Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T08BU00336
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/11/2008 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit a copy of the approved landscape plans for reference. The grading application will be reviewed for compliance when the approved documents are included in the submittal. |
| 03/21/2008 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 03/21/2008 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan at this time. 2. While zoning acknowledges that the grading plan is in substantial zoning compliance as it relates to the Zoning review purview, with the approved version of the development plan, the grading plan cannot be approved at this time. It does not appear that there is sufficient information to call the development plan a grading plan 3. Please ensure that the grading plan matches the CDC approved and stamped development plan. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the CDRC approved and stamped development plan. Please ensure that the grading plan matches the CDC approved and stamped development plan. Additional comments could be forthcoming. 4. The required development plan with landscape and NPPO plans that must be included with the grading plan package and must be the CDRC approved and stamped set. Two copies of each are required. 5. Label the maximum slope allowed for handicapped parking spaces and access aisle that serves the parking spaces. The maximum slope allowed per ANSI section 503.4 is 1:48 (2%). Label the slope on the handicapped parking space detail and access aisle. Detail H is labeled with the incorrect slope. 6. Draw and label the required truncated domes on the grading plan or refer to detail drawings on the grading plan that provides the required information. |
| 04/21/2008 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | April 29, 2008 T08BU00336 Grading Plan Review Reviewed by Loren Makus 1. Provide grading plans on sheets titled "Grading Plan" 2. Clearly indicate grading limits. Show limits of proposed right-of-way improvements as well. Provide an estimate of the total area to be graded. 3. Provide references to appropriate details on the plan sheets. For example item C in the legend on Sheet 200 indicates accessible ramp w/truncated domes. Provide a reference to the detail. 4. Provide a note indicating that all landscape areas will be depressed to maximize water harvesting. 5. Provide the project site address on the grading plan cover sheet. 6. Provide general dimensions for the retention areas. Also provide proposed spot elevations for the basin floors. Indicate by spot elevations or by note that the basins will be graded to drain to one area of the basin. 7. Provide estimated cut and fill quantities. 8. Revise the SWPPP to include operator certifications and copies of the Construction General Permit. 9. Note that the previous CGP has expired and a new general permit has been issued by the State of Arizona Department of Environmental Quality. The SWPPP must be compared and revised to be consistent with the new general permit. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/30/2008 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 04/30/2008 | SHANAE POWELL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |