inventory list are non-native. Revise or clarify. 3. The "Project Overview" states that there are sweet acacias on the site which are to be salvaged and transplanted but they are not listed in the preservation and inventory tables. The native mesquite trees are not listed in the inventory. Revise to be complete and accurate. 4. Provide a more legible aerial photograph as part of the native plant preservation plan. The one provided does not clearly show features on the ground. 5. The Native Plant Fencing Standards is incorrectly written. Remove reference to "Parks Department". 6. Surveyed plant #31 does not appear on the aerial photo plan. Revise NPP plan to include plant location. |
| 06/17/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. In addition to providing the square footage of all landscaped areas add a calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage per DS 2-07.2.2.2.g. Fifty (50) percent or more of the street landscape border area must have shrubs and vegetative ground cover per LUC 3.7.2.4 2. A continuous screen along the Major Street & Route must be provided per LUC Table 3.7.2-I The screen wall shown on the landscape plan does not appear to be continuous because of breaks in the wall and no screening is indicated to the north of the northermost entrance drive. Revise as necesary. 3. Within vehicular use areas, one (1) canopy tree is required for each 10 motor vehicle parking spaces and every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.a. Some of the proposed parking spaces near the southern boundary of the project do no fall within 40 feet of a canopy tree. Revise plan as required. 4. Revise any lettering and dimensions in the set of Playground Construction Documents (all sheets) which does not meet the minimum text size requirement of 12 point (0.12"). 5. Add a calculation stating the length and width of street landscape border and number of canopy trees per length. DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.f |
| 06/17/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/17/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Clarify General Note 22 on sheet C-1. The Development Standard Section listed in this note does not exist. If a Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR) has been applied for add the case number, date of approval, and any conditions imposed to the site plan. |
| 06/19/2008 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/07/2008 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: July 7, 2008 SUBJECT: Tutor Time Daycare- 2nd Site Plan Review TO: Maolin Zheng LOCATION: 51 S Pantano Road, T14S R15E Sec16, Ward 2 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T08CM01058 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the submitted site plan, Drainage Report (BSW International, Inc., 10MAR08 revised 12JUN08) and Geotechnical Engineering Report (Acura Engineering, 15NOV07 addendum 20MAR08 and 11JUN08). The site plan is not approved at this time. Please address the following comments: SITE PLAN COMMENTS: 1) Sheet C3 was reviewed for site plan purposes only. Revise the title block on Sheet C3 to read either "Preliminary Grading Plan" or add the words "Not for Construction" in the title block to assure that the site plan is not used as the construction document. 2) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan to clearly show that public access is not allowed through the proposed fire lane access point. Per conversation with City of Tucson Fire Department it has been asked that a rapid entry box be installed at the south end of the 20-foot access road at the intersection of the road and the proposed fire truck cul-de-sac. Vehicles can not use the fire access lane as a driveway or access point into the adjacent neighborhood, revise. See attached City of Tucson Letter from Randy Esslinger for further information on the style and type of rapid entry boxes that are acceptable to the City of Tucson Fire Department. 3) DS Sec.2-01.2.1.A.12: Provide the required DSMR for modifying the development standards to allow the existing 4-foot sidewalk along Pantano Road to remain and not constructing the required 6-foot sidewalk along the MS&R route. The DSMR must be approved prior to site plan approval. All exhibits and discussion must reflect any changes made by the approved DSMR. Provide a General Note (#22) to list the DSMR number, the Development Standard being modified, conditions of DSMR approval along with the date of DSMR approval. 4) DS Sec.2-01.2.1.A.16: Revise the site plan to label and dimension the proposed berm in the northeast corner of the lot. Revise the dimension of the berm to show a minimum 3-foot wide top for compaction and maintenance purposes. 5) DS Sec.2-01.2.1.A.16: Revise the site plan to provide clean outs at all junctions for the 10-inch PVC pipe that is used for the roof run off. All junctions must provide a clean out for maintenance purposes, revise. 6) DS Sec.2-01.2.1.A.23: Revise the site plan to only include the Bench Mark note that is referencing the City Field Book and page number for the datum referenced used. Provide only one bench mark reference on the site plan GRADING PLAN: 7) Please ensure the grading plan is consistent with the Site Plan and Drainage Report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf 8) Approval from TDOT Permits and Codes for all improvements within the public right-of-way will be required. A right-of-way use permit application will be required prior to construction. Contact Thad Harvison, (520)-837-6592 or Thad.Harvison@tucsonaz.gov for all right-of-way requirements and permit applications. 9) Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) requirements are applicable to this project due to the proposed disturbed area. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) and text addressing stormwater controls for all areas affected by construction activities related to this development will be reviewed with the grading plan submittal. For further information, visit, www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised site plan that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the site plan. Please enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package for reference. For any questions or to schedule a meeting, call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 07/10/2008 | JOSE ORTIZ | DOT TRAFFIC | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/10/2008 | SUE REEVES | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/10/2008 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |