Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T08BU00996
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/04/2008 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 06/04/2008 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan at this time. 2. While zoning acknowledges that the grading plan is in substantial zoning compliance as it relates to the Zoning review purview, with the unapproved version of the development plan, the grading plan cannot be approved at this time. Please review the grading plan and compare it to the most current version of the development plan to ensure accuracy and to ensure that any revisions that have been made to the development plan after the grading plan was submitted are addressed. 3. Please ensure that the grading plan matches the CDRC approved and stamped development plan. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the CDRC approved and stamped development plan. 4. It is my understanding from staff that revisions are proposed and that the development plan may be revised. If this is the case, the grading plan must be revised to match any changes made to the development plan. Additionla comments may be forthcoming based on changes made to the development plan and grading plan. |
| 06/18/2008 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit a copy of the approved development plan including landscape and native plant preservation plans for reference. The grading application will be reviewed for compliance when the approved documents are included in the submittal. Revise grading plans as necessary to comply with the approved documents. |
| 07/21/2008 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | July 23, 2008 T08BU00996 Grading Review Address each of the following comments. Include a letter explaining how each comment is addressed. Note that additional comments may be forthcoming. 1. Revise the grading notes on the grading plan to indicate that the grading will be consistent with the applicable development standard. 2. Revise the notes to indicate that the contractor will comply with state stormwater discharge regulations. 3. The grading plan shows "Future ADA Connection to R.O.W." Revise the plan to show features that are to be constructed now. 4. Include all symbols in the legend. 5. Revise the plan to ensure that data do not overlap to obscure underlying information. 6. In order to have the grading and drainage construction information presented in a form that is effective for review and construction, please consider providing separate sheets for utility specifications. 7. At every location where retaining walls are proposed, provide sufficient spot elevations to clearly indicate the side of the wall with retained earth. Provide additional proposed spot grades throughout the site to establish the drainage and proposed terrain characteristics. 8. Check all of the references to details to ensure that they are correctly directed. For example the reference for the solid waste container/enclosure detail in the legend on sheet 1 is incorrect. Check and revise all references as necessary. 9. Provide a revised geotechnical evaluation that clearly describes this project location. The site descriptions on page 2 of the submitted report do not appear to match this project. 10. Revise the grading plan details to incorporate the recommendations of the geotechnical evaluation. 11. Use the checklist that ADEQ has provided to meet the requirements of the permit issued in February of this year. 12. Clearly show the location of the Hunter Construction Yard site referenced in the SWPPP on the site map. 13. The SWPPP indicates that concrete trucks won't be allowed to wash out on site unless a concrete washout facility is provided. Provide specifications for the washout facility that must be met if one is provided. 14. The SWPPP book and site map must be sealed by a civil engineer or landscape architect and the known operators must sign the required certification statements before the SWPPP is approved. 15. Indicate in the SWPPP whether there are any drywells that might receive discharge from this site. If you have questions or wish to set up a meeting please contact me at loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov Loren Makus Senior Engineering Associate |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/28/2008 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/28/2008 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |