Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T08BU00699
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/14/2008 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit a copy of the approved site plan including landscape native plant preservation plans and appropriate overlay zone documentation for reference. The grading application will be reviewed for compliance when the approved documents are included in the submittal. Revise grading plans as necessary to comply with the approved plans. |
| 05/21/2008 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 05/21/2008 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan at this time. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the CDRC approved and stamped development plan. Please submit two copies of the CDRC approved and stamped development plan, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the CDRC approved and stamped development plan and landscape/NPPO plans. Additional comments may be forthcoming. 3. It does not appear that a development plan for this address has been submitted for review. No activity for this address shows up in Permits Plus. It is suggested that a call to Patricia Gehlen be made to resolve any issues with development plan requirements and the stoppage of the previous development plan D06-0031. |
| 06/19/2008 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | June 19, 2008 T08BU00699/T08OT00847 Desert Christian School Grading and Floodplain Use Permit Review First Review Loren Makus, EIT 1. The grading plan cannot be approved until the Environmental Resource Zone submittal and site plan have been approved. Additional comments may be forthcoming on future reviews depending on any changes resulting from the reviews of the ERZ and site plans. 2. Revise the SWPPP and drainage report to correctly identify the current or most recent status of the project site. The two reports indicate the site is undeveloped. However, aerial photography indicates that the site has been previously developed. Show the features of the previous development as existing conditions on the grading plan. 3. Revise the SWPPP to indicate the percentage of the site that is impervious before and after construction. (Part III.C.2.d) 4. Discuss in the SWPPP and in the drainage report how the discharge from the west channel will be rendered non-erosive between the end of the constructed channel and the main channel of the Tanque Verde Wash. 5. Describe the planned phasing or sequencing of land disturbance activities. The amount of open/disturbed dirt left open at one time should be minimized where possible. (Part III.C.2.b) 6. Indicate the percentage of the site that is impervious before and after construction. (Part III.C.2.d) 7. Clearly indicate on the site map the areas that will not be disturbed by construction activities. (Part III.C.3.b) 8. Identify the Tanque Verde Wash on the site map. (Part III.C.3.f) 9. Clearly identify the locations where stormwater discharges to the Tanque Verde Wash. (Part III.C.3.g) |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/23/2008 | VFLORES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |