Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T08CM00429
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/03/2008 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/08/2008 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Development Services Department, Plans Coordination Office FROM: Heather Thrall, Senior Planner PROJECT: T08CM00429, 1477 W. Commerce Court Phase 3, new office building and small site improvements Commercial Site Plan, 1st Review TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 9, 2008 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments for Land Use Code and Development Standards were met - OR EMAIL ME FOR A COUNTER APPT. 1. This project was reviewed for compliance with the Land Use Code (LUC) and Development Standards (DS). Specifically, compliance with the criteria in DS 2-02. 2. Per DS 2-02.2.1.7, call out distance between buildings 3 & 4 - at closest edge of roofs. 3. Per DS 2-02.2.1.12, please call out the location of the sidewalk leading to the west entry of building 4, it's too hard to see under the canopy lines. Ensure minimum walkway is dimensioned at 4' wide please. 4. Per DS 2-02.2.1.12, ensure pedestrian gates are a minimum of 4' wide, per DS 2-08. 5. Per DS 2-02.2.1.13, please call out any proposed free-standing signage and lighting with vertical clearance and applicable specifications. 6. Per DS 2-02.2.1.20, please ensure all easements are graphically shown - if applicable - with their recordation information noted next to them. 7. Per DS 2-02.2.2.A.3, under the Floor Area Ratio notes on sheet X1.0 - please revise the total building square footage to read 40639 (building 4 reduced in size from the phase 3 plan) - I acknowledge the same FAR calc end result is .19 and works fine, thank you. 8. I further acknowledge the site has had 3 prior phases approved within the last year, which would mean that the site should be meeting current code compliance now, and when the work is finished on this last phase. 9. I'm willing to do a check of your responses in a meeting at the counter. Email me for an appointment time at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov HCT C:\planning\site\DSD\T08CM00429 1477 w commerce ct phase 3.doc |
| 04/09/2008 | RBROWN1 | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/09/2008 | SREEVES1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 04/15/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/16/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | NPPO | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/21/2008 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: May 21, 2008 SUBJECT: COPE Behavioral Services Site/Grading Plan- Engineering Review TO: Reliable Permits Attn: Joe Barbea LOCATION: 1477 W Commerce CT, T15S R13E Sec15, Ward 1 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T08CM00429 (Site Plan) and Grading Plan (T08BU00246) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the submitted site plan and grading plan. The site plan and grading plan is not approved at this time. Please address the following comments: SITE PLAN COMMENTS: 1) DS Sec2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to label and dimension the width of the proposed gates. Per DS Sec.2-08 a minimum 4-foot gate is required. 2) DS Sec2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to clearly label and dimension the required pedestrian circulation from existing Building 3 to proposed Building 4. 3) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Revise the site plan and Keynote #14 to provide a modified Type 1 scupper that is proposed for the 2-cells at concentration points 10.7 and 10.7A. Per Standard Public Improvement Detail 204 a Type 1 scupper does not dimension a 2-cell width, revise. GRADING PLAN: 4) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.3: Revise the grading plan, Sheet C2, to include keynote #14 on the south side of the proposed building. This landscape area must be depressed a minimum of 6-inch to maximize water harvesting and to ensure the drainage of the swale and roof runoff. 5) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.4: Revise the grading plan, Sheet C2, to verify the scupper location for the existing concentration point 10.3. 6) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.4: Revise the grading plan and Sheet C2, to clarify the runoff location for concentration point 10.3B. Verify if there is a wall opening or if the portion of this area is wrought iron, flow through. 7) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.4: Revise the site plan and Keynote #14 to provided a modified Type 1 scupper that is proposed for the 2-cells at concentration points 10.7 and 10.7A. Per Standard Public Improvement Detail 204 a Type 1 scupper does not dimension a 2-cell width, revise. 8) Please ensure the grading plan is consistent with the site plan and drainage report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised site plan and grading plan that address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the site plan and grading plan. Please enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package for reference. For any questions or to schedule a meeting, call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/23/2008 | BETH GRANT | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 05/23/2008 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |