Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T08CM01058
Parcel: 13413057W

Address:
51 S PANTANO RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW

Permit Number - T08CM01058
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/28/2008 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Denied Please include the following design criteria to the plans.
1. Flow data (static pressure, residual pressure, GPM)
Available from the Fire Department (520) 791-3234
2. The standard to be used in development of sprinkler system. (NFPA 13, NFPA 13R, or NFPA 13D)
3. The hazard classification of the building, including any special hazards.
4. The density required of the water supply.
05/29/2008 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 29 MAY 2008
T08CM01058/TUTOR TIME LEARNING CENTER/REVIEWED BY RON BROWN AND ERIC NEWCOMB
CODE REVIEW
2006 IBC/ICC 117.1
DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW
I. GENERAL
A. ALL SHEETS: LETTERING FONT TO BE MINIMUM 1/8" IN HEIGHT. USE OF 3/32" FONT MUST BE APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL THROUGH THE APPEAL PROCESS. APPROVAL MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH THE DOCUMENTS.
II. SHEET A0-1:
A. ACCESSIBILITY NOTE 2: ADD MAX 5% LATERAL SLOPES. IF MORE THAN 5% WALKWAY BECOMES A RAMP AS PER ANSI 405.
B. APPLICABLE CODES: CHANGE HANDICAP CODE FROM "ADA" TO 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1
III. SHEET A1-0:
A. FOR THE EXTERIOR DRINKING FOUNTAIN, PROVIDE DUAL HEIGHT WATER SPOUTS.
IV. SHEET A1-1:
A. DETAIL 4: You might want to add a note; "IF REQUIRED IN JURISDICTION". This is not a seismic requirement for the Tucson area.
V. SHEET A4-1:
A. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAILS OF ALL DIFFERENT TYPES OF TOILETS REQUIRED AND SHOWN ON PLAN SHOWING ALL SPACE AND ACCESSIBLE DIMENSIONS. PLEASE DO NOT PROVIDE DIMENSIONAL REFERENCE SCHEDULES.
VI. SHEET A5-4:
A. DETAIL 15: SINK TO BE ACCESSIBLE AT A FINISHED FLOOR HEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED 2'-10", ANSI 606.3
VII. SHEET A6-0:
A. DOOR NUMBER 57 AND 58 NEED TO BE FIRE RATED.
VIII. SHEET A6-0:
A. DETAIL 1: INDICATE 7'-0" A.F.G. TO BOTTOM OF MAIN SIGN AND ADD "VAN ACCESSIBLE" SIGN.
B. DETAILS 2, 3 AND 7, DETECTABLE WARNINGS AT THESE LOCATIONS ARE OPTIONAL IF NOT PART OF A MARKED CROSSING SYSTEM. IF PROVIDED, THEY NEED BE ONLY 2'-0" WIDE, ICC 117.1 406.12, 406.13, 406.14 AND 705.5.
C. DETAIL 7:
1. PROVIDE A MINIMUM 4' WIDE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AT TOP OF RAMP
2. PROVIDE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE DIMENSIONS INCLUDING PREFERRED DIMENSIONS FOR "VAN ACCESSIBLE" SPACES AS PER ICC 117.1, SECTION 502.
3. PROVIDE REQUIRED SLOPE OF 2% IN BOTH DIRECTIONS
4. RELOCATE ACCESSIBLE SIGNAGE TO CURB LINE
5. IDENTIFY "VAN ACCESSIBLE" SPACE.
IX. STRUCTURAL REVIEW
A. SPECIAL INSPECTION FORMS ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED FOR THOSE ITEMS LISTED ON SHEET S-1.
B. SHEET S-5; DETAIL 4: CHANGE NOTE '(12) #5 EACH CELL TYP.' TO (2) #5 EACH CELL TYPICAL. VERIFY.
C. SHEET S-2; FOUNDATION PLAN: ON NORTH WALL, WEST OF GRID LINE 2.4, A FOOTING IS INDICATED ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE WALL. CLARIFY.
D. SHEET S-3; FRONT ROTUNDA PLAN: NOTE AT SECTION CUT 17/S-7 SHOULD BE 'TYP. @ CORNICE TRUSS' RATHER THAN 'CORNER TRUSS'. VERIFY.
E. SHEET A3-1, SECTION 17; SHEET S-7, DETAIL 3: COORDINATE ARCHITECTURAL WITH STRUCTURAL SECTIONS. PROVIDE CONNECTION OF METAL STUDS (ABOVE) TO ROOF JOISTS ON DETAIL 3.
F. SHEET S-3; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: SECTION 2/S-7 CUT IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS AT THE NORTH AND SOUTH EXTERIOR WALLS IS INCORRECT. MODIFY.
END OF REVIEW
05/29/2008 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Building plan can not be approved prior to site plan approval. Refer to comments posted under the site plan dated May 22, 2008. JG
05/29/2008 JOHN WILLIAMS COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Completed Impact Fee's Do Apply; East District; 18,556 Square Feet Child Care Facility; $89,953.82
06/17/2008 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
06/18/2008 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 1/8-inch (all upper case). (A 3/32" font may be allowed with an appeal to the building official.) Reference: Section 106.1.1, IBC 2006.
2. Show that the roof top heat pumps are being installed in accordance with the conditions of its listing and the manufacturer's installation requirements with respect to the design of the condensate drain traps (detail 12/P-3). Reference: Section 304.1, IMC 2006.
3. Provide information to show how the condensate drain system has been sized. Reference: Section 307.2.2, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
4. Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation. Reference: Section 401.2, IMC 2006.
5. Provide information on the sequence of operation for the restroom exhaust to show that recirculation of the air from the restroom will not occur. Reference: Section 403.2.1, IMC 2006.
6. Provide structural calculations and details to show that the Type II hood is supported from the building structure in accordance with Section 507.6, IMC 2006. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006.
7. Show how adequate make up air is being provided for the Type II kitchen exhaust hood. Reference: Sections 403.3 and 508.1 IMC 2006.
8. Clarify the size for the kitchen exhaust duct. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.
06/18/2008 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 1/8-inch (all upper case). (A 3/32" font may be allowed with an appeal to the building official.) Reference: Section 106.1.1, IBC 2006.
2. Clarify the size of the building sewer downstream of the gravity grease interceptor; the civil drawings show a 6" building sewer. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
3. Indicate the required slope of the building drain and of the building sewer. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
4. The design of the water heater piping (detail 16/P-3), with valves located between the water heaters and the expansion tank, makes it impossible for the expansion tank to accommodate the thermal expansion of the water in the water heaters, as intended by Section 608.3, UPC 2006.
5. Provide the water pressure and water pipe sizing calculations. Reference: Section 610.1, UPC 2006.
6. Provide upper terminal cleanouts on horizontal drainage pipes exceeding 5 feet in length (horizontal drain lines serving sinks require cleanouts regardless of length). Reference: Section 707.4, UPC 2006
7. Show how the two-way cleanout fitting called out in detail 2/P3 conforms to the requirements of 707.6, UPC 2006.
8. Provide a direct waste connection for the wash and rinse sections of the 3-compartment sink, with an indirect connection for the sanitizing compartment. Reference: Sections 304.0 and 801.2.3, UPC 2006.
9. Provide indirect waste piping for the prep sink (DS). Reference: Section 801.2, UPC 2006
06/20/2008 LINDA BUCZYNSKI ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL.

PLEASE CALL AT 520.837.4907 OR EMAIL AT Linda.Buczynski@tucsonaz.gov
IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS.

1. Pole and foundation detail and calculations shall be designed and sealed by a Registered Structural Engineer. Coordinate with Structural Plans Examiner for deferred submittal.
2. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 1/8-inch (all upper case). Reference Section 106.1.1, IBC 2006.
3. Sheet E1. Indicate panel and circuit for Monument Sign.
4. Add Fixture U to Tucson Lighting Code calculations.
5. Option 2 on Table 5.1 of the Tucson Lighting Code may only be used if all of the fixtures on site are full cutoff. Since Fixture U is an uplight, this Option may not be used.
6. Fixture SA is 250W per Lighting Fixture Schedule Sheet E2, and 400W per Luminaire Schedule Sheet (unnumbered). Clarify for this instance and all others which may apply.
7. Fixture SA quantity 4 on Sheet E1, 3 on Luminaire Schedule Sheet (unnumbered). Clarify for this instance and all others which may apply.
8. Panel B-42 appears to have 3.6 KW of connected load, with 4-SA and 6-SF, but 1.2 KW is counted on panel schedule. Please clarify.
9. Fixture SF, a 208V fixture, is on a 120V circuit. Please clarify.
10. B-39 is a spare on the panel schedule, but has exterior lighting.
11. Provide cut sheets for all exterior lighting.
12. Ckt B-16 has interior lighting per Sheet E2. No electrical load on panel schedule.
13. Provide conductor size for oven conductors on C-29,31, E-20,22,24 and for all other circuits rated greater than 20A.
14. After consideration of 25% for continuous loads, the feeder to Panel B appears to be overloaded at aprox. 177A.
15. Not a City of Tucson Code issue, but TEP may not allow service entrance conductors exceeding 500MCM for this type of electrical service, http://www.tucsonelectric.com/Business/.
16. It appears that series ratings on Panels D and E violate NEC 240.86 (C).
06/23/2008 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: 51 S PANTANO RD
T08CM01058
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 23, 2008

1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956

C:\planning\grading\t08cm01058.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents
07/07/2008 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied NEED TO SHOW LOCATION/METHOD OF CONNECTION TO PUBLIC SEWER

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
07/10/2008 SUE REEVES OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
07/10/2008 GERARDO BONILLA REJECT SHELF Completed